spacer
spacer
Go to PDB code: 
protein dna_rna ligands metals Protein-protein interface(s) links
DNA binding PDB id
1w7a
Jmol
Contents
Protein chains
791 a.a. *
DNA/RNA
Ligands
ATP ×2
Metals
_MG
Waters ×266
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
1w7a
Name: DNA binding
Title: Atp bound muts
Structure: DNA mismatch repair protein muts. Chain: a, b. Fragment: residues 1-800. Engineered: yes. Other_details: DNA oligomer containing gt mismatch adenosin triphosphate (atp). 5'-d( Ap Gp Cp Tp Gp Cp Cp Ap Gp Gp Cp Ap Cp Cp Ap Gp Tp Gp Tp Cp Ap Gp Cp Gp Tp Cp Cp Tp Ap chain: e.
Source: Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 469008. Synthetic: yes. Synthetic: yes
Biol. unit: Tetramer (from PDB file)
Resolution:
2.27Å     R-factor:   0.217     R-free:   0.253
Authors: M.H.Lamers,D.Georgijevic,J.Lebbink,H.H.K.Winterwerp,B.Agiani N.De Wind,T.K.Sixma
Key ref:
M.H.Lamers et al. (2004). ATP increases the affinity between MutS ATPase domains. Implications for ATP hydrolysis and conformational changes. J Biol Chem, 279, 43879-43885. PubMed id: 15297450 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M406380200
Date:
31-Aug-04     Release date:   10-Sep-04    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chains
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P23909  (MUTS_ECOLI) -  DNA mismatch repair protein mutS
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
853 a.a.
791 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain

 Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation 
  GO annot!
  Biological process     response to DNA damage stimulus   4 terms 
  Biochemical function     nucleotide binding     9 terms  

 

 
DOI no: 10.1074/jbc.M406380200 J Biol Chem 279:43879-43885 (2004)
PubMed id: 15297450  
 
 
ATP increases the affinity between MutS ATPase domains. Implications for ATP hydrolysis and conformational changes.
M.H.Lamers, D.Georgijevic, J.H.Lebbink, H.H.Winterwerp, B.Agianian, N.de Wind, T.K.Sixma.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
MutS is the key protein of the Escherichia coli DNA mismatch repair system. It recognizes mispaired and unpaired bases and has intrinsic ATPase activity. ATP binding after mismatch recognition by MutS serves as a switch that enables MutL binding and the subsequent initiation of mismatch repair. However, the mechanism of this switch is poorly understood. We have investigated the effects of ATP binding on the MutS structure. Crystallographic studies of ATP-soaked crystals of MutS show a trapped intermediate, with ATP in the nucleotide-binding site. Local rearrangements of several residues around the nucleotide-binding site suggest a movement of the two ATPase domains of the MutS dimer toward each other. Analytical ultracentrifugation experiments confirm such a rearrangement, showing increased affinity between the ATPase domains upon ATP binding and decreased affinity in the presence of ADP. Mutations of specific residues in the nucleotide-binding domain reduce the dimer affinity of the ATPase domains. In addition, ATP-induced release of DNA is strongly reduced in these mutants, suggesting that the two activities are coupled. Hence, it seems plausible that modulation of the affinity between ATPase domains is the driving force for conformational changes in the MutS dimer. These changes are driven by distinct amino acids in the nucleotide-binding site and form the basis for long-range interactions between the ATPase domains and DNA-binding domains and subsequent binding of MutL and initiation of mismatch repair.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 1.
FIG. 1. Structure of MutS in complex with DNA and ATP. A, overview of the complex with ATPase domains of monomer A and B colored green and blue, respectively. Electron density covering the ATP molecules is colored dark blue. Signature loops are in red, and missing residues are transparent. The rest of the molecule is colored gray. DNA is dark red. B, enlarged view of A showing the position of the nucleotides and signature loops. C, overview of the ATPase dimer interface showing only the ATPase domains. D and E, detailed view of the nucleotide-binding site of monomer A binding ADP or ATP, respectively. Monomer A is colored green, and the opposing monomer B is blue, with missing residues transparent. Note the rotation of residues Asn616 and His728 and the stabilization of Ser668 and the larger part of the loop on which it resides. F, nucleotide-binding site of monomer B binding ATP. Asn616, indicated as transparent, is poorly defined in electron density.
Figure 3.
FIG. 3. Modeling of conformational changes induced by ATP binding. A, model of MutS after superposition of the MutS ATPase domains on the ATPase domains of RAD50-ATP (see "Discussion"). In addition to an 5 Å translation, an 25° degrees rotation of the two monomers toward one another is observed. B-D, model for ATP-induced DNA release. In the absence of DNA (B), the DNA-binding domains (clamp and mismatch, indicated by "C" and "M") are flexible and opened up to allow the DNA to enter. When a mismatch is bound (shown in yellow), the DNA is kinked and surrounded by the two monomers (C). Subsequent ATP binding (D) causes a further closing of the clamp. To avoid the clashing of the mismatch binding domains, they are rotated away from the DNA, leaving MutS as a sliding clamp on the DNA.
 
