 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1kw4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Nat Struct Biol
9:453-457
(2002)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The SAM domain of polyhomeotic forms a helical polymer.
|
|
C.A.Kim,
M.Gingery,
R.M.Pilpa,
J.U.Bowie.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The polycomb group (PcG) proteins are important in the maintenance of stable
repression patterns during development. Several PcG members contain a protein
protein interaction module called a SAM domain (also known as SPM, PNT and HLH).
Here we report the high-resolution structure of the SAM domain of polyhomeotic
(Ph). Ph-SAM forms a helical polymer structure, providing a likely mechanism for
the extension of PcG complexes. The structure of the polymer resembles that
formed by the SAM domain of another transcriptional repressor, TEL. The
formation of these polymer structures by SAM domains in two divergent repressors
suggests a conserved mode of repression involving a higher order chromatin
structure.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Electron micrograph of Ph-SAM.
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Polymeric structure of Ph-SAM L51R. a, Nine
subunits of the polymer viewed with the helix axis in the plane
of the paper. b, Same as (a) but viewed down the polymer helix
axis. c, A view of the interface. Each subunit of the polymer is
shaded in alternating colors. The residues comprising the apolar
domain are yellow, with the exception of the L51R mutant side
chain (gold). The atoms of the polar domain are colored as
follows: oxygen (red), nitrogen (blue), backbone carbon (black)
and water oxygen (magenta). d, A closer view of the hydrogen
bonds and salt bridges at the interface.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nat Struct Biol
(2002,
9,
453-457)
copyright 2002.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.Zhang,
T.G.Graham,
P.Vivekanand,
L.Cote,
M.Cetera,
and
I.Rebay
(2010).
Sterile alpha motif domain-mediated self-association plays an essential role in modulating the activity of the Drosophila ETS family transcriptional repressor Yan.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol, 30,
1158-1170.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.M.Di Pietro,
D.Cascio,
D.Feliciano,
J.U.Bowie,
and
G.S.Payne
(2010).
Regulation of clathrin adaptor function in endocytosis: novel role for the SAM domain.
|
| |
EMBO J, 29,
1033-1044.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Prieto-Echagüe,
A.Gucwa,
D.A.Brown,
and
W.T.Miller
(2010).
Regulation of Ack1 localization and activity by the amino-terminal SAM domain.
|
| |
BMC Biochem, 11,
42.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Bhunia,
P.N.Domadia,
H.Mohanram,
and
S.Bhattacharjya
(2009).
NMR structural studies of the Ste11 SAM domain in the dodecyl phosphocholine micelle.
|
| |
Proteins, 74,
328-343.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.D.Meruelo,
and
J.U.Bowie
(2009).
Identifying polymer-forming SAM domains.
|
| |
Proteins, 74,
1-5.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.N.Maertens,
S.El Messaoudi-Aubert,
T.Racek,
J.K.Stock,
J.Nicholls,
M.Rodriguez-Niedenführ,
J.Gil,
and
G.Peters
(2009).
Several distinct polycomb complexes regulate and co-localize on the INK4a tumor suppressor locus.
|
| |
PLoS One, 4,
e6380.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Leone,
J.Cellitti,
and
M.Pellecchia
(2009).
The Sam domain of the lipid phosphatase Ship2 adopts a common model to interact with Arap3-Sam and EphA2-Sam.
|
| |
BMC Struct Biol, 9,
59.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.B.Stathopulos,
and
M.Ikura
(2009).
Structurally delineating stromal interaction molecules as the endoplasmic reticulum calcium sensors and regulators of calcium release-activated calcium entry.
|
| |
Immunol Rev, 231,
113-131.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Shen,
J.Lau,
M.Zhu,
J.Zou,
D.Fuller,
Q.J.Li,
and
W.Zhang
(2009).
The importance of Src homology 2 domain-containing leukocyte phosphoprotein of 76 kilodaltons sterile-alpha motif domain in thymic selection and T-cell activation.
|
| |
Blood, 114,
74-84.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Leone,
J.Cellitti,
and
M.Pellecchia
(2008).
NMR studies of a heterotypic Sam-Sam domain association: the interaction between the lipid phosphatase Ship2 and the EphA2 receptor.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 47,
12721-12728.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.B.Stathopulos,
L.Zheng,
G.Y.Li,
M.J.Plevin,
and
M.Ikura
(2008).
Structural and mechanistic insights into STIM1-mediated initiation of store-operated calcium entry.
|
| |
Cell, 135,
110-122.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Kanno,
H.Janakiraman,
and
M.Kanno
(2008).
Epigenetic regulator polycomb group protein complexes control cell fate and cancer.
|
| |
Cancer Sci, 99,
1077-1084.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Rajakulendran,
M.Sahmi,
I.Kurinov,
M.Tyers,
M.Therrien,
and
F.Sicheri
(2008).
CNK and HYP form a discrete dimer by their SAM domains to mediate RAF kinase signaling.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105,
2836-2841.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.M.Deshpande,
J.D.Akunowicz,
X.T.Reveles,
B.B.Patel,
E.A.Saria,
R.G.Gorlick,
S.L.Naylor,
R.J.Leach,
and
M.F.Hansen
(2007).
PHC3, a component of the hPRC-H complex, associates with E2F6 during G0 and is lost in osteosarcoma tumors.
|
| |
Oncogene, 26,
1714-1722.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Ausiello,
D.Peluso,
A.Via,
and
M.Helmer-Citterich
(2007).
Local comparison of protein structures highlights cases of convergent evolution in analogous functional sites.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics, 8,
S24.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.D.Baker,
R.B.Beckstead,
D.J.Mangelsdorf,
and
C.S.Thummel
(2007).
Functional interactions between the Moses corepressor and DHR78 nuclear receptor regulate growth in Drosophila.
|
| |
Genes Dev, 21,
450-464.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Whitcomb,
A.Basu,
C.D.Allis,
and
E.Bernstein
(2007).
Polycomb Group proteins: an evolutionary perspective.
|
| |
Trends Genet, 23,
494-502.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Rimkus,
M.Martini,
J.Friederichs,
R.Rosenberg,
D.Doll,
J.R.Siewert,
B.Holzmann,
and
K.P.Janssen
(2006).
Prognostic significance of downregulated expression of the candidate tumour suppressor gene SASH1 in colon cancer.
|
| |
Br J Cancer, 95,
1419-1423.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Wu,
G.Jansen,
J.Zhang,
D.Y.Thomas,
and
M.Whiteway
(2006).
Adaptor protein Ste50p links the Ste11p MEKK to the HOG pathway through plasma membrane association.
|
| |
Genes Dev, 20,
734-746.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Qiao,
B.Harada,
H.Song,
J.Whitelegge,
A.J.Courey,
and
J.U.Bowie
(2006).
Mae inhibits Pointed-P2 transcriptional activity by blocking its MAPK docking site.
|
| |
EMBO J, 25,
70-79.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Y.Roignant,
S.Hamel,
F.Janody,
and
J.E.Treisman
(2006).
The novel SAM domain protein Aveugle is required for Raf activation in the Drosophila EGF receptor signaling pathway.
|
| |
Genes Dev, 20,
795-806.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Aviv,
Z.Lin,
G.Ben-Ari,
C.A.Smibert,
and
F.Sicheri
(2006).
Sequence-specific recognition of RNA hairpins by the SAM domain of Vts1p.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol, 13,
168-176.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Inoue,
K.Terada,
A.Furukawa,
C.Koike,
Y.Tamaki,
M.Araie,
and
T.Furukawa
(2006).
Cloning and characterization of mr-s, a novel SAM domain protein, predominantly expressed in retinal photoreceptor cells.
|
| |
BMC Dev Biol, 6,
15.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Kim,
M.R.Sawaya,
D.Cascio,
W.Kim,
and
J.U.Bowie
(2005).
Structural organization of a Sex-comb-on-midleg/polyhomeotic copolymer.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 280,
27769-27775.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.W.Voncken,
H.Niessen,
B.Neufeld,
U.Rennefahrt,
V.Dahlmans,
N.Kubben,
B.Holzer,
S.Ludwig,
and
U.R.Rapp
(2005).
MAPKAP kinase 3pK phosphorylates and regulates chromatin association of the polycomb group protein Bmi1.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 280,
5178-5187.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Isono,
Y.Fujimura,
J.Shinga,
M.Yamaki,
J.O-Wang,
Y.Takihara,
Y.Murahashi,
Y.Takada,
Y.Mizutani-Koseki,
and
H.Koseki
(2005).
Mammalian polyhomeotic homologues Phc2 and Phc1 act in synergy to mediate polycomb repression of Hox genes.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol, 25,
6694-6706.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Bhattacharjya,
P.Xu,
M.Chakrapani,
L.Johnston,
and
F.Ni
(2005).
