 |
PDBsum entry 1prv
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1prv
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
DNA binding protein
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Purine repressor DNA-binding domain DNA binding
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Purine repressor. Chain: a. Fragment: DNA-binding. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21. Expression_system_taxid: 511693.
|
|
NMR struc:
|
 |
20 models
|
 |
|
Authors:
|
 |
A.Nagadoi,S.Morikawa,H.Nakamura,M.Enari,K.Kobayashi,H.Yamamoto, G.Sampei,K.Mizobuchi,M.A.Schumacher,R.G.Brennan,Y.Nishimura
|
Key ref:
|
 |
A.Nagadoi
et al.
(1995).
Structural comparison of the free and DNA-bound forms of the purine repressor DNA-binding domain.
Structure,
3,
1217-1224.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
08-May-95
|
Release date:
|
08-Mar-96
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P0ACP7
(PURR_ECOLI) -
HTH-type transcriptional repressor PurR from Escherichia coli (strain K12)
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
341 a.a.
56 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
3:1217-1224
(1995)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural comparison of the free and DNA-bound forms of the purine repressor DNA-binding domain.
|
|
A.Nagadoi,
S.Morikawa,
H.Nakamura,
M.Enari,
K.Kobayashi,
H.Yamamoto,
G.Sampei,
K.Mizobuchi,
M.A.Schumacher,
R.G.Brennan.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
BACKGROUND: The purine repressor (PurR) regulates genes that encode enzymes for
purine biosynthesis. PurR has a two domain structure with an N-terminal
DNA-binding domain (DBD) and a C-terminal corepressor-binding domain (CBD). The
three dimensional structure of a ternary complex of PurR bound to both
corepressor and a specific DNA sequence has recently been determined by X-ray
crystallography. RESULTS: We have determined the solution structure of the PurR
DBD by NMR. It contains three helices, with the first and second helices forming
a helix-turn-helix motif. The tertiary structure of the three helices is very
similar to that of the corresponding region in the ternary complex. The
structure of the hinge helical region, however, which makes specific base
contacts in the minor groove of DNA, is disordered in the DNA-free form.
CONCLUSION: The stable formation of PurR hinge helices requires PurR
dimerization, which brings the hinge regions proximal to each other. The
dimerization of the hinge helices is likely to be controlled by the CBD
dimerization interface, but is induced by specific-DNA binding.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Stereoview of the best-fit superpositions of the 20
PurN56 structures, along with the refined average structure.
Met1–Pro47 is shown in yellow for the 20 structures and in red
for the average structure, and Ser48–Val56 is green for the
20 structures. No average structure is shown for the C-terminal
residues. Figure 3. Stereoview of the best-fit
superpositions of the 20 PurN56 structures, along with the
refined average structure. Met1–Pro47 is shown in yellow for
the 20 structures and in red for the average structure, and
Ser48–Val56 is green for the 20 structures. No average
structure is shown for the C-terminal residues.
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. A best-fit superposition of the free PurR DBD
structure onto the ternary complex structure of the
PurR–hypoxanthine–purF-operator. The backbone atoms of the
free PurR DBD (Met1–Ser48) are shown in yellow, and the
backbone atoms of PurR dimer in the ternary complex are shown in
blue and red, the two colours distinguishing the two monomers.
The DNA atoms are shown in pink and white. Two hypoxanthine
molecules bound to PurR dimer are also shown in white. Figure
7. A best-fit superposition of the free PurR DBD structure onto
the ternary complex structure of the
PurR–hypoxanthine–purF-operator. The backbone atoms of the
free PurR DBD (Met1–Ser48) are shown in yellow, and the
backbone atoms of PurR dimer in the ternary complex are shown in
blue and red, the two colours distinguishing the two monomers.
The DNA atoms are shown in pink and white. Two hypoxanthine
molecules bound to PurR dimer are also shown in white.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(1995,
3,
1217-1224)
copyright 1995.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
E.H.Bromley,
N.J.Kuwada,
M.J.Zuckermann,
R.Donadini,
L.Samii,
G.A.Blab,
G.J.Gemmen,
B.J.Lopez,
P.M.Curmi,
N.R.Forde,
D.N.Woolfson,
and
H.Linke
(2009).
The Tumbleweed: towards a synthetic proteinmotor.
|
| |
HFSP J,
3,
204-212.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Shen,
A.Liwo,
and
H.A.Scheraga
(2009).
An improved functional form for the temperature scaling factors of the components of the mesoscopic UNRES force field for simulations of protein structure and dynamics.
|
| |
J Phys Chem B,
113,
8738-8744.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Swint-Kruse,
and
K.S.Matthews
(2009).
Allostery in the LacI/GalR family: variations on a theme.
|
| |
Curr Opin Microbiol,
12,
129-137.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.K.Singh,
G.J.Palm,
S.Panjikar,
and
W.Hinrichs
(2007).
Structure of the apo form of the catabolite control protein A (CcpA) from Bacillus megaterium with a DNA-binding domain.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
63,
253-257.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Tungtur,
S.M.Egan,
and
L.Swint-Kruse
(2007).
Functional consequences of exchanging domains between LacI and PurR are mediated by the intervening linker sequence.
|
| |
Proteins,
68,
375-388.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.S.Franco,
L.J.Mota,
C.M.Soares,
and
I.de Sá-Nogueira
(2006).
Functional domains of the Bacillus subtilis transcription factor AraR and identification of amino acids important for nucleoprotein complex assembly and effector binding.
|
| |
J Bacteriol,
188,
3024-3036.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Swint-Kruse,
C.Larson,
B.M.Pettitt,
and
K.S.Matthews
(2002).
Fine-tuning function: correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
11,
778-794.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Spronk,
A.M.Bonvin,
P.K.Radha,
G.Melacini,
R.Boelens,
and
R.Kaptein
(1999).
The solution structure of Lac repressor headpiece 62 complexed to a symmetrical lac operator.
|
| |
Structure,
7,
1483-1492.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.M.Falcon,
and
K.S.Matthews
(1999).
Glycine insertion in the hinge region of lactose repressor protein alters DNA binding.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
274,
30849-30857.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.E.Zheleznova,
P.N.Markham,
A.A.Neyfakh,
and
R.G.Brennan
(1999).
Structural basis of multidrug recognition by BmrR, a transcription activator of a multidrug transporter.
|
| |
Cell,
96,
353-362.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.I.Jørgensen,
B.H.Kallipolitis,
and
P.Valentin-Hansen
(1998).
DNA-binding characteristics of the Escherichia coli CytR regulator: a relaxed spacing requirement between operator half-sites is provided by a flexible, unstructured interdomain linker.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
27,
41-50.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.N.Arvidson,
F.Lu,
C.Faber,
H.Zalkin,
and
R.G.Brennan
(1998).
The structure of PurR mutant L54M shows an alternative route to DNA kinking.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol,
5,
436-441.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Xu,
M.Moraitis,
R.J.Reedstrom,
and
K.S.Matthews
(1998).
Kinetic and thermodynamic studies of purine repressor binding to corepressor and operator DNA.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
273,
8958-8964.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Swint-Kruse,
K.S.Matthews,
P.E.Smith,
and
B.M.Pettitt
(1998).
Comparison of simulated and experimentally determined dynamics for a variant of the Lacl DNA-binding domain, Nlac-P.
|
| |
Biophys J,
74,
413-421.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.H.Kallipolitis,
M.Nørregaard-Madsen,
and
P.Valentin-Hansen
(1997).
Protein-protein communication: structural model of the repression complex formed by CytR and the global regulator CRP.
|
| |
Cell,
89,
1101-1109.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Pedersen,
and
P.Valentin-Hansen
(1997).
Protein-induced fit: the CRP activator protein changes sequence-specific DNA recognition by the CytR repressor, a highly flexible LacI member.
|
| |
EMBO J,
16,
2108-2118.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Kercher,
P.Lu,
and
M.Lewis
(1997).
Lac repressor-operator complex.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
7,
76-85.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Schumacher,
A.Glasfeld,
H.Zalkin,
and
R.G.Brennan
(1997).
The X-ray structure of the PurR-guanine-purF operator complex reveals the contributions of complementary electrostatic surfaces and a water-mediated hydrogen bond to corepressor specificity and binding affinity.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
272,
22648-22653.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Schumacher,
K.Y.Choi,
F.Lu,
H.Zalkin,
and
R.G.Brennan
(1995).
Mechanism of corepressor-mediated specific DNA binding by the purine repressor.
|
| |
Cell,
83,
147-155.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |