|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Signaling protein
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Structure of g-alpha-i1 bound to a gdp-selective peptide provides insight into guanine nucleotide exchange
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Guanine nucleotide-binding protein g(i), alpha-1 subunit. Chain: a, b, c, d. Fragment: sequence database residues 25-353. Synonym: adenylate cyclase-inhibiting g alpha protein, g- alpha-i1. Engineered: yes. Kb752 peptide. Chain: e, f, g, h.
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: gnai1. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Other_details: protein selected by phage display
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Dimer (from
)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.50Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.240
|
R-free:
|
0.280
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
C.A.Johnston,F.S.Willard,M.R.Jezyk,Z.Fredericks,E.T.Bodor, M.B.Jones,R.Blaesius,T.K.Harden,J.Sondek,V.J.Watts, J.K.Ramer,D.P.Siderovski
|
Key ref:
|
 |
C.A.Johnston
et al.
(2005).
Structure of Galpha(i1) bound to a GDP-selective peptide provides insight into guanine nucleotide exchange.
Structure,
13,
1069-1080.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
24-Nov-04
|
Release date:
|
12-Jul-05
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Cellular component
|
intracellular
|
11 terms
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
cell cycle
|
9 terms
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
nucleotide binding
|
11 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
13:1069-1080
(2005)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure of Galpha(i1) bound to a GDP-selective peptide provides insight into guanine nucleotide exchange.
|
|
C.A.Johnston,
F.S.Willard,
M.R.Jezyk,
Z.Fredericks,
E.T.Bodor,
M.B.Jones,
R.Blaesius,
V.J.Watts,
T.K.Harden,
J.Sondek,
J.K.Ramer,
D.P.Siderovski.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Heterotrimeric G proteins are molecular switches that regulate numerous
signaling pathways involved in cellular physiology. This characteristic is
achieved by the adoption of two principal states: an inactive, GDP bound state
and an active, GTP bound state. Under basal conditions, G proteins exist in the
inactive, GDP bound state; thus, nucleotide exchange is crucial to the onset of
signaling. Despite our understanding of G protein signaling pathways, the
mechanism of nucleotide exchange remains elusive. We employed phage display
technology to identify nucleotide state-dependent Galpha binding peptides.
Herein, we report a GDP-selective Galpha binding peptide, KB-752, that enhances
spontaneous nucleotide exchange of Galpha(i) subunits. Structural determination
of the Galpha(i1)/peptide complex reveals unique changes in the Galpha switch
regions predicted to enhance nucleotide exchange by creating a GDP dissociation
route. Our results cast light onto a potential mechanism by which Galpha
subunits adopt a conformation suitable for nucleotide exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Biochemical Confirmation of the Overall
Structural Features of the Ga[i1]/KB-752 Interaction (A)
Ribbon trace of KB-752 (red) bound between the a2 ("switch II")
and a3 helices of the Ga[i1] Ras-like domain (blue). No contacts
are made between KB-752 and the all-helical domain (yellow) or
bound GDP (magenta). Switch regions are denoted in green.
(B) Structural basis for nucleotide selective binding of KB-752
to Ga[i1]. KB-752 peptide (red, translucent) binds Ga[i1]
between switch II and the a3 helix; the conformations of these
two helices are shown for Ga[i1] operator
GDP/KB-752 (green), Ga[i1] operator
GTPgS (yellow), and Ga[i1] operator
GDP operator
AlF[4]^ - (magenta). Whereas the a3 helix is not significantly
altered, switch II is displaced to accommodate KB-752 binding.
