 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protein transport
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1mhq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
intracellular protein transport
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
FEBS Lett
537:171-176
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Crystal structure of GGA2 VHS domain and its implication in plasticity in the ligand binding pocket.
|
|
G.Zhu,
X.He,
P.Zhai,
S.Terzyan,
J.Tang,
X.C.Zhang.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Golgi-localized, gamma-ear-containing, ARF binding (GGA) proteins regulate
intracellular vesicle transport by recognizing sorting signals on the cargo
surface in the initial step of the budding process. The VHS (VPS27, Hrs, and
STAM) domain of GGA binds with the signal peptides. Here, a crystal structure of
the VHS domain of GGA2 is reported at 2.2 A resolution, which permits a direct
comparison with that of homologous proteins, GGA1 and GGA3. Significant
structural difference is present in the loop between helices 6 and 7, which
forms part of the ligand binding pocket. Intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopic
study indicates that this loop undergoes a conformational change upon ligand
binding. Thus, the current structure suggests that a conformational change
induced by ligand binding occurs in this part of the ligand pocket.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Crystal structure of GGA2 VHS domain. a: A ribbon
diagram with helices α1–α8 and the visible amino (N)- and
carboxyl (C)-termini labeled. b: A molecular surface model in an
orientation similar to a. Color coded are the amino acid residue
conserveness of GGA2 compared with GGA1 and GGA3: white for
identical to both, green for identical to either GGA1 or GGA3,
and orange for different from both. c: The same as b but with a
180° rotation about the vertical axis. The ligand ACDL binding
site, L[6,7] loop and visible N- and C-termini are labeled. This
figure and Fig. 2 were drawn with programs MolScript, Raster3D
or Grasp [27, 28 and 29].
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Intrinsic fluorescence spectra of VHS/GGA2. Typical
emission spectra of WT (top) and W122R mutant (bottom) of
VHS/GGA2 in the absence (solid line) and presence (dashed line)
of the CI-MPR peptide are shown, which suggest that GGA2 Trp^122
was subjected to an environmental change upon ligand binding.
Fluorescence intensities are shown in an arbitrary unit.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the Federation of European Biochemical Societies:
FEBS Lett
(2003,
537,
171-176)
copyright 2003.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.Hirst,
D.A.Sahlender,
M.Choma,
R.Sinka,
M.E.Harbour,
M.Parkinson,
and
M.S.Robinson
(2009).
Spatial and functional relationship of GGAs and AP-1 in Drosophila and HeLa cells.
|
| |
Traffic, 10,
1696-1710.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.H.Hurley,
and
S.D.Emr
(2006).
The ESCRT complexes: structure and mechanism of a membrane-trafficking network.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 35,
277-298.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Xie,
D.Boyle,
D.Sanford,
P.E.Scherer,
J.E.Pessin,
and
S.Mora
(2006).
Intracellular trafficking and secretion of adiponectin is dependent on GGA-coated vesicles.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 281,
7253-7259.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Dennes,
C.Cromme,
K.Suresh,
N.S.Kumar,
J.A.Eble,
A.Hahnenkamp,
and
R.Pohlmann
(2005).
The novel Drosophila lysosomal enzyme receptor protein mediates lysosomal sorting in mammalian cells and binds mammalian and Drosophila GGA adaptors.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 280,
12849-12857.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.J.Owen,
B.M.Collins,
and
P.R.Evans
(2004).
Adaptors for clathrin coats: structure and function.
|
| |
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 20,
153-191.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.S.Bonifacino
(2004).
The GGA proteins: adaptors on the move.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 5,
23-32.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Nakayama,
and
S.Wakatsuki
(2003).
The structure and function of GGAs, the traffic controllers at the TGN sorting crossroads.
|
| |
Cell Struct Funct, 28,
431-442.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Ghosh,
J.Griffith,
H.J.Geuze,
and
S.Kornfeld
(2003).
Mammalian GGAs act together to sort mannose 6-phosphate receptors.
|
| |
J Cell Biol, 163,
755-766.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.He,
G.Zhu,
G.Koelsch,
K.K.Rodgers,
X.C.Zhang,
and
J.Tang
(2003).
Biochemical and structural characterization of the interaction of memapsin 2 (beta-secretase) cytosolic domain with the VHS domain of GGA proteins.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 42,
12174-12180.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|