 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Cellular component
|
nucleus
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
DNA binding
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
2:609-627
(1994)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The solution structure and dynamics of the DNA-binding domain of HMG-D from Drosophila melanogaster.
|
|
D.N.Jones,
M.A.Searles,
G.L.Shaw,
M.E.Churchill,
S.S.Ner,
J.Keeler,
A.A.Travers,
D.Neuhaus.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
BACKGROUND: The HMG-box is a conserved DNA-binding motif that has been
identified in many high mobility group (HMG) proteins. HMG-D is a non-histone
chromosomal protein from Drosophila melanogaster that is closely related to the
mammalian HMG-box proteins HMG-1 and HMG-2. Previous structures determined for
an HMG-box domain from rat and hamster exhibit the same global topology, but
differ significantly in detail. It has been suggested that these differences may
arise from hinge motions which allow the protein to adapt to the shape of its
target DNA. RESULTS: We present the solution structure of HMG-D determined by
NMR spectroscopy to an overall precision of 0.85 A root mean squared deviation
(rmsd) for the backbone atoms. The protein consists of an extended
amino-terminal region and three alpha-helices that fold into a characteristic
'L' shape. The central core region of the molecule is highly stable and
maintains an angle of approximately 80 degrees between the axes of helices 2 and
3. The backbone dynamics determined from 15N NMR relaxation measurements show a
high correlation with the mean residue rmsd determined from the calculated
structures. CONCLUSIONS: The structure determined for the HMG-box motif from
HMG-D is essentially identical to the structure determined for the B-domain of
mammalian HMG-1. Since these proteins have significantly different sequences our
results indicate that the global fold and the mode of interaction with DNA are
also likely to be conserved in all eukaryotes.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Comparison of the sequences of HMG-box motifs from
HMG-D and mammalian HMG-1 and HMG-2. Residues that are conserved
in all sequences shown are highlighted in red. Additional
residues which are conserved between HMG-D and the B-domain of
HMG-1 are highlighted in green. The sequences are numbered
according to the encoded HMG-D protein. Figure 1. Comparison
of the sequences of HMG-box motifs from HMG-D and mammalian
HMG-1 and HMG-2. Residues that are conserved in all sequences
shown are highlighted in red. Additional residues which are
conserved between HMG-D and the B-domain of HMG-1 are
highlighted in green. The sequences are numbered according to
the encoded HMG-D protein.
|
 |
Figure 10.
Figure 10. Comparison of the HMG-box domain from HMG-D (red)
and the B-domain of rat HMG-1 (yellow) [12]. The structures are
superimposed on the backbone N, Cα and C′ atoms corresponding
to residues 12–27, 34–44 and 50–59 of HMG-D. Figure
10. Comparison of the HMG-box domain from HMG-D (red) and the
B-domain of rat HMG-1 (yellow) [[3]12]. The structures are
superimposed on the backbone N, Cα and C′ atoms corresponding
to residues 12–27, 34–44 and 50–59 of HMG-D.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(1994,
2,
609-627)
copyright 1994.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
T.A.Gangelhoff,
P.S.Mungalachetty,
J.C.Nix,
and
M.E.Churchill
(2009).
Structural analysis and DNA binding of the HMG domains of the human mitochondrial transcription factor A.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 37,
3153-3164.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.C.Roemer,
J.Adelman,
M.E.Churchill,
and
D.P.Edwards
(2008).
Mechanism of high-mobility group protein B enhancement of progesterone receptor sequence-specific DNA binding.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 36,
3655-3666.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Kasai,
Y.Tsunaka,
I.Ohki,
S.Hirose,
K.Morikawa,
and
S.Tate
(2005).
Solution structure of the HMG-box domain in the SSRP1 subunit of FACT.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR, 32,
83-88.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Kamau,
K.T.Bauerle,
and
A.Grove
(2004).
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group box protein HMO1 contains two functional DNA binding domains.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 279,
55234-55240.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.W.Friddle,
J.E.Klare,
S.S.Martin,
M.Corzett,
R.Balhorn,
E.P.Baldwin,
R.J.Baskin,
and
A.Noy
(2004).
Mechanism of DNA compaction by yeast mitochondrial protein Abf2p.
|
| |
Biophys J, 86,
1632-1639.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Matsutani
(2004).
Similarities in transcription factor IIIC subunits that bind to the posterior regions of internal promoters for RNA polymerase III.
|
| |
BMC Evol Biol, 4,
26.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Ragab,
and
A.Travers
(2003).
HMG-D and histone H1 alter the local accessibility of nucleosomal DNA.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 31,
7083-7089.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Klass,
F.V.Murphy,
S.Fouts,
M.Serenil,
A.Changela,
J.Siple,
and
M.E.Churchill
(2003).
The role of intercalating residues in chromosomal high-mobility-group protein DNA binding, bending and specificity.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 31,
2852-2864.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Kanaya,
N.Nakajima,
and
K.Okada
(2002).
Non-sequence-specific DNA binding by the FILAMENTOUS FLOWER protein from Arabidopsis thaliana is reduced by EDTA.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 277,
11957-11964.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.O.Thomas,
and
A.A.Travers
(2001).
HMG1 and 2, and related 'architectural' DNA-binding proteins.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci, 26,
167-174.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Cerdan,
D.Payet,
J.C.Yang,
A.A.Travers,
and
D.Neuhaus
(2001).
HMG-D complexed to a bulge DNA: an NMR model.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 10,
504-518.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Travers
(2000).
Recognition of distorted DNA structures by HMG domains.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol, 10,
102-109.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.V.Murphy,
and
M.E.Churchill
(2000).
Nonsequence-specific DNA recognition: a structural perspective.
|
| |
Structure, 8,
R83-R89.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.M.Benevides,
G.Chan,
X.J.Lu,
W.K.Olson,
M.A.Weiss,
and
G.J.Thomas
(2000).
Protein-directed DNA structure. I. Raman spectroscopy of a high-mobility-group box with application to human sex reversal.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 39,
537-547.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.K.Dow,
D.N.Jones,
S.A.Wolfe,
G.L.Verdine,
and
M.E.Churchill
(2000).
Structural studies of the high mobility group globular domain and basic tail of HMG-D bound to disulfide cross-linked DNA.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 39,
9725-9736.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.H.Allain,
Y.M.Yen,
J.E.Masse,
P.Schultze,
T.Dieckmann,
R.C.Johnson,
and
J.Feigon
(1999).
Solution structure of the HMG protein NHP6A and its interaction with DNA reveals the structural determinants for non-sequence-specific binding.
|
| |
EMBO J, 18,
2563-2579.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
F.V.Murphy,
J.V.Sehy,
L.K.Dow,
Y.G.Gao,
and
M.E.Churchill
(1999).
Co-crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of the high mobility group domain of HMG-D bound to DNA.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 55,
1594-1597.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.V.Murphy,
R.M.Sweet,
and
M.E.Churchill
(1999).
The structure of a chromosomal high mobility group protein-DNA complex reveals sequence-neutral mechanisms important for non-sequence-specific DNA recognition.
|
| |
EMBO J, 18,
6610-6618.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.R.Wiśniewski,
N.M.Krohn,
E.Heyduk,
K.D.Grasser,
and
T.Heyduk
(1999).
HMG1 proteins from evolutionary distant organisms distort B-DNA conformation in similar way.
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta, 1447,
25-34.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Tang,
and
L.Nilsson
(1999).
Effect of G40R mutation on the binding of human SRY protein to DNA: a molecular dynamics view.
|
| |
Proteins, 35,
101-113.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Balaeff,
M.E.Churchill,
and
K.Schulten
(1998).
Structure prediction of a complex between the chromosomal protein HMG-D and DNA.
|
| |
Proteins, 30,
113-135.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Ritt,
R.Grimm,
S.Fernandez,
J.C.Alonso,
and
K.D.Grasser
(1998).
Basic and acidic regions flanking the HMG domain of maize HMGa modulate the interactions with DNA and the self-association of the protein.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 37,
2673-2681.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.R.P-ohler,
D.G.Norman,
J.Bramham,
M.E.Bianchi,
and
D.M.Lilley
(1998).
HMG box proteins bind to four-way DNA junctions in their open conformation.
|
| |
EMBO J, 17,
817-826.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Stros
(1998).
DNA bending by the chromosomal protein HMG1 and its high mobility group box domains. Effect of flanking sequences.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 273,
10355-10361.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.L.Benzinger,
D.T.Braddock,
S.R.Dominguez,
T.S.Burkoth,
H.Miller-Auer,
R.M.Subramanian,
G.M.Fless,
D.N.Jones,
D.G.Lynn,
and
S.C.Meredith
(1998).
Structure-function relationships in side chain lactam cross-linked peptide models of a conserved N-terminal domain of apolipoprotein E.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 37,
13222-13229.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.M.Yen,
B.Wong,
and
R.C.Johnson
(1998).
Determinants of DNA binding and bending by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group protein NHP6A that are important for its biological activities. Role of the unique N terminus and putative intercalating methionine.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 273,
4424-4435.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Tang,
and
L.Nilsson
(1998).
Interaction of human SRY protein with DNA: a molecular dynamics study.
|
| |
Proteins, 31,
417-433.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Stemmer,
C.Ritt,
G.L.Igloi,
R.Grimm,
and
K.D.Grasser
(1997).
Variability in Arabidopsis thaliana chromosomal high-mobility-group-1-like proteins.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem, 250,
646-652.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.R.Wísniewski,
K.Hessler,
P.Claus,
and
K.Zechel
(1997).
Structural and functional consequences of mutations within the hydrophobic cores of the HMG1-box domain of the Chironomus high-mobility-group protein 1a.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem, 243,
151-159.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.U.Dunham,
and
S.J.Lippard
(1997).
DNA sequence context and protein composition modulate HMG-domain protein recognition of cisplatin-modified DNA.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 36,
11428-11436.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.E.Pearson,
H.Zorbas,
G.B.Price,
and
M.Zannis-Hadjopoulos
(1996).
Inverted repeats, stem-loops, and cruciforms: significance for initiation of DNA replication.
|
| |
J Cell Biochem, 63,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.D.Grasser,
R.Grimm,
and
C.Ritt
(1996).
Maize chromosomal HMGc. Two closely related structure-specific DNA-binding proteins specify a second type of plant high mobility group box protein.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 271,
32900-32906.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Lnenicek-Allen,
C.M.Read,
and
C.Crane-Robinson
(1996).
The DNA bend angle and binding affinity of an HMG box increased by the presence of short terminal arms.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 24,
1047-1051.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.A.Travers
(1995).
Reading the minor groove.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol, 2,
615-618.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.D.Baxevanis,
and
D.Landsman
(1995).
The HMG-1 box protein family: classification and functional relationships.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 23,
1604-1613.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.D.Baxevanis,
S.H.Bryant,
and
D.Landsman
(1995).
Homology model building of the HMG-1 box structural domain.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 23,
1019-1029.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.M.Gronenborn,
and
G.M.Clore
(1995).
Structures of protein complexes by multidimensional heteronuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
|
| |
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol, 30,
351-385.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Bramham,
and
D.G.Norman
(1995).
hSRY: molecular gender bender.
|
| |
Structure, 3,
631-633.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.E.Churchill,
D.N.Jones,
T.Glaser,
H.Hefner,
M.A.Searles,
and
A.A.Travers
(1995).
HMG-D is an architecture-specific protein that preferentially binds to DNA containing the dinucleotide TG.
|
| |
EMBO J, 14,
1264-1275.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Grosschedl
(1995).
Higher-order nucleoprotein complexes in transcription: analogies with site-specific recombination.
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol, 7,
362-370.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.H.Teo,
K.D.Grasser,
C.H.Hardman,
R.W.Broadhurst,
E.D.Laue,
and
J.O.Thomas
(1995).
Two mutations in the HMG-box with very different structural consequences provide insights into the nature of binding to four-way junction DNA.
|
| |
EMBO J, 14,
3844-3853.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.H.Teo,
K.D.Grasser,
and
J.O.Thomas
(1995).
Differences in the DNA-binding properties of the HMG-box domains of HMG1 and the sex-determining factor SRY.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem, 230,
943-950.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|