Switch II in both Ga[i1] operator
GTPgS and Ga[i1] operator
GDP operator
AlF[4]^ - assumes an extended a-helical conformation that is
stabilized relative to Ga[i1] operator
GDP (Mixon et al., 1995; Sprang, 1997). This conformation of
switch II is not permissive to KB-752 binding, as it creates
extensive steric hindrance. In particular, W211 of switch II
(shown in space filling) is in a restrictive position relative
to W5 of KB-752. (C) The GoLoco motif of RGS14 (orange) is
also seen to bind, in an a-helical conformation, between switch
II and the a3 helix of Ga[i1] (PDB ID 1KJY); the critical
arginine finger which contacts GDP is highlighted within the Ca
carbon ribbon trace of the GoLoco peptide. Other features are
colored as in (A). (D) KB-752 GEF activity does not rely on
the all-helical domain. 100 nM Ga[i1] or a chimeric Ga
containing the Ras-like domain of Ga[i1] and the all-helical
domain of Ga[o] ("Gaioi" [Remmers et al., 1999]) was incubated
in the absence or presence of 50 µM KB-752, and [35S]GTPgS
binding after 10 min at 30°C was measured as described in the
Experimental Procedures. Data are expressed as a percentage of
GTPgS bound relative to Ga protein in the absence of KB-752
("Control") and are the average ± SEM of four independent
experiments. Data shown are the mean ± SEM for five independent
experiments conducted in triplicate. (E) The KB-752 binding
site on Ga[i1] overlaps that of GoLoco motif peptides. Ga[i1]
(50 nM) was incubated in the absence or presence of the
indicated concentrations of a peptide representing the GoLoco
motif of RGS12 (R12GL) (Kimple et al., 2002). GTPgS binding was
then measured in the presence of the indicated concentrations of
KB-752. Data are expressed as fmol of GTPgS bound above that
measured in the absence of KB-752 and are from a representative
experiment of three independent experiments. (F) The
binding of KB-752 has no effect on the kinetics of Ga[i1]
activation by AlF[4]^ -, unlike the slowed activation rate seen
upon GoLoco peptide binding. Ga[i1]-CFP (200 nM) and YFP-RGS4
(280 nM) fusion proteins, previously shown to generate increased
fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) upon Ga[i1]
activation by AlF[4]^ - and subsequent RGS-box binding (Willard
et al., 2004), were mixed together and preincubated with either
10 µM KB-752 peptide or 5 µM GoLoco consensus peptide (AGS3Con
[Kimple et al., 2002]), prior to the addition of NaF and AlCl[3]
to final concentrations of 20 mM and 30 µM, respectively, at the
150 s mark.
|
 |
Figure 8.
Figure 8. Comparison of Switch Regions and Core Catalytic
Residues of KB-752 Bound Ga[i1] with Other States of Ga[i1]
(A) Movement of switch I in the Ga[i1] operator
GDP/KB-752 complex (green), versus its position in the
Ga[i1]b[1]g[2] heterotrimer (blue) and the Ga[i1] operator
GDP/R14GL complex (orange), results in disruption of a salt
bridge (black dotted line) between R178 and E43 that normally
stabilizes bound GDP (magenta) within Ga[i1] when complexed to a
GDI (Gbg or GoLoco peptide). (B) Electron density of the
R178 side chain in the Ga[i1] operator
GDP/KB-752 complex (from a 2F[o] - F[c] simulated annealing
composite omit map contoured to a level of 1s) is denoted by
white mesh. In the background is the b phosphate of the bound
GDP (bP). (C and D) Switch region comparisons with
activated Ga[i1] states. Switch regions of Ga[i1] operator
GDP/KB-752 (green), Ga[i1] operator
GDP operator
AlF[4]^ - (PDB code 1GFI; magenta; [C]), and Ga[i1] operator
GTPgS (PDB code 1GIA; yellow; [D]) are shown along with the
residues critical for GTP hydrolysis (R178 and T181 within
switch I and Q204 within switch II). GDP from the Ga[i1] operator
GDP/KB-752 structure is shown for reference in each case.
Overall conformation of the switch regions of Ga[i1] operator
GDP operator
AlF[4]^ - and Ga[i1] operator
GTPgS are very similar, save for key changes in the position of
catalytic residue side chains (Wall et al., 1998). Whereas
switch I of Ga[i1] operator
GDP/KB-752 is very similar to that of the activated forms, both
switch II and III are dramatically removed from the guanine
nucleotide to allow for GDP release. The catalytic Q204 residue
within switch II is far removed from the bound nucleotide and
active site for GTP hydrolysis in the Ga[i1] operator
GDP/KB-752 structure. However, R178 and T181 of switch I are in
a strikingly similar position to that of the Ga[i1] operator
GDP operator
AlF[4]^ - structure.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Cell Press:
Structure
(2005,
13,
1069-1080)
copyright 2005.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.F.Neuwald
(2009).
