 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antitumor protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1n5o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Cellular component
|
intracellular
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
DNA repair
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
DNA binding
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
278:2630-2635
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural consequences of a cancer-causing BRCA1-BRCT missense mutation.
|
|
R.S.Williams,
J.N.Glover.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The integrity of the carboxyl-terminal BRCT repeat region is critical for BRCA1
tumor suppressor function; however, the molecular details of how a number of
clinically derived BRCT missense mutations affect BRCA1 function remain largely
unknown. Here we assess the structural response of the BRCT tandem repeat domain
to a well characterized, cancer-associated single amino acid substitution,
Met-1775 --> Arg-1775. The structure of BRCT-M1775R reveals that the mutated
side chain is extruded from the protein hydrophobic core, thereby altering the
protein surface. Charge-charge repulsion, rearrangement of the hydrophobic core,
and disruption of the native hydrogen bonding network at the interface between
the two BRCT repeats contribute to the conformational instability of
BRCT-M1775R. Destabilization and global unfolding of the mutated BRCT domain at
physiological temperatures explain the pleiotropic molecular and genetic defects
associated with the BRCA1-M1775R protein.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Evolutionary conservation of the Met-1775 packing
environment. A, ribbons diagram of the BRCT repeat region of
BRCA1. Met-1775 ( red) in BRCT-WT is positioned between the two
BRCT fold repeats. Met-1775 (red surface) lies in a hydrophobic
pocket created by Leu-1701, Phe-1704, Leu-1780, Met-1783 (behind
Met-1775), Arg-1835, and Leu-1839 (gray surfaces). B, multiple
sequence alignment of BRCA1 homologues for the BRCT regions
surrounding Met-1775. Met-1775 is red, and contacting amino
acids are blue. Numbering is for human BRCA1.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. Structural rearrangements accommodate M1775R. A,
native hydrogen bonding interactions proximal to Met-1775.
Hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed lines. B, hydrogen
bonding, salt bridging for mutant M1775R. Arg-1775 participates
in the coordination of two solvent anions, S1 and S2, and has
been flipped out from the hydrophobic pocket where Met-1775
normally packs. C, cutaway view of the hydrophobic core of the
BRCT. Structural overlay of WT ( gray with red surface) and
M1775R (gold with gray surface) hydrophobic core residues that
move upon mutation. D, charge potential GRASP surface for
BRCT-WT. Blue surface reflects positive charge potential, and
red is negative. The arrow indicates a hydrophobic groove near
Met-1775. E, charge potential GRASP surface for BRCT-M1775R.
Green spheres mark the positions of bound anions.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2003,
278,
2630-2635)
copyright 2003.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
L.Guidugli,
C.Rugani,
G.Lombardi,
P.Aretini,
A.Galli,
and
M.A.Caligo
(2011).
A recombination-based method to characterize human BRCA1 missense variants.
|
| |
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 125,
265-272.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Borg,
R.W.Haile,
K.E.Malone,
M.Capanu,
A.Diep,
T.Törngren,
S.Teraoka,
C.B.Begg,
D.C.Thomas,
P.Concannon,
L.Mellemkjaer,
L.Bernstein,
L.Tellhed,
S.Xue,
E.R.Olson,
X.Liang,
J.Dolle,
A.L.Børresen-Dale,
and
J.L.Bernstein
(2010).
Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance in unilateral and bilateral breast cancer: the WECARE study.
|
| |
Hum Mutat, 31,
E1200-E1240.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Wu,
L.Y.Lu,
and
X.Yu
(2010).
The role of BRCA1 in DNA damage response.
|
| |
Protein Cell, 1,
117-123.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Campbell,
R.A.Edwards,
and
J.N.Glover
(2010).
Comparison of the structures and peptide binding specificities of the BRCT domains of MDC1 and BRCA1.
|
| |
Structure, 18,
167-176.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Drikos,
G.Nounesis,
and
C.E.Vorgias
(2009).
Characterization of cancer-linked BRCA1-BRCT missense variants and their interaction with phosphoprotein targets.
|
| |
Proteins, 77,
464-476.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Carvalho,
M.A.Pino,
R.Karchin,
J.Beddor,
M.Godinho-Netto,
R.D.Mesquita,
R.S.Rodarte,
D.C.Vaz,
V.A.Monteiro,
S.Manoukian,
M.Colombo,
C.B.Ripamonti,
R.Rosenquist,
G.Suthers,
A.Borg,
P.Radice,
S.A.Grist,
A.N.Monteiro,
and
B.Billack
(2009).
Analysis of a set of missense, frameshift, and in-frame deletion variants of BRCA1.
|
| |
Mutat Res, 660,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.J.Couch,
L.J.Rasmussen,
R.Hofstra,
A.N.Monteiro,
M.S.Greenblatt,
N.de Wind,
P.Boffetta,
F.Couch,
N.de Wind,
D.Easton,
D.Eccles,
W.Foulkes,
M.Genuardi,
D.Goldgar,
M.Greenblatt,
R.Hofstra,
F.Hogervorst,
N.Hoogerbrugge,
S.Plon,
P.Radice,
L.Rasmussen,
O.Sinilnikova,
A.Spurdle,
and
S.V.Tavtigian
(2008).
Assessment of functional effects of unclassified genetic variants.
|
| |
Hum Mutat, 29,
1314-1326.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Tischkowitz,
N.Hamel,
M.A.Carvalho,
G.Birrane,
A.Soni,
E.H.van Beers,
S.A.Joosse,
N.Wong,
D.Novak,
L.A.Quenneville,
S.A.Grist,
P.M.Nederlof,
D.E.Goldgar,
S.V.Tavtigian,
A.N.Monteiro,
J.A.Ladias,
and
W.D.Foulkes
(2008).