Polymerization of the SAM domain of MAPKKK Ste11 from the budding yeast: implications for efficient signaling through the MAPK cascades.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 14,
828-835.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Peterson,
D.R.Mallin,
N.J.Francis,
C.S.Ketel,
J.Stamm,
R.K.Voeller,
R.E.Kingston,
and
J.A.Simon
(2004).
Requirement for sex comb on midleg protein interactions in Drosophila polycomb group repression.
|
| |
Genetics, 167,
1225-1239.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.E.Tognon,
C.D.Mackereth,
A.M.Somasiri,
L.P.McIntosh,
and
P.H.Sorensen
(2004).
Mutations in the SAM domain of the ETV6-NTRK3 chimeric tyrosine kinase block polymerization and transformation activity.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol, 24,
4636-4650.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Qiao,
H.Song,
C.A.Kim,
M.R.Sawaya,
J.B.Hunter,
M.Gingery,
I.Rebay,
A.J.Courey,
and
J.U.Bowie
(2004).
Derepression by depolymerization; structural insights into the regulation of Yan by Mae.
|
| |
Cell, 118,
163-173.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Zhang,
G.A.Smolen,
R.Palmer,
A.Christoforou,
S.van den Heuvel,
and
D.A.Haber
(2004).
SUMO modification is required for in vivo Hox gene regulation by the Caenorhabditis elegans Polycomb group protein SOP-2.
|
| |
Nat Genet, 36,
507-511.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Y.Ali,
and
W.Bender
(2004).
Cross-regulation among the polycomb group genes in Drosophila melanogaster.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol, 24,
7737-7747.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Ringrose,
and
R.Paro
(2004).
Epigenetic regulation of cellular memory by the Polycomb and Trithorax group proteins.
|
| |
Annu Rev Genet, 38,
413-443.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.De Rycker,
and
C.M.Price
(2004).
Tankyrase polymerization is controlled by its sterile alpha motif and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase domains.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol, 24,
9802-9812.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Lavigne,
N.J.Francis,
I.F.King,
and
R.E.Kingston
(2004).
Propagation of silencing; recruitment and repression of naive chromatin in trans by polycomb repressed chromatin.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 13,
415-425.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Grimshaw,
H.R.Mott,
K.M.Stott,
P.R.Nielsen,
K.A.Evetts,
L.J.Hopkins,
D.Nietlispach,
and
D.Owen
(2004).
Structure of the sterile alpha motif (SAM) domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway-modulating protein STE50 and analysis of its interaction with the STE11 SAM.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 279,
2192-2201.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Astoul,
A.D.Laurence,
N.Totty,
S.Beer,
D.R.Alexander,
and
D.A.Cantrell
(2003).
Approaches to define antigen receptor-induced serine kinase signal transduction pathways.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 278,
9267-9275.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.B.Green,
C.D.Gardner,
R.P.Wharton,
and
A.K.Aggarwal
(2003).
RNA recognition via the SAM domain of Smaug.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 11,
1537-1548.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Boccuni,
D.MacGrogan,
J.M.Scandura,
and
S.D.Nimer
(2003).
The human L(3)MBT polycomb group protein is a transcriptional repressor and interacts physically and functionally with TEL (ETV6).
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 278,
15412-15420.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.L.Rich,
and
D.G.Myszka
(2003).
A survey of the year 2002 commercial optical biosensor literature.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit, 16,
351-382.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Aviv,
Z.Lin,
S.Lau,
L.M.Rendl,
F.Sicheri,
and
C.A.Smibert
(2003).
The RNA-binding SAM domain of Smaug defines a new family of post-transcriptional regulators.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol, 10,
614-621.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.M.Hall
(2003).
SAM breaks its stereotype.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol, 10,
677-679.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Pawson,
and
P.Nash
(2003).
Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains.
|
| |
Science, 300,
445-452.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.A.Dean,
A.K.Aggarwal,
and
R.P.Wharton
(2002).
Translational repressors in Drosophila.
|
| |
Trends Genet, 18,
572-577.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Ramachander,
C.A.Kim,
M.L.Phillips,
C.D.Mackereth,
C.D.Thanos,
L.P.McIntosh,
and
J.U.Bowie
(2002).
Oligomerization-dependent association of the SAM domains from Schizosaccharomyces pombe Byr2 and Ste4.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 277,
39585-39593.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|