spacer
spacer
Go to PDB code: 
protein links
Structural protein PDB id
1q8g
Jmol
Contents
Protein chain
166 a.a. *
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
1q8g
Name: Structural protein
Title: Nmr structure of human cofilin
Structure: Cofilin, non-muscle isoform. Chain: a. Synonym: 18 kda phosphoprotein, p18. Engineered: yes
Source: Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: cfl1 or cfl. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008.
NMR struc: 20 models
Authors: B.J.Pope,K.M.Zierler-Gould,R.Kuhne,A.G.Weeds,L.J.Ball
Key ref:
B.J.Pope et al. (2004). Solution structure of human cofilin: actin binding, pH sensitivity, and relationship to actin-depolymerizing factor. J Biol Chem, 279, 4840-4848. PubMed id: 14627701 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M310148200
Date:
21-Aug-03     Release date:   06-Jul-04    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P23528  (COF1_HUMAN) -  Cofilin-1
Seq:
Struc:
166 a.a.
166 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain

 Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation 
  GO annot!
  Cellular component     intracellular   10 terms 
  Biological process     response to virus   8 terms 
  Biochemical function     protein binding     2 terms  

 

 
DOI no: 10.1074/jbc.M310148200 J Biol Chem 279:4840-4848 (2004)
PubMed id: 14627701  
 
 
Solution structure of human cofilin: actin binding, pH sensitivity, and relationship to actin-depolymerizing factor.
B.J.Pope, K.M.Zierler-Gould, R.Kühne, A.G.Weeds, L.J.Ball.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Human actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF) and cofilin are pH-sensitive, actin-depolymerizing proteins. Although 72% identical in sequence, ADF has a much higher depolymerizing activity than cofilin at pH 8. To understand this, we solved the structure of human cofilin using nuclear magnetic resonance and compared it with human ADF. Important sequence differences between vertebrate ADF/cofilins were correlated with unique structural determinants in the F-actin-binding site to account for differences in biochemical activities of the two proteins. Cofilin has a short beta-strand at the C terminus, not found in ADF, which packs against strands beta3/beta4, changing the environment around Lys96, a residue essential for F-actin binding. A salt bridge involving His133 and Asp98 (Glu98 in ADF) may explain the pH sensitivity of human cofilin and ADF; these two residues are fully conserved in vertebrate ADF/cofilins. Chemical shift perturbations identified residues that (i) differ in their chemical environments between wild type cofilin and mutants S3D, which has greatly reduced G-actin binding, and K96Q, which does not bind F-actin; (ii) are affected when G-actin binds cofilin; and (iii) are affected by pH change from 6 to 8. Many residues affected by G-actin binding also show perturbation in the mutants or in response to pH. Our evidence suggests the involvement of residues 133-138 of strand beta5 in all of the activities examined. Because residues in beta5 are perturbed by mutations that affect both G-actin and F-actin binding, this strand forms a "boundary" or "bridge" between the proposed F- and G-actin-binding sites.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 2.
FIG. 2. A and B, ribbon diagrams of the lowest energy structure in two orthogonal orientations. Residues involved in the salt bridge, Asp98 and His133 are labeled in red. The red arrows in A indicate the positions of Ser3 and Lys96, whose mutation affects G-actin and F-actin binding, respectively. C and D, cofilin and ADF, respectively, in similar orientations (-90° rotation of A) to show residues that determine differences between these two vertebrate isoforms. The positions of the main structural elements are marked. Red regions show 68-70, YAT in cofilin and FKH in ADF (i), 143-145, VKD and LNR (ii), 147-149, CTL and 147-148 CI in ADF taking account of the single residue difference between the two proteins (iii), and 157-161, AVISL and 156-160 LIVAF in ADF (iv). The aromatic side chains of Tyr68 (cofilin) and Phe^68 (ADF) are shown in red, whereas His133 and Asp98 (Glu in ADF) are in blue and yellow, respectively. The blue arrowheads show the reduced length of the loop region (residues 47-53) in cofilin.
Figure 4.
FIG. 4. Human cofilin residues showing CSPs in response to mutation K96Q (A), complexation of mutant K96Q with G-actin (B), mutation S3D (D), increased pH on mutant S3D (E), increased pH on w.t. (F). The strongest CSPs are in gold, moderate CSPs are red, and weaker CSPs are in blue. C, residues in K96Q broadened but unshifted in 1:1 complexes with G-actin. Although the mutations have long range effects, their influence is restricted to the half of the protein where the mutation lies. Both point mutations affect residues in 5. G and H, orthogonal views showing residues in K96Q whose NMR signals become broadened (green) or show strong CSPs (gold) upon actin binding. These are mainly located in 4 and 5 in the region centered around Tyr117. The second orientation shows that the actin binding site is asymmetric over the top half of the molecule.
 
  The above figures are reprinted by permission from the ASBMB: J Biol Chem (2004, 279, 4840-4848) copyright 2004.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
21411219 A.Muhlrad, E.E.Grintsevich, and E.Reisler (2011).
Polycation induced actin bundles.
  Biophys Chem, 155, 45-51.  
20133134 B.W.Bernstein, and J.R.Bamburg (2010).
ADF/cofilin: a functional node in cell biology.
  Trends Cell Biol, 20, 187-195.  
19009559 C.Thouverey, A.Strzelecka-Kiliszek, M.Balcerzak, R.Buchet, and S.Pikula (2009).
Matrix vesicles originate from apical membrane microvilli of mineralizing osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells.
  J Cell Biochem, 106, 127-138.  
19885333 H.W.Nam (2009).
GRA Proteins of Toxoplasma gondii: Maintenance of Host-Parasite Interactions across the Parasitophorous Vacuolar Membrane.
  Korean J Parasitol, 47, S29-S37.  
19459188 K.Ono, and S.Ono (2009).
Actin-ADF/cofilin rod formation in Caenorhabditis elegans muscle requires a putative F-actin binding site of ADF/cofilin at the C-terminus.
  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 66, 398-408.  
19752190 V.Papalouka, D.A.Arvanitis, E.Vafiadaki, M.Mavroidis, S.A.Papadodima, C.A.Spiliopoulou, D.T.Kremastinos, E.G.Kranias, and D.Sanoudou (2009).
Muscle LIM protein interacts with cofilin 2 and regulates F-actin dynamics in cardiac and skeletal muscle.
  Mol Cell Biol, 29, 6046-6058.  
19029335 C.Frantz, G.Barreiro, L.Dominguez, X.Chen, R.Eddy, J.Condeelis, M.J.Kelly, M.P.Jacobson, and D.L.Barber (2008).
Cofilin is a pH sensor for actin free barbed end formation: role of phosphoinositide binding.
  J Cell Biol, 183, 865-879.  
18258262 E.E.Grintsevich, S.A.Benchaar, D.Warshaviak, P.Boontheung, F.Halgand, J.P.Whitelegge, K.F.Faull, R.R.Loo, D.Sept, J.A.Loo, and E.Reisler (2008).
Mapping the cofilin binding site on yeast G-actin by chemical cross-linking.
  J Mol Biol, 377, 395-409.  
18042684 J.K.Kamal, and M.R.Chance (2008).
Modeling of protein binary complexes using structural mass spectrometry data.
  Protein Sci, 17, 79-94.  
18780792 J.Srivastava, G.Barreiro, S.Groscurth, A.R.Gingras, B.T.Goult, D.R.Critchley, M.J.Kelly, M.P.Jacobson, and D.L.Barber (2008).
Structural model and functional significance of pH-dependent talin-actin binding for focal adhesion remodeling.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105, 14436-14441.  
17470807 J.K.Kamal, S.A.Benchaar, K.Takamoto, E.Reisler, and M.R.Chance (2007).
Three-dimensional structure of cofilin bound to monomeric actin derived by structural mass spectrometry data.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 7910-7915.  
18058037 S.C.Almo, J.B.Bonanno, J.M.Sauder, S.Emtage, T.P.Dilorenzo, V.Malashkevich, S.R.Wasserman, S.Swaminathan, S.Eswaramoorthy, R.Agarwal, D.Kumaran, M.Madegowda, S.Ragumani, Y.Patskovsky, J.Alvarado, U.A.Ramagopal, J.Faber-Barata, M.R.Chance, A.Sali, A.Fiser, Z.Y.Zhang, D.S.Lawrence, and S.K.Burley (2007).
Structural genomics of protein phosphatases.
  J Struct Funct Genomics, 8, 121-140.
PDB codes: 1rxd 2fh7 2g59 2hcm 2hhl 2hxp 2hy3 2i0o 2i1y 2i44 2iq1 2irm 2isn 2nv5 2oyc 2p27 2p4u 2p69 2p8e 2pbn 2q5e 2qjc 2r0b
17427953 S.K.Jung, D.G.Jeong, T.S.Yoon, J.H.Kim, S.E.Ryu, and S.J.Kim (2007).
Crystal structure of human slingshot phosphatase 2.
  Proteins, 68, 408-412.
PDB code: 2nt2
17522712 W.Wang, R.Eddy, and J.Condeelis (2007).
The cofilin pathway in breast cancer invasion and metastasis.
  Nat Rev Cancer, 7, 429-440.  
16847879 D.Pavlov, A.Muhlrad, J.Cooper, M.Wear, and E.Reisler (2006).
Severing of F-actin by yeast cofilin is pH-independent.
  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 63, 533-542.  
17170572 H.J.Ahn, S.Kim, H.E.Kim, and H.W.Nam (2006).
Interactions between secreted GRA proteins and host cell proteins across the paratitophorous vacuolar membrane in the parasitism of Toxoplasma gondii.
  Korean J Parasitol, 44, 303-312.  
17114056 V.Y.Gorbatyuk, N.J.Nosworthy, S.A.Robson, N.P.Bains, M.W.Maciejewski, C.G.Dos Remedios, and G.F.King (2006).
Mapping the phosphoinositide-binding site on chick cofilin explains how PIP2 regulates the cofilin-actin interaction.
  Mol Cell, 24, 511-522.  
15975905 H.Schüler, A.K.Mueller, and K.Matuschewski (2005).
A Plasmodium actin-depolymerizing factor that binds exclusively to actin monomers.
  Mol Biol Cell, 16, 4013-4023.  
15872087 O.Quintero-Monzon, A.A.Rodal, B.Strokopytov, S.C.Almo, and B.L.Goode (2005).
Structural and functional dissection of the Abp1 ADFH actin-binding domain reveals versatile in vivo adapter functions.
  Mol Biol Cell, 16, 3128-3139.  
15083531 B.W.Bernstein, and J.R.Bamburg (2004).
A proposed mechanism for cell polarization with no external cues.
  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 58, 96.  
15246432 V.O.Paavilainen, E.Bertling, S.Falck, and P.Lappalainen (2004).
Regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics by actin-monomer-binding proteins.
  Trends Cell Biol, 14, 386-394.  
15459340 X.Li, X.Liu, Z.Lou, X.Duan, H.Wu, Y.Liu, and Z.Rao (2004).
Crystal structure of human coactosin-like protein at 1.9 A resolution.
  Protein Sci, 13, 2845-2851.
PDB code: 1vfq
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.