 |
PDBsum entry 1peb
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sugar binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1peb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
278:34555-34567
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Insights into the conformational equilibria of maltose-binding protein by analysis of high affinity mutants.
|
|
P.G.Telmer,
B.H.Shilton.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The affinity of maltose-binding protein (MBP) for maltose and related
carbohydrates was greatly increased by removal of groups in the interface
opposite the ligand binding cleft. The wild-type protein has a KD of 1200 nM for
maltose; mutation of residues Met-321 and Gln-325, both to alanine, resulted in
a KD for maltose of 70 nM; deletion of 4 residues, Glu-172, Asn-173, Lys-175,
and Tyr-176, which are part of a poorly ordered loop, results in a KD for
maltose of 110 nM. Combining the mutations yields an increased affinity for
maltodextrins and a KD of 6 nM for maltotriose. Comparison of ligand binding by
the mutants, using surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, indicates that
decreases in the off-rate are responsible for the increased affinity.
Small-angle x-ray scattering was used to demonstrate that the mutations do not
significantly affect the solution conformation of MBP in either the presence or
absence of maltose. The crystal structures of selected mutants showed that the
mutations do not cause significant structural changes in either the closed or
open conformation of MBP. These studies show that interactions in the interface
opposite the ligand binding cleft, which we term the "balancing
interface," are responsible for modulating the affinity of MBP for its
ligand. Our results are consistent with a model in which the ligand-bound
protein alternates between the closed and open conformations, and removal of
interactions in the balancing interface decreases the stability of the open
conformation, without affecting the closed conformation.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 9.
FIG. 9. Structural analysis of the open and closed
conformations. For panels A and B, open, unliganded structures
of MBP are illustrated on the left, whereas liganded and closed
structures of MBP are illustrated on the right. Panel A shows
the backbone structures of MBP-WT (9, 10), with residues 171 to
178 highlighted in black. Panel B shows the backbone structures
of MBP-Del, in exactly the same orientation as the wild-type
protein. Note that for MBP-Del, the truncated loop cannot make
contact with the N-terminal domain in either the open or closed
conformations. Panel C illustrates the cavity formed in the
balancing interface of the open conformation when Met-321 and
Gln-325 are mutated to alanine. Here, the molecular surface of
open, unliganded MBP-DM is shown, with the side chains of
Met-321 and Gln-325 from the structure of open, unliganded
MBP-Del. The figures in panels A and B were made with
SwissPDBViewer (39), whereas the figure in panel C was made with
SPOCK (40) and Raster3D (41).
|
 |
Figure 10.
FIG. 10. Mechanism of maltose binding by MBP. MBP is
illustrated in the two conformations, closed and open, that have
been crystallized (9, 10). The circular "bite" taken out of the
balancing interface represents the removal of interactions in
MBP-DM. A comprehensive equilibrium that includes an open,
liganded conformation as well as a closed unliganded
conformation provides a mechanism for the increased affinity and
decreased k[OFF] observed for the balancing interface mutants
(see "Discussion"). Unliganded MBP exists in equilibrium between
the closed and open conformations, and the equilibrium is
shifted toward the closed, liganded conformation in the presence
of maltose. In the closed conformation, the ligand binding site
is not accessible, and therefore maltose can only exchange with
the open conformation. On this basis, the bimolecular rate
constant, k[ON], comprises at least two steps: the binding of
maltose, and the conformational change from open to closed.
Similarly, the rate constant for dissociation of the complex,
k[OFF], includes rates for opening of MBP (k[-][3]) and ligand
dissociation (k[-][2]).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2003,
278,
34555-34567)
copyright 2003.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
In this protein engineering experiment, the affinity of maltose binding protein for its ligands was increased approximately 100-fold by disrupting interactions in the "balancing interface", which altered the conformational equiilbria of the protein.
Brian Shilton
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
I.H.Walker,
P.C.Hsieh,
and
P.D.Riggs
(2010).
Mutations in maltose-binding protein that alter affinity and solubility properties.
|
| |
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol,
88,
187-197.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.D.Gould,
P.G.Telmer,
and
B.H.Shilton
(2009).
Stimulation of the maltose transporter ATPase by unliganded maltose binding protein.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
48,
8051-8061.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.S.Souza,
L.C.Ferreira,
L.Thomas,
J.A.Barbosa,
and
A.Balan
(2009).
Crystallization, data collection and data processing of maltose-binding protein (MalE) from the phytopathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
65,
105-107.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.R.Na,
and
C.Park
(2009).
Investigating protein unfolding kinetics by pulse proteolysis.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
18,
268-276.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Davidson,
E.Dassa,
C.Orelle,
and
J.Chen
(2008).
Structure, function, and evolution of bacterial ATP-binding cassette systems.
|
| |
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev,
72,
317.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.Borrok,
L.L.Kiessling,
and
K.T.Forest
(2007).
Conformational changes of glucose/galactose-binding protein illuminated by open, unliganded, and ultra-high-resolution ligand-bound structures.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
16,
1032-1041.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Park,
and
S.Marqusee
(2005).
Pulse proteolysis: a simple method for quantitative determination of protein stability and ligand binding.
|
| |
Nat Methods,
2,
207-212.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.L.Rich,
and
D.G.Myszka
(2005).
Survey of the year 2003 commercial optical biosensor literature.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit,
18,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Mathonet,
and
J.Fastrez
(2004).
Engineering of non-natural receptors.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
14,
505-511.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Fischetti,
S.Stepanov,
G.Rosenbaum,
R.Barrea,
E.Black,
D.Gore,
R.Heurich,
E.Kondrashkina,
A.J.Kropf,
S.Wang,
K.Zhang,
T.C.Irving,
and
G.B.Bunker
(2004).
The BioCAT undulator beamline 18ID: a facility for biological non-crystalline diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy at the Advanced Photon Source.
|
| |
J Synchrotron Radiat,
11,
399-405.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |