 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
response to DNA damage stimulus
|
4 terms
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
nucleotide binding
|
9 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
EMBO J
25:409-419
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Dual role of MutS glutamate 38 in DNA mismatch discrimination and in the authorization of repair.
|
|
J.H.Lebbink,
D.Georgijevic,
G.Natrajan,
A.Fish,
H.H.Winterwerp,
T.K.Sixma,
N.de Wind.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
MutS plays a critical role in DNA mismatch repair in Escherichia coli by binding
to mismatches and initiating repair in an ATP-dependent manner. Mutational
analysis of a highly conserved glutamate, Glu38, has revealed its role in
mismatch recognition by enabling MutS to discriminate between homoduplex and
mismatched DNA. Crystal structures of MutS have shown that Glu38 forms a
hydrogen bond to one of the mismatched bases. In this study, we have analyzed
the crystal structures, DNA binding and the response to ATP binding of three
Glu38 mutants. While confirming the role of the negative charge in initial
discrimination, we show that in vivo mismatch repair can proceed even when
discrimination is low. We demonstrate that the formation of a hydrogen bond by
residue 38 to the mismatched base authorizes repair by inducing intramolecular
signaling, which results in the inhibition of rapid hydrolysis of distally bound
ATP. This allows formation of the stable MutS-ATP-DNA clamp, a key intermediate
in triggering downstream repair events.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1 Crystal structures of wild-type MutS and E38 variants.
(A) Schematic view of the E. coli MutS dimer, with the
mismatch-binding monomer A shown in yellow, the supporting
monomer B shown in orange and the mismatch containing DNA in
blue. (B) Superposition of the mismatch-binding clamp domains
and DNA of wild-type and mutant MutS obtained by superposing the
C atoms
of the mismatch-binding monomer A of all the structures. (C) G.T
mismatch binding by the wild-type MutS. (D) G.T mismatch binding
by the E38T mutant, with the bound water molecule in red, along
with its mF[o]-DF[c] map contoured at 3 (in
green). (E) G.T mismatch binding by the E38Q mutant. (F) G.T
mismatch binding by E38A, shown with the bound water molecule
(in red) along with its mF[o]-DF[c] density map contoured at 3
(in
green). Dashed red lines indicate hydrogen bonds and residue 38
in panels C-F is shown in purple. All figures were made using
PyMOL (Copyright© 2004 DeLano Scientific).
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5 Kinetic response to ATP binding of wild-type MutS and
E38 mutants. (A) Magnitude of burst amplitude of ADP formation
during the first hydrolytic turnover in a rapid quench ATPase
assay in the absence and presence of DNA containing a G.T
mismatch. (B) Kinetics of ATP-induced MutS release from
mismatched (mm) DNA with a free end and (C) from double
end-blocked mismatched DNA determined by SPR.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
EMBO J
(2006,
25,
409-419)
copyright 2006.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.H.Lebbink,
A.Fish,
A.Reumer,
G.Natrajan,
H.H.Winterwerp,
and
T.K.Sixma
(2010).
Magnesium coordination controls the molecular switch function of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 285,
13131-13141.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Zhai,
and
M.M.Hingorani
(2010).
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6 DNA binding kinetics reveal a mechanism of targeting sites for DNA mismatch repair.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107,
680-685.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.E.Sass,
C.Lanyi,
K.Weninger,
and
D.A.Erie
(2010).
Single-molecule FRET TACKLE reveals highly dynamic mismatched DNA-MutS complexes.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 49,
3174-3190.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Tessmer,
Y.Yang,
J.Zhai,
C.Du,
P.Hsieh,
M.M.Hingorani,
and
D.A.Erie
(2008).
Mechanism of MutS searching for DNA mismatches and signaling repair.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 283,
36646-36654.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Okhrimenko,
and
I.Jelesarov
(2008).
A survey of the year 2006 literature on applications of isothermal titration calorimetry.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit, 21,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Hsieh,
and
K.Yamane
(2008).
DNA mismatch repair: molecular mechanism, cancer, and ageing.
|
| |
Mech Ageing Dev, 129,
391-407.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Jacobs-Palmer,
and
M.M.Hingorani
(2007).
The effects of nucleotides on MutS-DNA binding kinetics clarify the role of MutS ATPase activity in mismatch repair.
|
| |
J Mol Biol, 366,
1087-1098.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.L.Rich,
and
D.G.Myszka
(2007).
Survey of the year 2006 commercial optical biosensor literature.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit, 20,
300-366.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.D.Lee,
J.A.Surtees,
and
E.Alani
(2007).
Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2-MSH3 and MSH2-MSH6 complexes display distinct requirements for DNA binding domain I in mismatch recognition.
|
| |
J Mol Biol, 366,
53-66.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.F.Holmes,
K.D.Scarpinato,
S.D.McCulloch,
R.M.Schaaper,
and
T.A.Kunkel
(2007).
Specialized mismatch repair function of Glu339 in the Phe-X-Glu motif of yeast Msh6.
|
| |
DNA Repair (Amst), 6,
293-303.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Plotz,
S.Zeuzem,
and
J.Raedle
(2006).
DNA mismatch repair and Lynch syndrome.
|
| |
J Mol Histol, 37,
271-283.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Manelyte,
C.Urbanke,
L.Giron-Monzon,
and
P.Friedhoff
(2006).
Structural and functional analysis of the MutS C-terminal tetramerization domain.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 34,
5270-5279.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.H.Jun,
T.G.Kim,
and
C.Ban
(2006).
DNA mismatch repair system. Classical and fresh roles.
|
| |
FEBS J, 273,
1609-1619.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|