|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Cortajarena,
and
L.Regan
(2011).
Calorimetric study of a series of designed repeat proteins: Modular structure and modular folding.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 20,
336-340.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Baabur-Cohen,
S.Dayalan,
I.Shumacher,
R.Cohen-Luria,
and
G.Ashkenasy
(2011).
Artificial leucine rich repeats as new scaffolds for protein design.
|
| |
Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 21,
2372-2375.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Aksel,
A.Majumdar,
and
D.Barrick
(2011).
The contribution of entropy, enthalpy, and hydrophobic desolvation to cooperativity in repeat-protein folding.
|
| |
Structure, 19,
349-360.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Parashar,
N.Mirouze,
D.A.Dubnau,
and
M.B.Neiditch
(2011).
Structural basis of response regulator dephosphorylation by rap phosphatases.
|
| |
PLoS Biol, 9,
e1000589.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Cortajarena,
J.Wang,
and
L.Regan
(2010).
Crystal structure of a designed tetratricopeptide repeat module in complex with its peptide ligand.
|
| |
FEBS J, 277,
1058-1066.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Sircar,
S.Chaudhury,
K.P.Kilambi,
M.Berrondo,
and
J.J.Gray
(2010).
A generalized approach to sampling backbone conformations with RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 13-19.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
3115-3123.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Vural,
S.Oner,
N.An,
V.Simon,
D.Ma,
J.B.Blumer,
and
S.M.Lanier
(2010).
Distribution of activator of G-protein signaling 3 within the aggresomal pathway: role of specific residues in the tetratricopeptide repeat domain and differential regulation by the AGS3 binding partners Gi(alpha) and mammalian inscuteable.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol, 30,
1528-1540.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Janin
(2010).
The targets of CAPRI Rounds 13-19.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
3067-3072.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Eisenstein,
A.Ben-Shimon,
Z.Frankenstein,
and
N.Kowalsman
(2010).
CAPRI targets T29-T42: proving ground for new docking procedures.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
3174-3181.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Danot
(2010).
The inducer maltotriose binds in the central cavity of the tetratricopeptide-like sensor domain of MalT, a bacterial STAND transcription factor.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol, 77,
628-641.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.D'Arcy,
O.R.Davies,
T.L.Blundell,
and
V.M.Bolanos-Garcia
(2010).
Defining the molecular basis of BubR1 kinetochore interactions and APC/C-CDC20 inhibition.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 285,
14764-14776.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Eisenbeis,
and
B.Höcker
(2010).
Evolutionary mechanism as a template for protein engineering.
|
| |
J Pept Sci, 16,
538-544.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Fiorucci,
and
M.Zacharias
(2010).
Binding site prediction and improved scoring during flexible protein-protein docking with ATTRACT.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
3131-3139.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.de Vries,
A.S.Melquiond,
P.L.Kastritis,
E.Karaca,
A.Bordogna,
M.van Dijk,
J.P.Rodrigues,
and
A.M.Bonvin
(2010).
Strengths and weaknesses of data-driven docking in critical assessment of prediction of interactions.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
3242-3249.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Qin,
and
H.X.Zhou
(2010).
Selection of near-native poses in CAPRI rounds 13-19.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
3166-3173.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Y.Huang,
and
X.Zou
(2010).
MDockPP: A hierarchical approach for protein-protein docking and its application to CAPRI rounds 15-19.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
3096-3103.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Negron,
C.Fufezan,
and
R.L.Koder
(2009).
Geometric constraints for porphyrin binding in helical protein binding sites.
|
| |
Proteins, 74,
400-416.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.A.Champion,
L.Kundrat,
L.Regan,
and
S.J.Baserga
(2009).
A structural model for the HAT domain of Utp6 incorporating bioinformatics and genetics.
|
| |
Protein Eng Des Sel, 22,
431-439.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.D.McLachlan,
J.Slocik,
R.Mantz,
D.Kaplan,
S.Cahill,
M.Girvin,
and
S.Greenbaum
(2009).
High-resolution NMR characterization of a spider-silk mimetic composed of 15 tandem repeats and a CRGD motif.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 18,
206-216.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Hernández Torres,
N.Papandreou,
and
J.Chomilier
(2009).
Sequence analyses reveal that a TPR-DP module, surrounded by recombinable flanking introns, could be at the origin of eukaryotic Hop and Hip TPR-DP domains and prokaryotic GerD proteins.
|
| |
Cell Stress Chaperones, 14,
281-289.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.E.Matyskiela,
and
D.O.Morgan
(2009).
Analysis of activator-binding sites on the APC/C supports a cooperative substrate-binding mechanism.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 34,
68-80.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Mirus,
T.Bionda,
A.von Haeseler,
and
E.Schleiff
(2009).
Evolutionarily evolved discriminators in the 3-TPR domain of the Toc64 family involved in protein translocation at the outer membrane of chloroplasts and mitochondria.
|
| |
J Mol Model, 15,
971-982.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Aksel,
and
D.Barrick
(2009).
Analysis of repeat-protein folding using nearest-neighbor statistical mechanical models.
|
| |
Methods Enzymol, 455,
95.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.M.Bolanos-Garcia,
T.Kiyomitsu,
S.D'Arcy,
D.Y.Chirgadze,
J.G.Grossmann,
D.Matak-Vinkovic,
A.R.Venkitaraman,
M.Yanagida,
C.V.Robinson,
and
T.L.Blundell
(2009).
The crystal structure of the N-terminal region of BUB1 provides insight into the mechanism of BUB1 recruitment to kinetochores.
|
| |
Structure, 17,
105-116.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Javadi,
and
E.R.Main
(2009).
Exploring the folding energy landscape of a series of designed consensus tetratricopeptide repeat proteins.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106,
17383-17388.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Cortajarena,
G.Lois,
E.Sherman,
C.S.O'Hern,
L.Regan,
and
G.Haran
(2008).
Non-random-coil behavior as a consequence of extensive PPII structure in the denatured state.
|
| |
J Mol Biol, 382,
203-212.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Han,
K.Kim,
J.Oh,
J.Park,
and
Y.Kim
(2008).
TPR domain of NrfG mediates complex formation between heme lyase and formate-dependent nitrite reductase in Escherichia coli O157:H7.
|
| |
Proteins, 70,
900-914.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.U.Ferreiro,
A.M.Walczak,
E.A.Komives,
and
P.G.Wolynes
(2008).
The energy landscapes of repeat-containing proteins: topology, cooperativity, and the folding funnels of one-dimensional architectures.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol, 4,
e1000070.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.A.Champion,
B.H.Lane,
M.E.Jackrel,
L.Regan,
and
S.J.Baserga
(2008).
A direct interaction between the Utp6 half-a-tetratricopeptide repeat domain and a specific peptide in Utp21 is essential for efficient pre-rRNA processing.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol, 28,
6547-6556.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Kloss,
N.Courtemanche,
and
D.Barrick
(2008).
Repeat-protein folding: new insights into origins of cooperativity, stability, and topology.
|
| |
Arch Biochem Biophys, 469,
83-99.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Koo,
S.Tammam,
S.Y.Ku,
L.M.Sampaleanu,
L.L.Burrows,
and
P.L.Howell
(2008).
PilF is an outer membrane lipoprotein required for multimerization and localization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type IV pilus secretin.
|
| |
J Bacteriol, 190,
6961-6969.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.W.Hammond,
K.Griffin,
G.T.Jih,
J.Stuckey,
and
K.J.Verhey
(2008).
Co-operative versus independent transport of different cargoes by Kinesin-1.
|
| |
Traffic, 9,
725-741.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Palaiomylitou,
A.Tartas,
D.Vlachakis,
D.Tzamarias,
and
M.Vlassi
(2008).
Investigating the structural stability of the Tup1-interaction domain of Ssn6: evidence for a conformational change on the complex.
|
| |
Proteins, 70,
72-82.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.D.Werbeck,
P.J.Rowling,
V.R.Chellamuthu,
and
L.S.Itzhaki
(2008).
Shifting transition states in the unfolding of a large ankyrin repeat protein.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105,
9982-9987.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.M.Delahay,
G.D.Balkwill,
K.A.Bunting,
W.Edwards,
J.C.Atherton,
and
M.S.Searle
(2008).
The highly repetitive region of the Helicobacter pylori CagY protein comprises tandem arrays of an alpha-helical repeat module.
|
| |
J Mol Biol, 377,
956-971.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.A.Jarymowycz,
A.L.Cortajarena,
L.Regan,
and
M.J.Stone
(2008).
Comparison of the backbone dynamics of a natural and a consensus designed 3-TPR domain.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR, 41,
169-178.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Faudry,
V.Job,
A.Dessen,
I.Attree,
and
V.Forge
(2007).
Type III secretion system translocator has a molten globule conformation both in its free and chaperone-bound forms.
|
| |
FEBS J, 274,
3601-3610.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.W.Tripp,
and
D.Barrick
(2007).
Enhancing the stability and folding rate of a repeat protein through the addition of consensus repeats.
|
| |
J Mol Biol, 365,
1187-1200.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Kajander,
A.L.Cortajarena,
S.Mochrie,
and
L.Regan
(2007).
Structure and stability of designed TPR protein superhelices: unusual crystal packing and implications for natural TPR proteins.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 63,
800-811.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.C.Hausrath,
and
A.Goriely
(2006).
Repeat protein architectures predicted by a continuum representation of fold space.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 15,
753-760.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Perry,
J.M.Hulett,
V.A.Likić,
T.Lithgow,
and
P.R.Gooley
(2006).
Convergent evolution of receptors for protein import into mitochondria.
|
| |
Curr Biol, 16,
221-229.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Cortajarena,
and
L.Regan
(2006).
Ligand binding by TPR domains.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 15,
1193-1198.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Schapire,
V.Valpuesta,
and
M.A.Botella
(2006).
TPR Proteins in Plant Hormone Signaling.
|
| |
Plant Signal Behav, 1,
229-230.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.K.Binz,
A.Kohl,
A.Plückthun,
and
M.G.Grütter
(2006).
Crystal structure of a consensus-designed ankyrin repeat protein: implications for stability.
|
| |
Proteins, 65,
280-284.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.Cliff,
R.Harris,
D.Barford,
J.E.Ladbury,
and
M.A.Williams
(2006).
Conformational diversity in the TPR domain-mediated interaction of protein phosphatase 5 with Hsp90.
|
| |
Structure, 14,
415-426.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.R.Bushell,
S.P.Bottomley,
J.Rossjohn,
and
T.Beddoe
(2006).
Tracking the unfolding pathway of a multirepeat protein via tryptophan scanning: evidence of localized instability in the mitochondrial import receptor Tom70.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 281,
24345-24350.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.G.Wilson,
T.Kajander,
and
L.Regan
(2005).
The crystal structure of NlpI. A prokaryotic tetratricopeptide repeat protein with a globular fold.
|
| |
FEBS J, 272,
166-179.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.K.Binz,
P.Amstutz,
and
A.Plückthun
(2005).
Engineering novel binding proteins from nonimmunoglobulin domains.
|
| |
Nat Biotechnol, 23,
1257-1268.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Kim,
S.Sitaraman,
A.Hierro,
B.M.Beach,
G.Odorizzi,
and
J.H.Hurley
(2005).
Structural basis for endosomal targeting by the Bro1 domain.
|
| |
Dev Cell, 8,
937-947.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
V.M.Bolanos-Garcia,
S.Beaufils,
A.Renault,
J.G.Grossmann,
S.Brewerton,
M.Lee,
A.Venkitaraman,
and
T.L.Blundell
(2005).
The conserved N-terminal region of the mitotic checkpoint protein BUBR1: a putative TPR motif of high surface activity.
|
| |
Biophys J, 89,
2640-2649.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Pekkala,
R.Hieta,
U.Bergmann,
K.I.Kivirikko,
R.K.Wierenga,
and
J.Myllyharju
(2004).
The peptide-substrate-binding domain of collagen prolyl 4-hydroxylases is a tetratricopeptide repeat domain with functional aromatic residues.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 279,
52255-52261.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Forrer,
H.K.Binz,
M.T.Stumpp,
and
A.Plückthun
(2004).
Consensus design of repeat proteins.
|
| |
Chembiochem, 5,
183-189.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Beddoe,
S.R.Bushell,
M.A.Perugini,
T.Lithgow,
T.D.Mulhern,
S.P.Bottomley,
and
J.Rossjohn
(2004).
A biophysical analysis of the tetratricopeptide repeat-rich mitochondrial import receptor, Tom70, reveals an elongated monomer that is inherently flexible, unstable, and unfolds via a multistate pathway.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 279,
46448-46454.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.R.Main,
S.E.Jackson,
and
L.Regan
(2003).
The folding and design of repeat proteins: reaching a consensus.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol, 13,
482-489.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.W.Tripp,
and
D.Barrick
(2003).
Folding by consensus.
|
| |
Structure, 11,
486-487.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Liao,
I.M.Willis,
and
R.D.Moir
(2003).
The Brf1 and Bdp1 subunits of transcription factor TFIIIB bind to overlapping sites in the tetratricopeptide repeats of Tfc4.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 278,
44467-44474.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|