Pathogenicity of the BRCA1 missense variant M1775K is determined by the disruption of the BRCT phosphopeptide-binding pocket: a multi-modal approach.
|
| |
Eur J Hum Genet, 16,
820-832.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.A.Edwards,
M.S.Lee,
S.E.Tsutakawa,
R.S.Williams,
J.A.Tainer,
and
J.N.Glover
(2008).
The BARD1 C-terminal domain structure and interactions with polyadenylation factor CstF-50.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 47,
11446-11456.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.C.Lee,
A.S.Lee,
and
K.B.Li
(2008).
Incorporating the amino acid properties to predict the significance of missense mutations.
|
| |
Amino Acids, 35,
615-626.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.De Silva,
E.H.Karunanayake,
K.H.Tennekoon,
M.Allen,
I.Amarasinghe,
P.Angunawala,
and
M.H.Ziard
(2008).
Novel sequence variants and a high frequency of recurrent polymorphisms in BRCA1 gene in Sri Lankan breast cancer patients and at risk individuals.
|
| |
BMC Cancer, 8,
214.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Nominé,
M.V.Botuyan,
Z.Bajzer,
W.G.Owen,
A.J.Caride,
E.Wasielewski,
and
G.Mer
(2008).
Kinetic analysis of interaction of BRCA1 tandem breast cancer c-terminal domains with phosphorylated peptides reveals two binding conformations.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 47,
9866-9879.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Shen,
and
L.Tong
(2008).
Structural evidence for direct interactions between the BRCT domains of human BRCA1 and a phospho-peptide from human ACC1.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 47,
5767-5773.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Gough,
T.Gojobori,
and
T.Imanishi
(2007).
Cancer-related mutations in BRCA1-BRCT cause long-range structural changes in protein-protein binding sites: a molecular dynamics study.
|
| |
Proteins, 66,
69-86.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.K.Lovelock,
A.B.Spurdle,
M.T.Mok,
D.J.Farrugia,
S.R.Lakhani,
S.Healey,
S.Arnold,
D.Buchanan,
K.Investigators,
F.J.Couch,
B.R.Henderson,
D.E.Goldgar,
S.V.Tavtigian,
G.Chenevix-Trench,
and
M.A.Brown
(2007).
Identification of BRCA1 missense substitutions that confer partial functional activity: potential moderate risk variants?
|
| |
Breast Cancer Res, 9,
R82.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Vasickova,
E.Machackova,
M.Lukesova,
J.Damborsky,
O.Horky,
H.Pavlu,
J.Kuklova,
V.Kosinova,
M.Navratilova,
and
L.Foretova
(2007).
High occurrence of BRCA1 intragenic rearrangements in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome in the Czech Republic.
|
| |
BMC Med Genet, 8,
32.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.N.Glover
(2006).
Insights into the molecular basis of human hereditary breast cancer from studies of the BRCA1 BRCT domain.
|
| |
Fam Cancer, 5,
89-93.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.B.Mullan,
J.E.Quinn,
and
D.P.Harkin
(2006).
The role of BRCA1 in transcriptional regulation and cell cycle control.
|
| |
Oncogene, 25,
5854-5863.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.K.Lovelock,
S.Healey,
W.Au,
E.Y.Sum,
A.Tesoriero,
E.M.Wong,
S.Hinson,
R.Brinkworth,
A.Bekessy,
O.Diez,
L.Izatt,
E.Solomon,
M.Jenkins,
H.Renard,
J.Hopper,
P.Waring,
S.V.Tavtigian,
D.Goldgar,
G.J.Lindeman,
J.E.Visvader,
F.J.Couch,
B.R.Henderson,
M.Southey,
G.Chenevix-Trench,
A.B.Spurdle,
and
M.A.Brown
(2006).
Genetic, functional, and histopathological evaluation of two C-terminal BRCA1 missense variants.
|
| |
J Med Genet, 43,
74-83.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.J.Majdak,
J.Debniak,
T.Milczek,
C.J.Cornelisse,
P.Devilee,
J.Emerich,
J.Jassem,
and
G.H.De Bock
(2005).
Prognostic impact of BRCA1 pathogenic and BRCA1/BRCA2 unclassified variant mutations in patients with ovarian carcinoma.
|
| |
Cancer, 104,
1004-1012.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.S.Williams,
N.Bernstein,
M.S.Lee,
M.L.Rakovszky,
D.Cui,
R.Green,
M.Weinfeld,
and
J.N.Glover
(2005).
Structural basis for phosphorylation-dependent signaling in the DNA-damage response.
|
| |
Biochem Cell Biol, 83,
721-727.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.A.Clapperton,
I.A.Manke,
D.M.Lowery,
T.Ho,
L.F.Haire,
M.B.Yaffe,
and
S.J.Smerdon
(2004).
Structure and mechanism of BRCA1 BRCT domain recognition of phosphorylated BACH1 with implications for cancer.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol, 11,
512-518.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.N.Glover,
R.S.Williams,
and
M.S.Lee
(2004).
Interactions between BRCT repeats and phosphoproteins: tangled up in two.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci, 29,
579-585.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.S.Williams,
M.S.Lee,
D.D.Hau,
and
J.N.Glover
(2004).
Structural basis of phosphopeptide recognition by the BRCT domain of BRCA1.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol, 11,
519-525.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|