 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unknown function
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1ljo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
320:129-142
(2002)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Archaeal Sm proteins form heptameric and hexameric complexes: crystal structures of the Sm1 and Sm2 proteins from the hyperthermophile Archaeoglobus fulgidus.
|
|
I.Törö,
J.Basquin,
H.Teo-Dreher,
D.Suck.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Proteins of largely unknown function related to the Sm proteins present in the
core domain of eukaryotic small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles have
recently been detected in Archaea. In contrast to eukaryotes, Archaea contain
maximally two distinct Sm-related proteins belonging to different subfamilies,
we refer to as Sm1 and Sm2. Here we report the crystal structures of the Sm1-
and Sm2-type proteins from the hyperthermophilic euryarchaeon Archaeoglobus
fulgidus (AF-Sm1 and AF-Sm2) at a resolution of 2.5 and 1.95 A, respectively.
While the AF-Sm1 protein forms a heptameric ring structure similar to that found
in other archaeal Sm1-type proteins, the AF-Sm2 protein unexpectedly forms a
homo-hexamer in the crystals, and, as is evident from the mass spectrometric
analysis, also in solution. Both proteins have essentially the same monomer fold
and inter-subunit beta-sheet hydrogen bonding giving rise to a similar overall
architecture of the doughnut-shaped six and seven-membered rings. In addition, a
conserved uracil-binding pocket identified previously in an AF-Sm1/RNA complex,
suggests a common RNA-binding mode for the AF-Sm1 and AF-Sm2 proteins, in line
with solution studies showing preferential binding to U-rich oligonucleotides
for both proteins. Clear differences are however seen in the charge distribution
within the two structures. The rough faces of the rings, i.e. the faces not
containing the base binding pockets, have opposite charges in the two
structures, being predominantly positive in AF-Sm1 and negative in AF-Sm2.
Differences in the ionic interactions between subunits provide an explanation
for the distinctly different oligomerisation behaviour of the AF-Sm1 and AF-Sm2
proteins and of Sm1- and Sm2-type proteins in general, as well as the stability
of their complexes. Implications for the functions of archaeal Sm proteins are
being discussed.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Structure of the AF-Sm1 heptamer and the AF-Sm2
hexamer. (a) Ribbon representation of the AF-Sm1 heptamer and
the AF-Sm2 hexamer (top and side view). For clarity, the
monomers are drawn alternately in red and green, and one monomer
in AF-Sm1 is depicted in yellow. (b) Electrostatic surface
charge potential showing the two faces of the rings. Shown on
the left is the side binding the RNA and containing the
N-terminal helix (corresponding to the top view shown in (a)).
It is relatively flat, while the other side exhibits pronounced
grooves emanating from the centre. These grooves are positively
charged in AF-Sm1 (as indicated by the blue colour), but
negatively charged in AF-Sm2, giving rise to oppositely charged
faces on the rough side of the rings. The Figure was produced
with GRASP.[41.]
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Dimer contacts in the AF-Sm1 (top) and AF-Sm2
(bottom) oligomers. (a) The molecules are shown as grey coloured
ribbons for the pair of interacting molecules highlighting the
interacting side-chains by red and blue colours. Side-chains
involved in contacts (<4.0 Å), located mainly on b-strands
4 and 5 as well as the N-terminal helix, are represented in
ball-and-stick mode. (b) Ionic interactions stabilising the
AF-Sm1 heptamer (relevant distances (in Å) are indicated).
These contacts are not present in AF-Sm2. The Figure was
produced with MOLSCRIPT.[40.]
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2002,
320,
129-142)
copyright 2002.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.K.Leung,
K.Nagai,
and
J.Li
(2011).
Structure of the spliceosomal U4 snRNP core domain and its implication for snRNP biogenesis.
|
| |
Nature, 473,
536-539.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Fischer,
J.Benz,
B.Späth,
A.Jellen-Ritter,
R.Heyer,
M.Dörr,
L.K.Maier,
C.Menzel-Hobeck,
M.Lehr,
K.Jantzer,
J.Babski,
J.Soppa,
and
A.Marchfelder
(2011).
Regulatory RNAs in Haloferax volcanii.
|
| |
Biochem Soc Trans, 39,
159-162.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.C.Lybecker,
C.A.Abel,
A.L.Feig,
and
D.S.Samuels
(2010).
Identification and function of the RNA chaperone Hfq in the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol, 78,
622-635.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.C.Godfrey,
A.E.White,
D.C.Tatomer,
W.F.Marzluff,
and
R.J.Duronio
(2009).
The Drosophila U7 snRNP proteins Lsm10 and Lsm11 are required for histone pre-mRNA processing and play an essential role in development.
|
| |
RNA, 15,
1661-1672.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Das,
P.Kozbial,
H.L.Axelrod,
M.D.Miller,
D.McMullan,
S.S.Krishna,
P.Abdubek,
C.Acosta,
T.Astakhova,
P.Burra,
D.Carlton,
C.Chen,
H.J.Chiu,
T.Clayton,
M.C.Deller,
L.Duan,
Y.Elias,
M.A.Elsliger,
D.Ernst,
C.Farr,
J.Feuerhelm,
A.Grzechnik,
S.K.Grzechnik,
J.Hale,
G.W.Han,
L.Jaroszewski,
K.K.Jin,
H.A.Johnson,
H.E.Klock,
M.W.Knuth,
A.Kumar,
D.Marciano,
A.T.Morse,
K.D.Murphy,
E.Nigoghossian,
A.Nopakun,
L.Okach,
S.Oommachen,
J.Paulsen,
C.Puckett,
R.Reyes,
C.L.Rife,
N.Sefcovic,
S.Sudek,
H.Tien,
C.Trame,
C.V.Trout,
H.van den Bedem,
D.Weekes,
A.White,
Q.Xu,
K.O.Hodgson,
J.Wooley,
A.M.Deacon,
A.Godzik,
S.A.Lesley,
and
I.A.Wilson
(2009).
