 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structural protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1q8g
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Structural protein
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Nmr structure of human cofilin
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Cofilin, non-muscle isoform. Chain: a. Synonym: 18 kda phosphoprotein, p18. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: cfl1 or cfl. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008.
|
|
NMR struc:
|
 |
20 models
|
 |
|
Authors:
|
 |
B.J.Pope,K.M.Zierler-Gould,R.Kuhne,A.G.Weeds,L.J.Ball
|
Key ref:
|
 |
B.J.Pope
et al.
(2004).
Solution structure of human cofilin: actin binding, pH sensitivity, and relationship to actin-depolymerizing factor.
J Biol Chem,
279,
4840-4848.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
21-Aug-03
|
Release date:
|
06-Jul-04
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P23528
(COF1_HUMAN) -
Cofilin-1
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
166 a.a.
166 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Cellular component
|
intracellular
|
10 terms
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
response to virus
|
8 terms
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
protein binding
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
279:4840-4848
(2004)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Solution structure of human cofilin: actin binding, pH sensitivity, and relationship to actin-depolymerizing factor.
|
|
B.J.Pope,
K.M.Zierler-Gould,
R.Kühne,
A.G.Weeds,
L.J.Ball.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Human actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF) and cofilin are pH-sensitive,
actin-depolymerizing proteins. Although 72% identical in sequence, ADF has a
much higher depolymerizing activity than cofilin at pH 8. To understand this, we
solved the structure of human cofilin using nuclear magnetic resonance and
compared it with human ADF. Important sequence differences between vertebrate
ADF/cofilins were correlated with unique structural determinants in the
F-actin-binding site to account for differences in biochemical activities of the
two proteins. Cofilin has a short beta-strand at the C terminus, not found in
ADF, which packs against strands beta3/beta4, changing the environment around
Lys96, a residue essential for F-actin binding. A salt bridge involving His133
and Asp98 (Glu98 in ADF) may explain the pH sensitivity of human cofilin and
ADF; these two residues are fully conserved in vertebrate ADF/cofilins. Chemical
shift perturbations identified residues that (i) differ in their chemical
environments between wild type cofilin and mutants S3D, which has greatly
reduced G-actin binding, and K96Q, which does not bind F-actin; (ii) are
affected when G-actin binds cofilin; and (iii) are affected by pH change from 6
to 8. Many residues affected by G-actin binding also show perturbation in the
mutants or in response to pH. Our evidence suggests the involvement of residues
133-138 of strand beta5 in all of the activities examined. Because residues in
beta5 are perturbed by mutations that affect both G-actin and F-actin binding,
this strand forms a "boundary" or "bridge" between the
proposed F- and G-actin-binding sites.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
FIG. 2. A and B, ribbon diagrams of the lowest energy
structure in two orthogonal orientations. Residues involved in
the salt bridge, Asp98 and His133 are labeled in red. The red
arrows in A indicate the positions of Ser3 and Lys96, whose
mutation affects G-actin and F-actin binding, respectively. C
and D, cofilin and ADF, respectively, in similar orientations
(-90° rotation of A) to show residues that determine
differences between these two vertebrate isoforms. The positions
of the main structural elements are marked. Red regions show
68-70, YAT in cofilin and FKH in ADF (i), 143-145, VKD and LNR
(ii), 147-149, CTL and 147-148 CI in ADF taking account of the
single residue difference between the two proteins (iii), and
157-161, AVISL and 156-160 LIVAF in ADF (iv). The aromatic side
chains of Tyr68 (cofilin) and Phe^68 (ADF) are shown in red,
whereas His133 and Asp98 (Glu in ADF) are in blue and yellow,
respectively. The blue arrowheads show the reduced length of the
loop region (residues 47-53) in cofilin.
|
 |
Figure 4.
FIG. 4. Human cofilin residues showing CSPs in response to
mutation K96Q (A), complexation of mutant K96Q with G-actin (B),
mutation S3D (D), increased pH on mutant S3D (E), increased pH
on w.t. (F). The strongest CSPs are in gold, moderate CSPs are
red, and weaker CSPs are in blue. C, residues in K96Q broadened
but unshifted in 1:1 complexes with G-actin. Although the
mutations have long range effects, their influence is restricted
to the half of the protein where the mutation lies. Both point
mutations affect residues in 5. G and H, orthogonal
views showing residues in K96Q whose NMR signals become
broadened (green) or show strong CSPs (gold) upon actin binding.
These are mainly located in 4 and 5 in the
region centered around Tyr117. The second orientation shows that
the actin binding site is asymmetric over the top half of the
molecule.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2004,
279,
4840-4848)
copyright 2004.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.Muhlrad,
E.E.Grintsevich,
and
E.Reisler
(2011).
Polycation induced actin bundles.
|
| |
Biophys Chem, 155,
45-51.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.W.Bernstein,
and
J.R.Bamburg
(2010).
ADF/cofilin: a functional node in cell biology.
|
| |
Trends Cell Biol, 20,
187-195.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Thouverey,
A.Strzelecka-Kiliszek,
M.Balcerzak,
R.Buchet,
and
S.Pikula
(2009).
Matrix vesicles originate from apical membrane microvilli of mineralizing osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells.
|
| |
J Cell Biochem, 106,
127-138.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.W.Nam
(2009).
GRA Proteins of Toxoplasma gondii: Maintenance of Host-Parasite Interactions across the Parasitophorous Vacuolar Membrane.
|
| |
Korean J Parasitol, 47,
S29-S37.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Ono,
and
S.Ono
(2009).
Actin-ADF/cofilin rod formation in Caenorhabditis elegans muscle requires a putative F-actin binding site of ADF/cofilin at the C-terminus.
|
| |
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 66,
398-408.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Papalouka,
D.A.Arvanitis,
E.Vafiadaki,
M.Mavroidis,
S.A.Papadodima,
C.A.Spiliopoulou,
D.T.Kremastinos,
E.G.Kranias,
and
D.Sanoudou
(2009).
Muscle LIM protein interacts with cofilin 2 and regulates F-actin dynamics in cardiac and skeletal muscle.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol, 29,
6046-6058.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Frantz,
G.Barreiro,
L.Dominguez,
X.Chen,
R.Eddy,
J.Condeelis,
M.J.Kelly,
M.P.Jacobson,
and
D.L.Barber
(2008).
Cofilin is a pH sensor for actin free barbed end formation: role of phosphoinositide binding.
|
| |
J Cell Biol, 183,
865-879.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.E.Grintsevich,
S.A.Benchaar,
D.Warshaviak,
P.Boontheung,
F.Halgand,
J.P.Whitelegge,
K.F.Faull,
R.R.Loo,
D.Sept,
J.A.Loo,
and
E.Reisler
(2008).
Mapping the cofilin binding site on yeast G-actin by chemical cross-linking.
|
| |
J Mol Biol, 377,
395-409.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.K.Kamal,
and
M.R.Chance
(2008).
Modeling of protein binary complexes using structural mass spectrometry data.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 17,
79-94.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Srivastava,
G.Barreiro,
S.Groscurth,
A.R.Gingras,
B.T.Goult,
D.R.Critchley,
M.J.Kelly,
M.P.Jacobson,
and
D.L.Barber
(2008).
Structural model and functional significance of pH-dependent talin-actin binding for focal adhesion remodeling.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105,
14436-14441.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.K.Kamal,
S.A.Benchaar,
K.Takamoto,
E.Reisler,
and
M.R.Chance
(2007).
Three-dimensional structure of cofilin bound to monomeric actin derived by structural mass spectrometry data.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104,
7910-7915.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.C.Almo,
J.B.Bonanno,
J.M.Sauder,
S.Emtage,
T.P.Dilorenzo,
V.Malashkevich,
S.R.Wasserman,
S.Swaminathan,
S.Eswaramoorthy,
R.Agarwal,
D.Kumaran,
M.Madegowda,
S.Ragumani,
Y.Patskovsky,
J.Alvarado,
U.A.Ramagopal,
J.Faber-Barata,
M.R.Chance,
A.Sali,
A.Fiser,
Z.Y.Zhang,
D.S.Lawrence,
and
S.K.Burley
(2007).
Structural genomics of protein phosphatases.
|
| |
J Struct Funct Genomics, 8,
121-140.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.K.Jung,
D.G.Jeong,
T.S.Yoon,
J.H.Kim,
S.E.Ryu,
and
S.J.Kim
(2007).
Crystal structure of human slingshot phosphatase 2.
|
| |
Proteins, 68,
408-412.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Wang,
R.Eddy,
and
J.Condeelis
(2007).
The cofilin pathway in breast cancer invasion and metastasis.
|
| |
Nat Rev Cancer, 7,
429-440.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Pavlov,
A.Muhlrad,
J.Cooper,
M.Wear,
and
E.Reisler
(2006).
Severing of F-actin by yeast cofilin is pH-independent.
|
| |
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 63,
533-542.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.J.Ahn,
S.Kim,
H.E.Kim,
and
H.W.Nam
(2006).
Interactions between secreted GRA proteins and host cell proteins across the paratitophorous vacuolar membrane in the parasitism of Toxoplasma gondii.
|
| |
Korean J Parasitol, 44,
303-312.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Y.Gorbatyuk,
N.J.Nosworthy,
S.A.Robson,
N.P.Bains,
M.W.Maciejewski,
C.G.Dos Remedios,
and
G.F.King
(2006).
Mapping the phosphoinositide-binding site on chick cofilin explains how PIP2 regulates the cofilin-actin interaction.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 24,
511-522.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Schüler,
A.K.Mueller,
and
K.Matuschewski
(2005).
A Plasmodium actin-depolymerizing factor that binds exclusively to actin monomers.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell, 16,
4013-4023.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Quintero-Monzon,
A.A.Rodal,
B.Strokopytov,
S.C.Almo,
and
B.L.Goode
(2005).
Structural and functional dissection of the Abp1 ADFH actin-binding domain reveals versatile in vivo adapter functions.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell, 16,
3128-3139.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.W.Bernstein,
and
J.R.Bamburg
(2004).
A proposed mechanism for cell polarization with no external cues.
|
| |
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 58,
96.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.O.Paavilainen,
E.Bertling,
S.Falck,
and
P.Lappalainen
(2004).
Regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics by actin-monomer-binding proteins.
|
| |
Trends Cell Biol, 14,
386-394.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Li,
X.Liu,
Z.Lou,
X.Duan,
H.Wu,
Y.Liu,
and
Z.Rao
(2004).
Crystal structure of human coactosin-like protein at 1.9 A resolution.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 13,
2845-2851.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|