The charge-dipole pocket: a defining feature of signaling pathway GTPase on/off switches.
|
| |
J Mol Biol, 390,
142-153.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.M.Preininger,
M.A.Funk,
W.M.Oldham,
S.M.Meier,
C.A.Johnston,
S.Adhikary,
A.J.Kimple,
D.P.Siderovski,
H.E.Hamm,
and
T.M.Iverson
(2009).
Helix dipole movement and conformational variability contribute to allosteric GDP release in Galphai subunits.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 48,
2630-2642.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.E.Hamm,
S.M.Meier,
G.Liao,
and
A.M.Preininger
(2009).
Trp fluorescence reveals an activation-dependent cation-pi interaction in the Switch II region of Galphai proteins.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 18,
2326-2335.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Suzuki,
K.Tsumoto,
N.Hajicek,
K.Daigo,
R.Tokita,
S.Minami,
T.Kodama,
T.Hamakubo,
and
T.Kozasa
(2009).
Activation of Leukemia-associated RhoGEF by G{alpha}13 with Significant Conformational Rearrangements in the Interface.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 284,
5000-5009.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Johnston,
A.J.Kimple,
P.M.Giguère,
and
D.P.Siderovski
(2008).
Structure of the parathyroid hormone receptor C terminus bound to the G-protein dimer Gbeta1gamma2.
|
| |
Structure, 16,
1086-1094.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Johnston,
F.S.Willard,
J.K.Ramer,
R.Blaesius,
C.N.Roques,
and
D.P.Siderovski
(2008).
State-selective binding peptides for heterotrimeric G-protein subunits: novel tools for investigating G-protein signaling dynamics.
|
| |
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen, 11,
370-381.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.J.Austin,
W.W.Ja,
and
R.W.Roberts
(2008).
Evolution of class-specific peptides targeting a hot spot of the Galphas subunit.
|
| |
J Mol Biol, 377,
1406-1418.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.M.Oldham,
and
H.E.Hamm
(2008).
Heterotrimeric G protein activation by G-protein-coupled receptors.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 9,
60-71.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Luque,
I.Saugar,
J.F.Rodríguez,
N.Verdaguer,
D.Garriga,
C.S.Martín,
J.A.Velázquez-Muriel,
B.L.Trus,
J.L.Carrascosa,
and
J.R.Castón
(2007).
Infectious bursal disease virus capsid assembly and maturation by structural rearrangements of a transient molecular switch.
|
| |
J Virol, 81,
6869-6878.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.B.Blumer,
A.V.Smrcka,
and
S.M.Lanier
(2007).
Mechanistic pathways and biological roles for receptor-independent activators of G-protein signaling.
|
| |
Pharmacol Ther, 113,
488-506.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.J.Rojas,
M.E.Yohe,
S.Gershburg,
T.Kawano,
T.Kozasa,
and
J.Sondek
(2007).
Galphaq directly activates p63RhoGEF and Trio via a conserved extension of the Dbl homology-associated pleckstrin homology domain.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 282,
29201-29210.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Johnston,
E.S.Lobanova,
A.S.Shavkunov,
J.Low,
J.K.Ramer,
R.Blaesius,
Z.Fredericks,
F.S.Willard,
B.Kuhlman,
V.Y.Arshavsky,
and
D.P.Siderovski
(2006).
Minimal determinants for binding activated G alpha from the structure of a G alpha(i1)-peptide dimer.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 45,
11390-11400.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.L.Rich,
and
D.G.Myszka
(2006).
Survey of the year 2005 commercial optical biosensor literature.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit, 19,
478-534.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Johnston,
J.K.Ramer,
R.Blaesius,
Z.Fredericks,
V.J.Watts,
and
D.P.Siderovski
(2005).
A bifunctional Galphai/Galphas modulatory peptide that attenuates adenylyl cyclase activity.
|
| |
FEBS Lett, 579,
5746-5750.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|