  The above figures are reprinted by permission from the ASBMB: J Biol Chem (2004, 279, 43879-43885) copyright 2004.  
  Figures were selected by the author.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
20167596 J.H.Lebbink, A.Fish, A.Reumer, G.Natrajan, H.H.Winterwerp, and T.K.Sixma (2010).
Magnesium coordination controls the molecular switch function of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS.
  J Biol Chem, 285, 13131-13141.
PDB codes: 2wtu 3k0s
18854319 I.Tessmer, Y.Yang, J.Zhai, C.Du, P.Hsieh, M.M.Hingorani, and D.A.Erie (2008).
Mechanism of MutS searching for DNA mismatches and signaling repair.
  J Biol Chem, 283, 36646-36654.  
18406444 P.Hsieh, and K.Yamane (2008).
DNA mismatch repair: molecular mechanism, cancer, and ageing.
  Mech Ageing Dev, 129, 391-407.  
18673453 S.Acharya (2008).
Mutations in the signature motif in MutS affect ATP-induced clamp formation and mismatch repair.
  Mol Microbiol, 69, 1544-1559.  
18078545 C.D.Putnam, M.Hammel, G.L.Hura, and J.A.Tainer (2007).
X-ray solution scattering (SAXS) combined with crystallography and computation: defining accurate macromolecular structures, conformations and assemblies in solution.
  Q Rev Biophys, 40, 191-285.  
17207499 E.Jacobs-Palmer, and M.M.Hingorani (2007).
The effects of nucleotides on MutS-DNA binding kinetics clarify the role of MutS ATPase activity in mismatch repair.
  J Mol Biol, 366, 1087-1098.  
17573527 S.S.Shell, C.D.Putnam, and R.D.Kolodner (2007).
Chimeric Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh6 protein with an Msh3 mispair-binding domain combines properties of both proteins.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 10956-10961.  
16821093 G.Plotz, S.Zeuzem, and J.Raedle (2006).
DNA mismatch repair and Lynch syndrome.
  J Mol Histol, 37, 271-283.  
16407973 J.H.Lebbink, D.Georgijevic, G.Natrajan, A.Fish, H.H.Winterwerp, T.K.Sixma, and N.de Wind (2006).
Dual role of MutS glutamate 38 in DNA mismatch discrimination and in the authorization of repair.
  EMBO J, 25, 409-419.
PDB codes: 1wb9 1wbb 1wbd
16612326 J.Jiricny (2006).
The multifaceted mismatch-repair system.
  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 7, 335-346.  
17012287 L.Manelyte, C.Urbanke, L.Giron-Monzon, and P.Friedhoff (2006).
Structural and functional analysis of the MutS C-terminal tetramerization domain.
  Nucleic Acids Res, 34, 5270-5279.  
16623698 S.H.Jun, T.G.Kim, and C.Ban (2006).
DNA mismatch repair system. Classical and fresh roles.
  FEBS J, 273, 1609-1619.  
16935885 S.W.Matson, and A.B.Robertson (2006).
The UvrD helicase and its modulation by the mismatch repair protein MutL.
  Nucleic Acids Res, 34, 4089-4097.  
15746000 S.Banerjee, and H.Flores-Rozas (2005).
Cadmium inhibits mismatch repair by blocking the ATPase activity of the MSH2-MSH6 complex.
  Nucleic Acids Res, 33, 1410-1419.  
15952900 T.A.Kunkel, and D.A.Erie (2005).
DNA mismatch repair.
  Annu Rev Biochem, 74, 681-710.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.