 |
PDBsum entry 1ssj
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
279:24552-24560
(2004)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Effect of bulky lesions on DNA: solution structure of a DNA duplex containing a cholesterol adduct.
|
|
I.Gómez-Pinto,
E.Cubero,
S.G.Kalko,
V.Monaco,
G.van der Marel,
J.H.van Boom,
M.Orozco,
C.González.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The three-dimensional solution structure of two DNA decamers of sequence
d(CCACXGGAAC)-(GTTCCGGTGG) with a modified nucleotide containing a cholesterol
derivative (X) in its C1 '(chol)alpha or C1 '(chol)beta diastereoisomer form has
been determined by using NMR and restrained molecular dynamics. This DNA
derivative is recognized with high efficiency by the UvrB protein, which is part
of the bacterial nucleotide excision repair, and the alpha anomer is repaired
more efficiently than the beta one. The structures of the two decamers have been
determined from accurate distance constraints obtained from a complete
relaxation matrix analysis of the NOE intensities and torsion angle constraints
derived from J-coupling constants. The structures have been refined with
molecular dynamics methods, including explicit solvent and applying the particle
mesh Ewald method to properly evaluate the long range electrostatic
interactions. These calculations converge to well defined structures whose
conformation is intermediate between the A- and B-DNA families as judged by the
root mean square deviation but with sugar puckerings and groove shapes
corresponding to a distorted B-conformation. Both duplex adducts exhibit
intercalation of the cholesterol group from the major groove of the helix and
displacement of the guanine base opposite the modified nucleotide. Based on
these structures and molecular dynamics calculations, we propose a tentative
model for the recognition of damaged DNA substrates by the UvrB protein.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 8.
FIG. 8. Top, molecular interaction potential (cMIP) maps
for the three duplexes (contours correspond to interaction
energies of -5 kcal/mol). Bottom, regions of preferential of
hydration (contours correspond to a density of 3.5 g/ml).
|
 |
Figure 9.
FIG. 9. Details of the model of UvrB-DNA interaction. Left,
interaction of UvrB with an undamaged DNA duplex. Right, model
of the interaction with a damaged substrate in the proposed
"active" conformation.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2004,
279,
24552-24560)
copyright 2004.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
K.Wagner,
G.F.Moolenaar,
and
N.Goosen
(2011).
Role of the insertion domain and the zinc-finger motif of Escherichia coli UvrA in damage recognition and ATP hydrolysis.
|
| |
DNA Repair (Amst),
10,
483-496.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.R.Dahmani,
P.Schneeberger,
and
I.M.Kramer
(2009).
Analysis of students' aptitude to provide meaning to images that represent cellular components at the molecular level.
|
| |
CBE Life Sci Educ,
8,
226-238.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Pérez,
F.Lankas,
F.J.Luque,
and
M.Orozco
(2008).
Towards a molecular dynamics consensus view of B-DNA flexibility.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
36,
2379-2394.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |