 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Hydrolase
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
The catalytic module of cel7d from phanerochaete chrysosporium as a chiral selector: structural studies of its complex with the b-blocker (r)-propranolol
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Exoglucanase i. Chain: x. Fragment: catalytic module, residues 19-449. Synonym: 1,4-beta-cellobiohydrolase, cellulase, exocellobiohydrolase i, cbh58, cbh1, cbh i, cbh1.2 exocellulase. Other_details: beta-blocker (r)-propranolol
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Organism_taxid: 5306. Strain: k3. Atcc: 32629. Other_details: extracellular protein obtained from the fungus phanerochaete chrysosporium
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
1.52Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.171
|
R-free:
|
0.219
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
I.G.Munoz,S.L.Mowbray,J.Stahlberg
|
Key ref:
|
 |
I.G.Muñoz
et al.
(2003).
The catalytic module of Cel7D from Phanerochaete chrysosporium as a chiral selector: structural studies of its complex with the beta blocker (R)-propranolol.
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
59,
637-643.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
03-Oct-02
|
Release date:
|
03-Apr-03
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q7LHI2
(Q7LHI2_PHACH) -
Cellulase
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
540 a.a.
431 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 1 residue position (black
cross)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.3.2.1.91
- Cellulose 1,4-beta-cellobiosidase (non-reducing end).
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
Hydrolysis of 1,4-beta-D-glucosidic linkages in cellulose and cellotetraose, releasing cellobiose from the non-reducing ends of the chains.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
carbohydrate metabolic process
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
hydrolase activity, hydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr
59:637-643
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The catalytic module of Cel7D from Phanerochaete chrysosporium as a chiral selector: structural studies of its complex with the beta blocker (R)-propranolol.
|
|
I.G.Muñoz,
S.L.Mowbray,
J.Ståhlberg.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Previous investigations have shown that the major cellobiohydrolase of
Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Cel7D (CBH 58), can be used to separate the
enantiomers of a number of drugs, including adrenergic beta blockers such as
propranolol. The structural basis of this enantioselectivity is explored here. A
1.5 A X-ray structure of the catalytic domain of Cel7D in complex with
(R)-propranolol showed the ligand bound at the active site in glucosyl-binding
subsites -1/+1. The catalytic residue Glu207 makes a strong charge-charge
interaction with the secondary amine of (R)-propranolol; this is supported by a
second interaction of the amine with the nearby Asp209. The aromatic naphthyl
group stacks onto the indole ring of Trp373 (normally the glucosyl-binding
platform of subsite +1). Other factors also contribute to good complementarity
between the ligand and the substrate-binding cleft of the enzyme. Comparison
with the previous structure of a related cellulase, Cel7A from Trichoderma
reesei, in complex with (S)-propranolol strongly suggests that these enzymes
will bind the (S)-enantiomer in a very similar manner, distinct from their mode
of binding to (R)-propranolol. Tighter binding of both enzymes to the
(S)-enantiomer is largely explained by two additional hydrogen-bonding
interactions with its hydroxyl group. The distinct preference for the
(R)-enantiomer is probably a consequence of structural differences near the
naphthyl group of the ligand.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3 Similarities and differences in ligand docking.
(S)-propranolol as bound to Tr_Cel7A (green C atoms in ligand
and protein) is superimposed on the complex of Pc_Cel7D and
(R)-propranolol (C atoms are light blue in ligand and gold in
protein) and shown in divergent stereo. (a) View from `above'
the catalytic cleft showing that the active sites are
practically identical around most of the ligand. The residue
numbers are for Pc_Cel7D. The isopropyl moieties, pointing
downwards in this view, and the secondary amino groups are in
similar positions. The rest of the amino-alcohol chains have
different conformations and the naphthyl groups are shifted. (b)
View from the end of the cleft along the bottom of the binding
site towards the catalytic residues. Tr_Cel7A (green labels) has
a loop (top left) that extends above the active site and which,
together with Tyr371 on the opposing loop, encloses the naphthyl
moiety of the ligand. In Pc_Cel7D (brown labels) the
corresponding loop is shorter and leaves one face of the upper
part of the naphthyl exposed to solvent. In both complexes there
is room for water molecules between the ligand and the `bottom'
of the binding cleft; some from the Pc_Cel7D-(R)-propranolol
complex are shown as red spheres. The protein structures were
aligned initially by matching residues 207-212 of Pc_Cel7D to
212-217 of Tr_Cel7A; the alignment was improved using a 1.0 Å
cutoff. This approach results in an r.m.s. difference of 0.5 Å
for 329 C^ atoms.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figure is
reprinted
by permission from the IUCr:
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr
(2003,
59,
637-643)
copyright 2003.
|
|
| |
Figure was
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
L.Hildén,
and
G.Johansson
(2004).
Recent developments on cellulases and carbohydrate-binding modules with cellulose affinity.
|
| |
Biotechnol Lett, 26,
1683-1693.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
|