Crystal structure of a novel Sm-like protein of putative cyanophage origin at 2.60 A resolution.
|
| |
Proteins, 75,
296-307.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Blombach,
K.S.Makarova,
J.Marrero,
B.Siebers,
E.V.Koonin,
and
J.van der Oost
(2009).
Identification of an ortholog of the eukaryotic RNA polymerase III subunit RPC34 in Crenarchaeota and Thaumarchaeota suggests specialization of RNA polymerases for coding and non-coding RNAs in Archaea.
|
| |
Biol Direct, 4,
39.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Veretnik,
C.Wills,
P.Youkharibache,
R.E.Valas,
and
P.E.Bourne
(2009).
Sm/Lsm genes provide a glimpse into the early evolution of the spliceosome.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol, 5,
e1000315.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.G.Scofield,
and
M.Lynch
(2008).
Evolutionary diversification of the Sm family of RNA-associated proteins.
|
| |
Mol Biol Evol, 25,
2255-2267.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.S.Nielsen,
A.Bøggild,
C.B.Andersen,
G.Nielsen,
A.Boysen,
D.E.Brodersen,
and
P.Valentin-Hansen
(2007).
An Hfq-like protein in archaea: crystal structure and functional characterization of the Sm protein from Methanococcus jannaschii.
|
| |
RNA, 13,
2213-2223.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.H.Chin,
S.K.Ruan,
A.H.Wang,
and
S.H.Chou
(2007).
XC5848, an ORFan protein from Xanthomonas campestris, adopts a novel variant of Sm-like motif.
|
| |
Proteins, 68,
1006-1010.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.K.Ruan,
K.H.Chin,
H.L.Shr,
P.C.Lyu,
A.H.Wang,
and
S.H.Chou
(2007).
Preliminary X-ray analysis of XC5848, a hypothetical ORFan protein with an Sm-like motif from Xanthomonas campestris.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun, 63,
30-33.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Kilic,
S.Sanglier,
A.Van Dorsselaer,
and
D.Suck
(2006).
Oligomerization behavior of the archaeal Sm2-type protein from Archaeoglobus fulgidus.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 15,
2310-2317.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Nikulin,
E.Stolboushkina,
A.Perederina,
I.Vassilieva,
U.Blaesi,
I.Moll,
G.Kachalova,
S.Yokoyama,
D.Vassylyev,
M.Garber,
and
S.Nikonov
(2005).
Structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Hfq protein.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 61,
141-146.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.J.Pruijn
(2005).
Doughnuts dealing with RNA.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol, 12,
562-564.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Ye,
and
D.J.Patel
(2005).
RNA silencing suppressor p21 of Beet yellows virus forms an RNA binding octameric ring structure.
|
| |
Structure, 13,
1375-1384.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Kilic,
S.Thore,
and
D.Suck
(2005).
Crystal structure of an archaeal Sm protein from Sulfolobus solfataricus.
|
| |
Proteins, 61,
689-693.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Albrecht,
M.Golatta,
U.Wüllner,
and
T.Lengauer
(2004).
Structural and functional analysis of ataxin-2 and ataxin-3.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem, 271,
3155-3170.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.J.Mikulecky,
M.K.Kaw,
C.C.Brescia,
J.C.Takach,
D.D.Sledjeski,
and
A.L.Feig
(2004).
Escherichia coli Hfq has distinct interaction surfaces for DsrA, rpoS and poly(A) RNAs.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol, 11,
1206-1214.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Valentin-Hansen,
M.Eriksen,
and
C.Udesen
(2004).
The bacterial Sm-like protein Hfq: a key player in RNA transactions.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol, 51,
1525-1533.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Anantharaman,
and
L.Aravind
(2004).
Novel conserved domains in proteins with predicted roles in eukaryotic cell-cycle regulation, decapping and RNA stability.
|
| |
BMC Genomics, 5,
45.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.M.Collins,
L.Cubeddu,
N.Naidoo,
S.J.Harrop,
G.D.Kornfeld,
I.W.Dawes,
P.M.Curmi,
and
B.C.Mabbutt
(2003).
Homomeric ring assemblies of eukaryotic Sm proteins have affinity for both RNA and DNA. Crystal structure of an oligomeric complex of yeast SmF.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 278,
17291-17298.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Mura,
A.Kozhukhovsky,
M.Gingery,
M.Phillips,
and
D.Eisenberg
(2003).
The oligomerization and ligand-binding properties of Sm-like archaeal proteins (SmAPs).
|
| |
Protein Sci, 12,
832-847.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Mura,
M.Phillips,
A.Kozhukhovsky,
and
D.Eisenberg
(2003).
Structure and assembly of an augmented Sm-like archaeal protein 14-mer.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100,
4539-4544.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Sauter,
J.Basquin,
and
D.Suck
(2003).
Sm-like proteins in Eubacteria: the crystal structure of the Hfq protein from Escherichia coli.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 31,
4091-4098.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Thore,
C.Mayer,
C.Sauter,
S.Weeks,
and
D.Suck
(2003).
Crystal structures of the Pyrococcus abyssi Sm core and its complex with RNA. Common features of RNA binding in archaea and eukarya.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 278,
1239-1247.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Aloy,
and
R.B.Russell
(2002).
The third dimension for protein interactions and complexes.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci, 27,
633-638.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|