 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
signal transduction
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
cAMP-dependent protein kinase regulator activity
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Eur J Biochem
269:2040-2051
(2002)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Electrostatic properties of the structure of the docking and dimerization domain of protein kinase A IIalpha.
|
|
D.Morikis,
M.Roy,
M.G.Newlon,
J.D.Scott,
P.A.Jennings.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The structure of the N-terminal docking and dimerization domain of the type
IIalpha regulatory subunit (RIIalpha D/D) of protein kinase A (PKA) forms a
noncovalent stand-alone X-type four-helix bundle structural motif, consisting of
two helix-loop-helix monomers. RIIalpha D/D possesses a strong hydrophobic core
and two distinct, exposed faces. A hydrophobic face with a groove is the site of
protein-protein interactions necessary for subcellular localization. A highly
charged face, opposite to the former, may be involved in regulation of
protein-protein interactions as a result of changes in phosphorylation state of
the regulatory subunit. Although recent studies have addressed the hydrophobic
character of packing of RIIalpha D/D and revealed the function of the
hydrophobic face as the binding site to A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs),
little attention has been paid to the charges involved in structure and
function. To examine the electrostatic character of the structure of RIIalpha
D/D we have predicted mean apparent pKa values, based on Poisson-Boltzmann
electrostatic calculations, using an ensemble of calculated dimer structures. We
propose that the helix promoting sequence Glu34-X-X-X-Arg38 stabilizes the
second helix of each monomer, through the formation of a (i, i +4) side chain
salt bridge. We show that a weak inter-helical hydrogen bond between Tyr35-Glu19
of each monomer contributes to tertiary packing and may be responsible for
discriminating from alternative quaternary packing of the two monomers. We also
show that an inter-monomer hydrogen bond between Asp30-Arg40 contributes to
quaternary packing. We propose that the charged face comprising of
Asp27-Asp30-Glu34-Arg38-Arg40-Glu41-Arg43-Arg44 may be necessary to provide
flexibility or stability in the region between the C-terminus and the
interdomain/autoinhibitory sequence of RIIalpha, depending on the activation
state of PKA. We also discuss the structural requirements necessary for the
formation of a stacked (rather than intertwined) dimer, which has consequences
for the orientation of the functionally important and distinct faces.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. The hydrophobic and electrostatic character of RI
D/D.(A) A
backbone representation of residues 9–41 of the ensemble of
the 24 lowest energy structures of RII D/D. Only side
chains of residues with hydrophobic character (Val, Leu, Ile,
Phe, Tyr, Thr) are shown (coloured in green). Monomer 1 is
coloured in yellow and monomer 2 is coloured in grey. (B) The
top view of a van der Waals sphere model of the best (closest to
the mean) structure of RII D/D, in an
orientation rotated by 90° about the x-axis from the
orientation of (A). The colours of the two monomers (yellow and
grey) and of the hydrophobic residues (green) are as in (A). The
dense hydrophobic face (green atoms) is the binding site of the
AKAP peptides. (C) The bottom view of a van der Waals sphere
model of the best structure of RII D/D, in an
orientation rotated by 180° about the x-axis from the
orientation of (B). (D, E, F) Ribbon models of RII D/D (residues
-1 to 44) in the same orientation as in (A, B, C), respectively.
The view in (D) shows the nearly antiparallel arrangement of
helices I, I' and II, II'. Views in (E, F) demonstrate the
four-helix bundle structural motif of RII D/D. (G) A
backbone representation of RII D/D (residues
9–41), showing the backbone of the monomers 1 (yellow) and 2
(grey) and charged side chains only. Positively charged side
chains (Arg, Lys, His) are shown in blue, and negatively charged
side chains (Asp, Glu) are shown in red. This view has the same
orientation as in (A) and (D). (H) The top view of a van der
Waals sphere representation of RII D/D. The
orientation of this view is the same as in (B) and (E). (I) The
bottom view of a van der Waals sphere representation of RII D/D. The
orientation of this view is the same as in (C) and (F), and
depicts the highly charged bottom face of RII D/D.
Individual panels in this Figure were generated using the
program molmol[27].
|
 |
Figure 6.
Fig. 6. Electrostatic interactions contributing to the
stability of RII D/D.(A)
Molecular representation of intra-monomer, intra-helical salt
bridge between side chains of Arg38 (in blue)–Glu34 (in red),
which stabilizes helix II or II' secondary structure. (B) Side
chain intra-monomer, inter-helical weak hydrogen bond Tyr35 (in
yellow)–Glu19 (in red), which stabilizes tertiary structure.
In both (A) (B) only one monomer is shown for clarity, with
helix I drawn in cyan and helix II drawn in magenta. (C)
Inter-monomer hydrogen bond between side chains of Arg40 (in
blue)–Asp30 (in red), which stabilizes quaternary structure.
The two monomers are drawn in yellow and green, respectively.
Only one pair of Arg40-Asp30 is shown for clarity.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the Federation of European Biochemical Societies:
Eur J Biochem
(2002,
269,
2040-2051)
copyright 2002.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Kieslich,
D.Morikis,
J.Yang,
and
D.Gunopulos
(2011).
Automated computational framework for the analysis of electrostatic similarities of proteins.
|
| |
Biotechnol Prog, 27,
316-325.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Kronberg,
R.Giacometti,
J.Ruiz-Herrera,
and
S.Passeron
(2011).
Characterization of the regulatory subunit of Yarrowia lipolytica cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Evidences of a monomeric protein.
|
| |
Arch Biochem Biophys, 509,
66-75.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.F.South,
I.M.Fingerman,
D.P.Mersman,
H.N.Du,
and
S.D.Briggs
(2010).
A conserved interaction between the SDI domain of Bre2 and the Dpy-30 domain of Sdc1 is required for histone methylation and gene expression.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 285,
595-607.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.L.Burns,
J.M.Canaves,
J.K.Pennypacker,
D.K.Blumenthal,
and
S.S.Taylor
(2003).
Isoform specific differences in binding of a dual-specificity A-kinase anchoring protein to type I and type II regulatory subunits of PKA.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 42,
5754-5763.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
|