 |
PDBsum entry 1p2c
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immune system/hydrolase
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1p2c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Immune system/hydrolase
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure analysis of an anti-lysozyme antibody
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Light chain anti-lysozyme antibody f10.6.6. Chain: a, d. Heavy chain vh+ch1 anti-lysozyme antibody f10.6.6. Chain: b, e. LysozymE C. Chain: c, f. Synonym: 1,4-beta-n-acetylmuramidasE C, allergen gal d 4, gal d iv. Ec: 3.2.1.17
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Mus musculus. House mouse. Organism_taxid: 10090. Strain: balb-c. Gallus gallus. Chicken. Organism_taxid: 9031
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Trimer (from
)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.00Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.204
|
R-free:
|
0.242
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
A.Cauerhff,F.A.Goldbaum,B.C.Braden
|
Key ref:
|
 |
A.Cauerhff
et al.
(2004).
Structural mechanism for affinity maturation of an anti-lysozyme antibody.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
101,
3539-3544.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
15-Apr-03
|
Release date:
|
17-Feb-04
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P01837
(IGKC_MOUSE) -
Immunoglobulin kappa constant from Mus musculus
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
107 a.a.
212 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
Chains C, F:
E.C.3.2.1.17
- lysozyme.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
Hydrolysis of the 1,4-beta-linkages between N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid in peptidoglycan heteropolymers of the prokaryotes cell walls.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
101:3539-3544
(2004)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural mechanism for affinity maturation of an anti-lysozyme antibody.
|
|
A.Cauerhff,
F.A.Goldbaum,
B.C.Braden.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
In the immune response against a typical T cell-dependent protein antigen, the
affinity maturation process is fast and is associated with the early class
switch from IgM to IgG. As such, a comprehension of the molecular basis of
affinity maturation could be of great importance in biomedical and
biotechnological applications. Affinity maturation of anti-protein antibodies
has been reported to be the result of small structural changes, mostly confined
to the periphery of the antigen-combining site. However, little is understood
about how these small structural changes account for the increase in the
affinity toward the antigen. Herein, we present the three-dimensional structure
of the Fab fragment from BALB/c mouse mAb F10.6.6 in complex with the antigen
lysozyme. This antibody was obtained from a long-term exposure to the antigen.
mAb F10.6.6, and the previously described antibody D44.1, are the result of
identical or nearly identical somatic recombination events. However, different
mutations in the framework and variable regions result in an approximately 10(3)
higher affinity for the F10.6.6 antibody. The comparison of the
three-dimensional structures of these Fab-lysozyme complexes reveals that the
affinity maturation produces a fine tuning of the complementarity of the
antigen-combining site toward the epitope, explaining at the molecular level how
the immune system is able to increase the affinity of an anti-protein antibody
to subnanomolar levels.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. Superposition of F10.6.6-HEL (yellow) and D44.1-HEL
(light blue). For clarity, the F[V]-HEL of only one F10.6.6-HEL
and one D44.1-HEL is shown. The superposition identifies no
remarkable conformational differences between F10.6.6 and D44.1;
however, the HEL in the D44.1 complex shows a displacement away
from the antibody, as compared with the F10.6.6-HEL structure.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Stereoview of the CDR L3/HEL interaction in
F10.6.6/HEL (yellow) and D44.1/HEL (light blue) complexes. The
dislocation of the HEL carbonyl by D44.1 CDRL3 Asn is evident.
The average displacement of the HEL C s in the D44.1-HEL
structures is 0.45 Å.
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
P.L.Kastritis,
I.H.Moal,
H.Hwang,
Z.Weng,
P.A.Bates,
A.M.Bonvin,
and
J.Janin
(2011).
A structure-based benchmark for protein-protein binding affinity.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
20,
482-491.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Barderas,
J.Desmet,
P.Timmerman,
R.Meloen,
and
J.I.Casal
(2008).
Affinity maturation of antibodies assisted by in silico modeling.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
9029-9034.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Moza,
A.K.Varma,
R.A.Buonpane,
P.Zhu,
C.A.Herfst,
M.J.Nicholson,
A.K.Wilbuer,
N.P.Seth,
K.W.Wucherpfennig,
J.K.McCormick,
D.M.Kranz,
and
E.J.Sundberg
(2007).
Structural basis of T-cell specificity and activation by the bacterial superantigen TSST-1.
|
| |
EMBO J,
26,
1187-1197.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.De Genst,
K.Silence,
K.Decanniere,
K.Conrath,
R.Loris,
J.Kinne,
S.Muyldermans,
and
L.Wyns
(2006).
Molecular basis for the preferential cleft recognition by dromedary heavy-chain antibodies.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
4586-4591.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Dooley,
R.L.Stanfield,
R.A.Brady,
and
M.F.Flajnik
(2006).
First molecular and biochemical analysis of in vivo affinity maturation in an ectothermic vertebrate.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
1846-1851.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.L.Rich,
and
D.G.Myszka
(2005).
Survey of the year 2004 commercial optical biosensor literature.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit,
18,
431-478.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |
| |