|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
279:1449-1457
(2004)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Molecular basis for synergistic transcriptional activation by Oct1 and Sox2 revealed from the solution structure of the 42-kDa Oct1.Sox2.Hoxb1-DNA ternary transcription factor complex.
|
|
D.C.Williams,
M.Cai,
G.M.Clore.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The Oct and Sox transcription factors control many different aspects of neural
development and embryogenesis, often binding to adjacent sites on DNA, and
interacting with one another through their DNA binding domains to regulate
transcription synergistically. Oct proteins contain two DNA binding domains
(POUS and POUHD) connected by a flexible linker, which interact with DNA in a
bipartite manner. Residual dipolar coupling measurements on the binary Oct1.DNA
complex reveal that the two domains are characterized by distinct alignment
tensors in both phage pf1 and polyethylene glycol/hexanol liquid crystalline
media. We show that this difference is due to a fast microscopic
dissociation/association process involving alternative binding modes for the
weaker binding POUS domain in the binary complex. Upon binding of Sox2 to an
adjacent site in the Hoxb1 regulatory element, all components of the ternary
Oct1.Sox2.DNA complex share a single alignment tensor. Thus ternary complex
formation increases the site-specific affinity of Oct1 for DNA by effectively
locking the POUS domain in a single orientation on the DNA. The solution NMR
structure of the ternary 42 kDa Oct1.Sox2.Hoxb1-DNA complex, determined by novel
procedures based on orientational restraints from dipolar couplings and
conjoined rigid body/torsion angle dynamics, reveals that Sox2 and POUS interact
through a predominantly hydrophobic interface, surrounded by a ring of
electrostatic interactions. These observations suggest a mechanism of
combinatorial control involving direct protein-protein interactions on the DNA
whereby Oct1 in conjunction with a co-interacting transcription factor provide
cell-specific transcription regulation.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
FIG. 3. Overview of the ternary
Oct1·Sox2·Hoxb1-DNA complex. A, ribbon diagram of
the ternary complex (Sox2, green; POU[S], red; POU[HD], gold;
and Hoxb1-DNA, blue). The side chain of Met-13 that intercalates
between base pairs 6 and 7 located at the center of the
Sox2-induced DNA bend is also shown. A dashed line represents
the disordered 32-residue linker that connects POU[S] and
POU[HD]. (This region is disordered in solution in both the
binary and ternary complexes, as well as in the binary crystal
structures, Refs. 7 and 26). B, diagrammatic representation of
POU[S]/Sox2 interface in the ternary complex formed by two
anti-parallel helices (Sox2, green and residues denoted in
italic type; POU[S], red). Solid and dashed lines indicate van
der Waals contacts and electrostatic interactions, respectively.
C, detailed view of the POU[S]/Sox2 interface. The side chain
atoms are color coded according to atom type (oxygen, red;
nitrogen, blue; carbon, cyan; sulfur, yellow). The backbone of
Sox2, POU[S], and Hoxb1-DNA are depicted as tubes in green, red,
and blue, respectively.
|
 |
Figure 4.
FIG. 4. Comparison of the relative orientations of POU[S]
and Sox2 in the ternary Oct1·Sox2·Hoxb1-DNA (left)
and Oct1·Sox2·FGF4-DNA (right) complexes. The
separation between the POU[S] and Sox2 binding sites is
increased by three base pairs (shown in magenta) in the FGF-4
element relative to the Hoxb1 element. This translates to a
difference of 108° in the relative orientations POU[S] and
Sox2 in the two ternary complexes. Sox2 is displayed in green,
Oct1 in red, and the DNA backbone in blue; the backbone of
residues at the POU[S]/Sox2 interface is highlighted in yellow.
