spacer
spacer
Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands metals links
Oxidoreductase PDB id
1me7
Jmol
Contents
Protein chain
365 a.a. *
Ligands
RVP
MOA
Metals
_NA
__K
Waters ×120
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
1me7
Name: Oxidoreductase
Title: Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (impdh) from tritrichomo with rvp and moa bound
Structure: Inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase. Chain: a. Synonym: imp dehydrogenase, impdh. Engineered: yes
Source: Tritrichomonas foetus. Organism_taxid: 5724. Gene: impdh. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
Biol. unit: Tetramer (from PDB file)
Resolution:
2.15Å     R-factor:   0.233     R-free:   0.264
Authors: G.L.Prosise,J.Wu,H.Luecke
Key ref:
G.L.Prosise et al. (2002). Crystal structure of Tritrichomonas foetus inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase in complex with the inhibitor ribavirin monophosphate reveals a catalysis-dependent ion-binding site. J Biol Chem, 277, 50654-50659. PubMed id: 12235158 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M208330200
Date:
08-Aug-02     Release date:   14-Jan-03    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P50097  (IMDH_TRIFO) -  Inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase
Seq:
Struc:
503 a.a.
365 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain

 Enzyme reactions 
   Enzyme class: E.C.1.1.1.205  - Imp dehydrogenase.
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]

      Pathway:
AMP and GMP Biosynthesis
      Reaction: Inosine 5'-phosphate + NAD+ + H2O = xanthosine 5'-phosphate + NADH
Inosine 5'-phosphate
Bound ligand (Het Group name = RVP)
matches with 83.33% similarity
+ NAD(+)
+ H(2)O
= xanthosine 5'-phosphate
+ NADH
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the KEGG ftp site
 Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation 
  GO annot!
  Biological process     metabolic process   4 terms 
  Biochemical function     catalytic activity     8 terms  

 

 
    reference    
 
 
DOI no: 10.1074/jbc.M208330200 J Biol Chem 277:50654-50659 (2002)
PubMed id: 12235158  
 
 
Crystal structure of Tritrichomonas foetus inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase in complex with the inhibitor ribavirin monophosphate reveals a catalysis-dependent ion-binding site.
G.L.Prosise, J.Z.Wu, H.Luecke.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) catalyzes the rate-limiting step in GMP biosynthesis. The resulting intracellular pool of guanine nucleotides is of great importance to all cells for use in DNA and RNA synthesis, metabolism, and signal transduction. The enzyme binds IMP and the cofactor NAD(+) in random order, IMP is converted to XMP, NAD(+) is reduced to NADH, and finally, NADH and then XMP are released sequentially. XMP is subsequently converted into GMP by GMP synthetase. Drugs that decrease GMP synthesis by inhibiting IMPDH have been shown to have antiproliferative as well as antiviral activity. Several drugs are in use that target the substrate- or cofactor-binding site; however, due to differences between the mammalian and microbial isoforms, most drugs are far less effective against the microbial form of the enzyme than the mammalian form. The high resolution crystal structures of the protozoan parasite Tritrichomonas foetus IMPDH complexed with the inhibitor ribavirin monophosphate as well as monophosphate together with a second inhibitor, mycophenolic acid, are presented here. These structures reveal an active site cation identified previously only in the Chinese hamster IMPDH structure with covalently bound IMP. This cation was not found previously in apo IMPDH, IMPDH in complex with XMP, or covalently bound inhibitor, indicating that the cation-binding site may be catalysis-dependent. A comparison of T. foetus IMPDH with the Chinese hamster and Streptococcus pyogenes structures reveals differences in the active site loop architecture, which contributes to differences in cation binding during the catalytic sequence and the kinetic rates between bacterial, protozoan, and mammalian enzymes. Exploitation of these differences may lead to novel inhibitors, which favor the microbial form of the enzyme.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Ribbon diagram of the IMPDH tetramer viewed looking down the 4-fold axis. The enzyme is in complex with the inhibitor RMP (Corey-Pauling-Koltun (CPK) graphic) and a sodium ion (green). A potassium ion (blue) lies in the dimer interface near the cofactor-binding site. This image was made in Deepview (35) and rendered in POVRAY 3.5 beta (www.povray.org).
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. Composite annealed omit electron density maps at 1.9 Å resolution surrounding the inhibitor RMP. a, RMP-only co-crystal density contoured at 1.8 . The MPA-soaked RMP co-crystal structure (b) at 2.2 Å shows nearly complete density for MPA only when contoured at 0.5 despite soaking in saturating amounts of MPA. Soaking for longer periods did not improve occupancy.
 
  The above figures are reprinted by permission from the ASBMB: J Biol Chem (2002, 277, 50654-50659) copyright 2002.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
21081761 V.Usha, S.S.Gurcha, A.L.Lovering, A.J.Lloyd, A.Papaemmanouil, R.C.Reynolds, and G.S.Besra (2011).
Identification of novel diphenyl urea inhibitors of Mt-GuaB2 active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
  Microbiology, 157, 290-299.  
21035731 D.R.Gollapalli, I.S.Macpherson, G.Liechti, S.K.Gorla, J.B.Goldberg, and L.Hedstrom (2010).
Structural determinants of inhibitor selectivity in prokaryotic IMP dehydrogenases.
  Chem Biol, 17, 1084-1091.  
19480389 L.Hedstrom (2009).
IMP dehydrogenase: structure, mechanism, and inhibition.
  Chem Rev, 109, 2903-2928.  
19919089 S.Das, A.Kokardekar, and C.M.Breneman (2009).
Rapid comparison of protein binding site surfaces with property encoded shape distributions.
  J Chem Inf Model, 49, 2863-2872.  
15155243 J.Vollmer, R.Rankin, H.Hartmann, M.Jurk, U.Samulowitz, T.Wader, A.Janosch, C.Schetter, and A.M.Krieg (2004).
Immunopharmacology of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides and ribavirin.
  Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 48, 2314-2317.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time.