spacer
spacer
Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands links
Hormone/growth factor PDB id
1jnd
Jmol
Contents
Protein chain
400 a.a. *
Ligands
NAG-NAG-BMA-MAN
Waters ×700
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
1jnd
Name: Hormone/growth factor
Title: Crystal structure of imaginal disc growth factor-2
Structure: Imaginal disc growth factor-2. Chain: a
Source: Drosophila melanogaster. Fruit fly. Organism_taxid: 7227
Resolution:
1.30Å     R-factor:   0.176     R-free:   0.202
Authors: P.F.Varela,A.S.Llera,R.A.Mariuzza,J.Tormo
Key ref:
P.F.Varela et al. (2002). Crystal structure of imaginal disc growth factor-2. A member of a new family of growth-promoting glycoproteins from Drosophila melanogaster. J Biol Chem, 277, 13229-13236. PubMed id: 11821393 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110502200
Date:
23-Jul-01     Release date:   01-May-02    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
Q9V3D4  (IDGF2_DROME) -  Chitinase-like protein Idgf2
Seq:
Struc:
440 a.a.
400 a.a.*
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 1 residue position (black cross)

 Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation 
  GO annot!
  Cellular component     extracellular region   1 term 
  Biological process     multicellular organismal development   4 terms 
  Biochemical function     catalytic activity     6 terms  

 

 
DOI no: 10.1074/jbc.M110502200 J Biol Chem 277:13229-13236 (2002)
PubMed id: 11821393  
 
 
Crystal structure of imaginal disc growth factor-2. A member of a new family of growth-promoting glycoproteins from Drosophila melanogaster.
P.F.Varela, A.S.Llera, R.A.Mariuzza, J.Tormo.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Imaginal disc growth factor-2 (IDGF-2) is a member of a recently described family of Drosophila melanogaster-soluble polypeptide growth factors that promote cell proliferation in imaginal discs. Although their precise mode of action has not been established, IDGFs cooperate with insulin in stimulating the growth of imaginal disc cells. We report the crystal structure of IDGF-2 at 1.3-A resolution. The structure shows the classical (betaalpha)(8) barrel-fold of family 18 glycosyl hydrolases, with an insertion of an alpha + beta domain similar to that of Serratia marcescens chitinases A and B. However, amino acid substitutions in the consensus catalytic sequence of chitinases give IDGF-2 a less negatively charged environment in its putative ligand-binding site and preclude the nucleophilic attack mechanism of chitin hydrolysis. Particularly important is the replacement of Glu by Gln at position 132, which has been shown to abolish enzymatic activity in chitinases. Nevertheless, a modest conservation of residues that participate in oligosaccharide recognition suggests that IDGF-2 could bind carbohydrates, assuming several conformational changes to open the partially occluded binding site. Thus, IDGFs may have evolved from chitinases to acquire new functions as growth factors, interacting with cell surface glycoproteins implicated in growth-promoting processes, such as the Drosophila insulin receptor.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Comparison of the binding sites of IDGF-2, a chitinase, and a chitinase-like protein. A, putative ligand-binding site of IDGF-2. B, same view of the active site of chitinase A (17). C, saccharide binding site of Ym1 (39). Residues conserved in all three structures are green; those not conserved in any of the structures are yellow. Residues conserved between IDGF-2 and chitinase A are lilac, residues conserved between IDGF-2 and Ym1 are cyan, and residues conserved between chitinase A and Ym1 are orange.
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. Comparative surface analysis of the binding sites of IDGF-2 and chitinase A. Electrostatic surface potentials for IDGF-2 (A) and chitinase A (B) (17) were calculated using GRASP (24). Solvent-accessible surfaces are colored according to electrostatic potential, with positively charged residues in blue and negatively charged residues in red. The positions of residues Gln-132 of IDGF-2 (A) and the catalytic Glu-315 of chitinase A (B) are marked by asterisks.
 
  The above figures are reprinted by permission from the ASBMB: J Biol Chem (2002, 277, 13229-13236) copyright 2002.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
20084296 H.Li, and L.H.Greene (2010).
Sequence and structural analysis of the chitinase insertion domain reveals two conserved motifs involved in chitin-binding.
  PLoS One, 5, e8654.  
19479736 Y.Li, K.Chen, Q.Yao, J.Li, Y.Wang, H.Liu, C.Zhang, and G.Huang (2009).
The effect of calorie restriction on growth and development in silkworm, Bombyx mori.
  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol, 71, 159-172.  
18342250 Q.Zhu, Y.Arakane, D.Banerjee, R.W.Beeman, K.J.Kramer, and S.Muthukrishnan (2008).
Domain organization and phylogenetic analysis of the chitinase-like family of proteins in three species of insects.
  Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 38, 452-466.  
18342251 Q.Zhu, Y.Arakane, R.W.Beeman, K.J.Kramer, and S.Muthukrishnan (2008).
Characterization of recombinant chitinase-like proteins of Drosophila melanogaster and Tribolium castaneum.
  Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 38, 467-477.  
17594485 J.D.Funkhouser, and N.N.Aronson (2007).
Chitinase family GH18: evolutionary insights from the genomic history of a diverse protein family.
  BMC Evol Biol, 7, 96.  
17543889 Zaheer-ul-Haq, P.Dalal, N.N.Aronson, and J.D.Madura (2007).
Family 18 chitolectins: comparison of MGP40 and HUMGP39.
  Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 359, 221-226.  
15271211 L.Shi, and S.M.Paskewitz (2004).
Identification and molecular characterization of two immune-responsive chitinase-like proteins from Anopheles gambiae.
  Insect Mol Biol, 13, 387-398.  
15361235 R.M.Maizels, A.Balic, N.Gomez-Escobar, M.Nair, M.D.Taylor, and J.E.Allen (2004).
Helminth parasites--masters of regulation.
  Immunol Rev, 201, 89.  
  12242232 M.Zurovcová, and F.J.Ayala (2002).
Polymorphism patterns in two tightly linked developmental genes, Idgf1 and Idgf3, of Drosophila melanogaster.
  Genetics, 162, 177-188.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time.