The coordinates of the Oct1·Sox2·FGF4-DNA complex
are taken from Ref. 45 (PDB accession code 1GT0 [PDB]
).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2004,
279,
1449-1457)
copyright 2004.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
D.Esch,
J.Vahokoski,
M.R.Groves,
V.Pogenberg,
V.Cojocaru,
H.Vom Bruch,
D.Han,
H.C.Drexler,
M.J.Araúzo-Bravo,
C.K.Ng,
R.Jauch,
M.Wilmanns,
and
H.R.Schöler
(2013).
A unique Oct4 interface is crucial for reprogramming to pluripotency.
|
| |
Nat Cell Biol,
15,
295-301.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Rubio-Cosials,
J.F.Sidow,
N.Jiménez-Menéndez,
P.Fernández-Millán,
J.Montoya,
H.T.Jacobs,
M.Coll,
P.Bernadó,
and
M.Solà
(2011).
Human mitochondrial transcription factor A induces a U-turn structure in the light strand promoter.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
18,
1281-1289.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Fang,
J.G.Yoon,
L.Li,
W.Yu,
J.Shao,
D.Hua,
S.Zheng,
L.Hood,
D.R.Goodlett,
G.Foltz,
and
B.Lin
(2011).
The SOX2 response program in glioblastoma multiforme: an integrated ChIP-seq, expression microarray, and microRNA analysis.
|
| |
BMC Genomics,
12,
11.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.L.van den Berg,
T.Snoek,
N.P.Mullin,
A.Yates,
K.Bezstarosti,
J.Demmers,
I.Chambers,
and
R.A.Poot
(2010).
An Oct4-centered protein interaction network in embryonic stem cells.
|
| |
Cell Stem Cell,
6,
369-381.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Cai,
Y.Huang,
R.Craigie,
and
G.M.Clore
(2010).
Structural basis of the association of HIV-1 matrix protein with DNA.
|
| |
PLoS One,
5,
e15675.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Lian,
L.Angela Liu,
Y.Shi,
Y.Bu,
and
D.Wei
(2010).
Tethered-hopping model for protein-DNA binding and unbinding based on Sox2-Oct1-Hoxb1 ternary complex simulations.
|
| |
Biophys J,
98,
1285-1293.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Martin,
S.W.Lu,
H.van Tilbeurgh,
D.R.Ripoll,
C.Dixelius,
B.G.Turgeon,
and
R.Debuchy
(2010).
Tracing the origin of the fungal α1 domain places its ancestor in the HMG-box superfamily: implication for fungal mating-type evolution.
|
| |
PLoS One,
5,
e15199.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Q.Li
(2010).
Master stem cell transcription factors and signaling regulation.
|
| |
Cell Reprogram,
12,
3.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.S.Jung,
M.Cai,
and
G.M.Clore
(2010).
Solution structure of the IIAChitobiose-IIBChitobiose complex of the N,N'-diacetylchitobiose branch of the Escherichia coli phosphotransferase system.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
4173-4184.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Rizzino
(2009).
Sox2 and Oct-3/4: a versatile pair of master regulators that orchestrate the self-renewal and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells.
|
| |
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med,
1,
228-236.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.M.Clore,
and
J.Iwahara
(2009).
Theory, practice, and applications of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement for the characterization of transient low-population states of biological macromolecules and their complexes.
|
| |
Chem Rev,
109,
4108-4139.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Chambers,
and
S.R.Tomlinson
(2009).
The transcriptional foundation of pluripotency.
|
| |
Development,
136,
2311-2322.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Kaufman,
M.Heled,
J.Perk,
A.Razin,
and
R.Shemer
(2009).
Protein-binding elements establish in the oocyte the primary imprint of the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes domain.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
10242-10247.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.K.Ng,
P.Palasingam,
R.Venkatachalam,
N.Baburajendran,
J.Cheng,
R.Jauch,
and
P.R.Kolatkar
(2008).
Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the HMG domain of Sox17 in complex with DNA.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
64,
1184-1187.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Y.Suh,
M.Cai,
and
G.M.Clore
(2008).
Impact of phosphorylation on structure and thermodynamics of the interaction between the N-terminal domain of enzyme I and the histidine phosphocarrier protein of the bacterial phosphotransferase system.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
18980-18989.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Doucleff,
and
G.M.Clore
(2008).
Global jumping and domain-specific intersegment transfer between DNA cognate sites of the multidomain transcription factor Oct-1.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
13871-13876.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Lee,
B.Lee,
K.Joshi,
S.L.Pfaff,
J.W.Lee,
and
S.K.Lee
(2008).
A regulatory network to segregate the identity of neuronal subtypes.
|
| |
Dev Cell,
14,
877-889.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Zhang,
S.C.Glöckner,
M.Guo,
E.O.Machida,
D.H.Wang,
H.Easwaran,
L.Van Neste,
J.G.Herman,
K.E.Schuebel,
D.N.Watkins,
N.Ahuja,
and
S.B.Baylin
(2008).
Epigenetic inactivation of the canonical Wnt antagonist SRY-box containing gene 17 in colorectal cancer.
|
| |
Cancer Res,
68,
2764-2772.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.L.Chang,
H.K.Tsai,
C.Y.Kao,
Y.C.Chen,
Y.J.Hu,
and
J.M.Yang
(2008).
Evolutionary conservation of DNA-contact residues in DNA-binding domains.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics,
9,
S3.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Zhang,
and
M.W.Klymkowsky
(2007).
The Sox axis, Nodal signaling, and germ layer specification.
|
| |
Differentiation,
75,
536-545.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Y.Suh,
J.Iwahara,
and
G.M.Clore
(2007).
Intramolecular domain-domain association/dissociation and phosphoryl transfer in the mannitol transporter of Escherichia coli are not coupled.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
104,
3153-3158.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Tang,
and
G.M.Clore
(2006).
A simple and reliable approach to docking protein-protein complexes from very sparse NOE-derived intermolecular distance restraints.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
36,
37-44.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Bax,
and
A.Grishaev
(2005).
Weak alignment NMR: a hawk-eyed view of biomolecular structure.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
15,
563-570.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.M.Bonvin,
R.Boelens,
and
R.Kaptein
(2005).
NMR analysis of protein interactions.
|
| |
Curr Opin Chem Biol,
9,
501-508.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.C.Williams,
M.Cai,
J.Y.Suh,
A.Peterkofsky,
and
G.M.Clore
(2005).
Solution NMR structure of the 48-kDa IIAMannose-HPr complex of the Escherichia coli mannose phosphotransferase system.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
280,
20775-20784.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.L.Chew,
Y.H.Loh,
W.Zhang,
X.Chen,
W.L.Tam,
L.S.Yeap,
P.Li,
Y.S.Ang,
B.Lim,
P.Robson,
and
H.H.Ng
(2005).
Reciprocal transcriptional regulation of Pou5f1 and Sox2 via the Oct4/Sox2 complex in embryonic stem cells.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
25,
6031-6046.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Wegner
(2005).
Secrets to a healthy Sox life: lessons for melanocytes.
|
| |
Pigment Cell Res,
18,
74-85.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Tugarinov,
W.Y.Choy,
V.Y.Orekhov,
and
L.E.Kay
(2005).
Solution NMR-derived global fold of a monomeric 82-kDa enzyme.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
102,
622-627.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Reményi,
H.R.Schöler,
and
M.Wilmanns
(2004).
Combinatorial control of gene expression.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
11,
812-815.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Chambers
(2004).
The molecular basis of pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells.
|
| |
Cloning Stem Cells,
6,
386-391.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Tanaka,
Y.Kamachi,
A.Tanouchi,
H.Hamada,
N.Jing,
and
H.Kondoh
(2004).
Interplay of SOX and POU factors in regulation of the Nestin gene in neural primordial cells.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
24,
8834-8846.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |