 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Transferase
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
M64v pnp +talo
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Purine nucleoside phosphorylase. Chain: a, b, c. Synonym: inosine phosphorylase, pnp. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Gene: deod or pup or b4384 or z5986 or ecs5343. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Hexamer (from PDB file)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.40Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.228
|
R-free:
|
0.260
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
S.E.Ealick,E.M.Bennett,R.Anand,J.A.Secrist,W.B.Parker,A.E.Ha P.W.Allan,D.T.Mcpherson,E.J.Sorscher
|
Key ref:
|
 |
E.M.Bennett
et al.
(2003).
Designer gene therapy using an Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase/prodrug system.
Chem Biol,
10,
1173-1181.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
24-Mar-03
|
Release date:
|
17-Feb-04
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P0ABP8
(DEOD_ECOLI) -
Purine nucleoside phosphorylase deoD-type
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
239 a.a.
237 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 1 residue position (black
cross)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.2.4.2.1
- Purine-nucleoside phosphorylase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
Purine nucleoside + phosphate = purine + alpha-D-ribose 1-phosphate
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Purine nucleoside
Bound ligand (Het Group name = )
matches with 90.00% similarity
|
+
|
phosphate
Bound ligand (Het Group name = )
corresponds exactly
|
=
|
purine
|
+
|
alpha-D-ribose 1-phosphate
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Cellular component
|
membrane
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process
|
4 terms
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
catalytic activity
|
6 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Chem Biol
10:1173-1181
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Designer gene therapy using an Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase/prodrug system.
|
|
E.M.Bennett,
R.Anand,
P.W.Allan,
A.E.Hassan,
J.S.Hong,
D.N.Levasseur,
D.T.McPherson,
W.B.Parker,
J.A.Secrist,
E.J.Sorscher,
T.M.Townes,
W.R.Waud,
S.E.Ealick.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Activation of prodrugs by Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP)
provides a method for selectively killing tumor cells expressing a transfected
PNP gene. This gene therapy approach requires matching a prodrug and a known
enzymatic activity present only in tumor cells. The specificity of the method
relies on avoiding prodrug cleavage by enzymes already present in the host cells
or the intestinal flora. Using crystallographic and computer modeling methods as
guides, we have redesigned E. coli PNP to cleave new prodrug substrates more
efficiently than does the wild-type enzyme. In particular, the M64V PNP mutant
cleaves 9-(6-deoxy-alpha-L-talofuranosyl)-6-methylpurine with a kcat/Km over 100
times greater than for native E. coli PNP. In a xenograft tumor experiment, this
compound caused regression of tumors expressing the M64V PNP gene.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Nucleosides and Their Interaction with the PNP
Active Site(A) Active site structures for E. coli PNP and human
PNP. Each active site is composed of eight segments. For each
segment, the top line, in red, gives the human PNP residue
numbers. The bottom line, in green, gives the E. coli PNP
residue numbers. Segment eight in human PNP comes from an
adjacent monomer, and segments two and eight in E. coli PNP come
from an adjacent monomer (denoted by asterisks). The amino acid
residues are aligned based on the structures of the two
enzymes. The differences in active site residues result
in different substrate specificity, even though the overall
fold is the same.(B) Modified nucleosides used in this study. 1,
9-(2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranosyl)-6-methylpurine (MeP-dR); 2,
9-(6-deoxy-α-L-talofuranosyl)-6-methylpurine [Me(talo)-MeP-R];
3, 9-(6-deoxy-β-D-allofuranosyl)-6-methylpurine
[Me(allo)-MeP-R]; 4, 9-α-L-lyxofuranosyl-adenine (lyxo-Ado);
5, 9-(5′-5′-di-C-methyl-β-D-ribofuranosyl)-6-methylpurine
(5′,5′-dimethyl-MeP-R).
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Redesign of PNP to Accommodate a New Prodrug(A)
Modeling studies predicted a steric clash (shown in green)
between the 5′-methyl group of Me(talo)-MeP-R and the side
chain of Met64.(B) Stereodiagram of the MeP-dR/wild-type PNP
crystal structure (our unpublished data), with crystal structure
carbon atoms shown in green. Modeling an additional carbon atom
(shown in black) on C5′ results in unfavorable steric
interactions (purple dotted lines) with the Met64 side chain.(C)
The unfavorable interaction is eliminated in the M64V PNP.(D)
Crystal structure of Me(talo)-MeP-R with M64V PNP, with the
global minimum from computational docking overlayed in black
wire frame representation. Panels (B) and (D) were created with
Molscript [48] and Raster3D [49].
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Chem Biol
(2003,
10,
1173-1181)
copyright 2003.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.Hébrard,
C.Dumontet,
and
L.P.Jordheim
(2009).
Development of gene therapy in association with clinically used cytotoxic deoxynucleoside analogues.
|
| |
Cancer Gene Ther, 16,
541-550.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.S.Chen,
Y.Jounaidi,
T.Su,
and
D.J.Waxman
(2007).
Enhancement of intratumoral cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity in a P450 2B11-based cancer gene therapy model.
|
| |
Cancer Gene Ther, 14,
935-944.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Portsmouth,
J.Hlavaty,
and
M.Renner
(2007).
Suicide genes for cancer therapy.
|
| |
Mol Aspects Med, 28,
4.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.J.Sorscher,
J.Harris,
M.Alexander,
A.Rottgers,
K.Hardy,
S.Ponnazhagan,
J.F.Collawn,
J.McClintock,
C.D.Amsler,
A.Webster,
J.Maddry,
B.J.Baker,
and
J.S.Hong
(2006).
Activators of viral gene expression in polarized epithelial monolayers identified by rapid-throughput drug screening.
|
| |
Gene Ther, 13,
781-788.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.J.Russell,
and
A.Khatri
(2006).
Novel gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapies against prostate cancer.
|
| |
Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 15,
947-961.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.U.Dachs,
J.Tupper,
and
G.M.Tozer
(2005).
From bench to bedside for gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy of cancer.
|
| |
Anticancer Drugs, 16,
349-359.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Bu,
E.C.Settembre,
M.H.el Kouni,
and
S.E.Ealick
(2005).
Structural basis for inhibition of Escherichia coli uridine phosphorylase by 5-substituted acyclouridines.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 61,
863-872.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|