 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protein binding
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1wm4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Cellular component
|
cellular_component
|
4 terms
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
defense response to fungus
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
protein binding
|
3 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
FEBS Lett
576:91-96
(2004)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Solution structure of coactosin reveals structural homology to ADF/cofilin family proteins.
|
|
M.Hellman,
V.O.Paavilainen,
P.Naumanen,
P.Lappalainen,
A.Annila,
P.Permi.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Coactosin is a small (MW approximately 15 kDa) evolutionarily conserved actin
filament binding protein. It displays remote sequence homology to ADF/cofilin
proteins and to the ADF-H domains of twinfilin and Abp1/drebrin. However,
biochemical analyses have demonstrated that coactosin has a very different role
in actin dynamics from the ones of ADF/cofilin, twinfilin or Abp1/drebrin. To
elucidate the molecular mechanism of coactosin/actin interaction, we determined
the three-dimensional structure of mouse coactosin by multidimensional NMR
spectroscopy. We find that the coactosin structure is homologous to ADF/cofilin
and to the ADF-H domains of twinfilin. Furthermore, the regions that have been
shown to be important for actin filament interactions in ADF/cofilins are
structurally conserved in coactosin suggesting that these two proteins interact
with F-actin through a conserved interface. Our analysis also identifies key
structural differences between these proteins that may account for the
differences in biochemical activities and cellular roles of these proteins.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Overall structure of the coactosin protein. (A)
Main chain representation of the (15) lowest energy structures
superimposed on one another. Residues are color-coded according
to the T[2] relaxation times. Dark blue represents the residues
with T[2] close to the mean value (region indicated with
residue numbers), violet when 35–90% and magenta when over 90%
increase in T[2]‘s were observed and light blue when not
measured. (B) A schematic ribbon representation of coactosin.
The structure is colored from green (N-terminus) via blue to red
to orange (C-terminus). (C) Same as (B) after a 120° rotation
relative to the vertical axis. This and all subsequent figures
were produced with the program MOLMOL [33] unless otherwise
stated.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Representation of the structural basis of the
stabilization of the long α3-helix (A) in coactosin and (C) in
yeast cofilin (highly conserved in the ADF-H domains). In (B)
and (D) are shown the same models as in A and C, respectively,
rotated by 90° relative to y-axis. Locations of the important
residues in the primary structure are shown in Fig. 2A with
circles and are colored according to their position.
Corresponding secondary structure elements are marked with
similar but lighter shading.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the Federation of European Biochemical Societies:
FEBS Lett
(2004,
576,
91-96)
copyright 2004.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.K.Goroncy,
S.Koshiba,
N.Tochio,
T.Tomizawa,
M.Sato,
M.Inoue,
S.Watanabe,
Y.Hayashizaki,
A.Tanaka,
T.Kigawa,
and
S.Yokoyama
(2009).
NMR solution structures of actin depolymerizing factor homology domains.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 18,
2384-2392.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
V.O.Paavilainen,
E.Oksanen,
A.Goldman,
and
P.Lappalainen
(2008).
Structure of the actin-depolymerizing factor homology domain in complex with actin.
|
| |
J Cell Biol, 182,
51-59.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
V.O.Paavilainen,
M.Hellman,
E.Helfer,
M.Bovellan,
A.Annila,
M.F.Carlier,
P.Permi,
and
P.Lappalainen
(2007).
Structural basis and evolutionary origin of actin filament capping by twinfilin.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104,
3113-3118.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Puttonen,
H.Tossavainen,
and
P.Permi
(2006).
Simultaneous determination of one- and two-bond scalar and residual dipolar couplings between 13C', 13Calpha and 15N spins in proteins.
|
| |
Magn Reson Chem, 44,
S168-S176.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Würtz,
M.Hellman,
H.Tossavainen,
and
P.Permi
(2006).
Towards unambiguous assignment of methyl-containing residues by double and triple sensitivity-enhanced HCCmHm-TOCSY experiments.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR, 36,
13-26.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Y.Gorbatyuk,
N.J.Nosworthy,
S.A.Robson,
N.P.Bains,
M.W.Maciejewski,
C.G.Dos Remedios,
and
G.F.King
(2006).
Mapping the phosphoinositide-binding site on chick cofilin explains how PIP2 regulates the cofilin-actin interaction.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 24,
511-522.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Quintero-Monzon,
A.A.Rodal,
B.Strokopytov,
S.C.Almo,
and
B.L.Goode
(2005).
Structural and functional dissection of the Abp1 ADFH actin-binding domain reveals versatile in vivo adapter functions.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell, 16,
3128-3139.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|