 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.6.3.2.19
- Ubiquitin--protein ligase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
ATP + ubiquitin + protein lysine = AMP + diphosphate + protein N-ubiquityllysine
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ATP
|
+
|
ubiquitin
|
+
|
protein lysine
|
=
|
AMP
|
+
|
diphosphate
|
+
|
protein N-ubiquityllysine
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Cellular component
|
proteasome complex
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
response to stress
|
10 terms
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
nucleotide binding
|
7 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
279:47139-47147
(2004)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Solution structure of the flexible class II ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc1 provides insights for polyubiquitin chain assembly.
|
|
N.Merkley,
G.S.Shaw.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
E2 conjugating enzymes form a thiol ester intermediate with ubiquitin, which is
subsequently transferred to a substrate protein targeted for degradation. While
all E2 proteins comprise a catalytic domain where the thiol ester is formed,
several E2s (class II) have C-terminal extensions proposed to control substrate
recognition, dimerization, or polyubiquitin chain formation. Here we present the
novel solution structure of the class II E2 conjugating enzyme Ubc1 from
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The structure shows the N-terminal catalytic domain
adopts an alpha/beta fold typical of other E2 proteins. This domain is
physically separated from its C-terminal domain by a 22-residue flexible tether.
The C-terminal domain adopts a three-helix bundle that we have identified as an
ubiquitin-associated domain (UBA). NMR chemical shift perturbation experiments
show this UBA domain interacts in a regioselective manner with ubiquitin. This
two-domain structure of Ubc1 was used to identify other UBA-containing class II
E2 proteins, including human E2-25K, that likely have a similar architecture and
to determine the role of the UBA domain in facilitating polyubiquitin chain
formation.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
FIG. 1. Ubc1 contains two structurally distinct domains
connected by a flexible tether. A, backbone superposition (N,
Ca, C') of the secondary structure of the N-terminal 150
residues (catalytic domain) of the 21 lowest energy structures
of Ubc1. Since the 22-residue tether region is flexible, the N-
and C-terminal domains do not have a rigid orientation with
respect to each other. In this figure the N-terminal domain is
superimposed, and the C-terminal domain adopts many different
relative orientations. B, residues that define the secondary
structure of the N-terminal domain (catalytic domain) were
superimposed (residues 5-13, 22-26, 34-40, 51-58, 68-70,
102-113, 124-131, and 134-147). r.m.s.d. for the backbone atoms
relative to a mean structure was 0.78 ± 0.12 Å. C,
ribbon diagram of Ubc1 catalytic domain (residues 1-150);
helices 1, 2, 3, and 4 are
colored blue, and strands 1, 2, 3, and 4, which
form the central -sheet region, are
colored magenta. D, residues from the regular secondary
structure for the C terminus (residues 151-215) of Ubc1 were
superimposed (residues 170-177, 183-191, and 204-213). r.m.s.d.
for the backbone atoms relative to a mean structure of this
region was 0.35 ± 0.06 Å. E, C-terminal domain
(residues 170-215) of Ubc1 represented as a ribbon diagram
showing the three helices 5, 6, and 7 in
blue. For the entire structure no violations were observed >0.5
Å for the distance restraints or >5° for the dihedral
restraints.
|
 |
Figure 5.
FIG. 5. Surface representations showing the ubiquitin
binding sites on the UBA domains from Ubc1 and HHR23A and the
UBA binding sites on ubiquitin. A, surface representation of the
UBA from Ubc1 where the blue regions indicate surface residues
having chemical shift changes,   > 0.05 ppm, upon
ubiquitin binding. B and C, similar representations for HHR23A
UBA(1) (Protein Data Bank code 1IFY [PDB]
) and UBA(2) (Protein Data Bank code 1DV0 [PDB]
) for ubiquitin binding. The surfaces for UBA domains from
HHR23A are shown as described by Mueller et al. (61). D, surface
diagram of ubiquitin where the blue regions represent surface
residues that underwent chemical shift changes,   > 0.03
ppm, upon Ubc1 binding. E, surface diagram of ubiquitin in which
the magenta regions represent the residues that underwent a
change in chemical shift upon binding UBA(2) as described by
Mueller et al. (61). F, surface diagram of ubiquitin in which
the green regions represent the amide cross-peaks that underwent
a decrease in intensity upon thiol ester formation with
truncated Ubc1 as described by Hamilton et al. (63).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2004,
279,
47139-47147)
copyright 2004.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.Patil,
K.Kinoshita,
and
H.Nakamura
(2010).
Hub promiscuity in protein-protein interaction networks.
|
| |
Int J Mol Sci, 11,
1930-1943.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.M.Wenzel,
K.E.Stoll,
and
R.E.Klevit
(2010).
E2s: structurally economical and functionally replete.
|
| |
Biochem J, 433,
31-42.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Sakata,
T.Satoh,
S.Yamamoto,
Y.Yamaguchi,
M.Yagi-Utsumi,
E.Kurimoto,
K.Tanaka,
S.Wakatsuki,
and
K.Kato
(2010).
Crystal structure of UbcH5b~ubiquitin intermediate: insight into the formation of the self-assembled E2~Ub conjugates.
|
| |
Structure, 18,
138-147.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.C.Rodrigo-Brenni,
S.A.Foster,
and
D.O.Morgan
(2010).
Catalysis of lysine 48-specific ubiquitin chain assembly by residues in E2 and ubiquitin.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 39,
548-559.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Ju,
W.Bocik,
A.Majumdar,
and
J.R.Tolman
(2010).
Solution structure and dynamics of human ubiquitin conjugating enzyme Ube2g2.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
1291-1301.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.E.French,
B.R.Kretzmann,
and
L.Hicke
(2009).
Regulation of the RSP5 ubiquitin ligase by an intrinsic ubiquitin-binding site.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 284,
12071-12079.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Ye,
and
M.Rape
(2009).
Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 10,
755-764.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.C.Shih,
I.Stoica,
and
N.K.Goto
(2008).
Investigation of the utility of selective methyl protonation for determination of membrane protein structures.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR, 42,
49-58.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.E.Christensen,
P.S.Brzovic,
and
R.E.Klevit
(2007).
E2-BRCA1 RING interactions dictate synthesis of mono- or specific polyubiquitin chain linkages.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol, 14,
941-948.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.C.Rodrigo-Brenni,
and
D.O.Morgan
(2007).
Sequential E2s drive polyubiquitin chain assembly on APC targets.
|
| |
Cell, 130,
127-139.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.A.Howard,
P.Sharma,
C.Hajjar,
K.A.Caldwell,
G.A.Caldwell,
R.du Breuil,
R.Moore,
and
L.Boyd
(2007).
Ubiquitin conjugating enzymes participate in polyglutamine protein aggregation.
|
| |
BMC Cell Biol, 8,
32.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Flierman,
C.S.Coleman,
C.M.Pickart,
T.A.Rapoport,
and
V.Chau
(2006).
E2-25K mediates US11-triggered retro-translocation of MHC class I heavy chains in a permeabilized cell system.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103,
11589-11594.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.R.Cavey,
S.H.Ralston,
P.W.Sheppard,
B.Ciani,
T.R.Gallagher,
J.E.Long,
M.S.Searle,
and
R.Layfield
(2006).
Loss of ubiquitin binding is a unifying mechanism by which mutations of SQSTM1 cause Paget's disease of bone.
|
| |
Calcif Tissue Int, 78,
271-277.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Hicke,
H.L.Schubert,
and
C.P.Hill
(2005).
Ubiquitin-binding domains.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 6,
610-621.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|