 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription factor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1wtu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Transcription factor
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Transcription factor 1, nmr, minimized average structure
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Transcription factor 1. Chain: a, b. Synonym: tf1. Engineered: yes. Other_details: this protein is the bacillus subtilis phage spo1-encoded type ii DNA-binding protein
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Bacillus phage spo1. Organism_taxid: 10685. Gene: tf1. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
|
|
NMR struc:
|
 |
1 models
|
 |
|
Authors:
|
 |
X.Jia,A.Grove,M.Ivancic,V.L.Hsu,E.P.Geiduschek,D.R.Kearns
|
Key ref:
|
 |
X.Jia
et al.
(1996).
Structure of the Bacillus subtilis phage SPO1-encoded type II DNA-binding protein TF1 in solution.
J Mol Biol,
263,
259-268.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
29-Jul-96
|
Release date:
|
12-Feb-97
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P04445
(TF1_BPSP1) -
Transcription factor 1
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
99 a.a.
99 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
regulation of transcription
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
DNA binding
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
263:259-268
(1996)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure of the Bacillus subtilis phage SPO1-encoded type II DNA-binding protein TF1 in solution.
|
|
X.Jia,
A.Grove,
M.Ivancic,
V.L.Hsu,
E.P.Geiduscheck,
D.R.Kearns.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The solution structure of a type II DNA-binding protein, the bacteriophage
SPO1-encoded transcription factor 1 (TF1), was determined using NMR
spectroscopy. Selective 2H-labeling, 13C-labeling and isotopic heterodimers were
used to distinguish contacts between and within monomers of the dimeric protein.
A total of 1914 distance and dihedral angle constraints derived from NMR
experiments were used in structure calculations using restrained molecular
dynamics and simulated annealing protocols. The ensemble of 30 calculated
structures has a root-mean-square deviation (r.m.s.d.) of 0.9 A, about the
average structure for the backbone atoms, and 1.2 A for all heavy-atoms of the
dimeric core (helices 1 and 2) and the beta-sheets. A severe helix distortion at
residues 92-93 in the middle of helix 3 is associated with r.m.s.d. of
approximately 1.5 A for the helix 3 backbone. Deviations of approximately 5 A or
larger are noted for the very flexible beta-ribbon arms that constitute part of
a proposed DNA-binding region. A structural model of TF1 has been calculated
based on the previously reported crystal structure of the homologous HU protein
and this model was used as the starting structure for calculations. A comparison
between the calculated average solution structure of TF1 and a solution
structure of HU indicates a similarity in the dimeric core (excluding the nine
amino acid residue tail) with pairwise deviations of 2 to 3 A. The largest
deviations between the average structure and the HU solution structure were
found in the beta-ribbon arms, as expected. A 4 A deviation is found at residue
15 of TF1 which is in a loop connecting two helical segments; it has been
reported that substitution of Glu15 by Gly increases the thermostability of TF1.
The homology between TF1 and other proteins of this family leads us to
anticipate similar tertiary structures.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. Superposition of the average solution
structure of TF1 (green) obtained from restrained
molecular dynamics calculations and the average
energy-minimized solution structure of HU (red).
|
 |
Figure 8.
Figure 8. The deviations of C
a
atoms of the average
solution structure of TF1 from the average HU solution
structure.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(1996,
263,
259-268)
copyright 1996.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
F.Orfaniotou,
P.Tzamalis,
A.Thanassoulas,
E.Stefanidi,
A.Zees,
E.Boutou,
M.Vlassi,
G.Nounesis,
and
C.E.Vorgias
(2009).
The stability of the archaeal HU histone-like DNA-binding protein from Thermoplasma volcanium.
|
| |
Extremophiles, 13,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.V.Ram,
R.Naik,
M.Ganguli,
and
S.Habib
(2008).
DNA organization by the apicoplast-targeted bacterial histone-like protein of Plasmodium falciparum.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 36,
5061-5073.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.K.Swinger,
and
P.A.Rice
(2004).
IHF and HU: flexible architects of bent DNA.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol, 14,
28-35.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.K.Swinger,
K.M.Lemberg,
Y.Zhang,
and
P.A.Rice
(2003).
Flexible DNA bending in HU-DNA cocrystal structures.
|
| |
EMBO J, 22,
3749-3760.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Grove,
and
T.C.Saavedra
(2002).
The role of surface-exposed lysines in wrapping DNA about the bacterial histone-like protein HU.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 41,
7597-7603.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.M.Vu,
L.B.Pasternack,
and
D.R.Kearns
(1999).
Specificity of hydroxylmethyluracil-containing DNA for transcription factor 1: structural insights.
|
| |
Biopolymers, 52,
57-63.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Grove,
M.L.Figueiredo,
A.Galeone,
L.Mayol,
and
E.P.Geiduschek
(1997).
Twin hydroxymethyluracil-A base pair steps define the binding site for the DNA-binding protein TF1.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 272,
13084-13087.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.A.Rice
(1997).
Making DNA do a U-turn: IHF and related proteins.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol, 7,
86-93.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|