spacer
spacer
Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands metals Protein-protein interface(s) links
Chaperone PDB id
1g31
Jmol
Contents
Protein chains
(+ 1 more) 107 a.a. *
Ligands
PO4 ×19
Metals
__K ×11
Waters ×469
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
1g31
Name: Chaperone
Title: Gp31 co-chaperonin from bacteriophage t4
Structure: Gp31. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f, g. Engineered: yes
Source: Enterobacteria phage t4. Organism_taxid: 10665. Organ: brain. Cellular_location: cytoplasm. Gene: 31. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
Biol. unit: Heptamer (from PDB file)
Resolution:
2.30Å     R-factor:   0.225     R-free:   0.254
Authors: J.F.Hunt,S.M.Van Der Vies,L.Henry,J.Deisenhofer
Key ref:
J.F.Hunt et al. (1997). Structural adaptations in the specialized bacteriophage T4 co-chaperonin Gp31 expand the size of the Anfinsen cage. Cell, 90, 361-371. PubMed id: 9244309 DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80343-8
Date:
27-Mar-98     Release date:   26-Aug-98    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chains
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P17313  (VG31_BPT4) -  Capsid assembly protein Gp31
Seq:
Struc:
111 a.a.
107 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain

 Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation 
  GO annot!
  Cellular component     cytoplasm   1 term 
  Biological process     viral capsid assembly   2 terms 

 

 
DOI no: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80343-8 Cell 90:361-371 (1997)
PubMed id: 9244309  
 
 
Structural adaptations in the specialized bacteriophage T4 co-chaperonin Gp31 expand the size of the Anfinsen cage.
J.F.Hunt, S.M.van der Vies, L.Henry, J.Deisenhofer.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
The Gp31 protein from bacteriophage T4 functionally substitutes for the bacterial co-chaperonin GroES in assisted protein folding reactions both in vitro and in vivo. But Gp31 is required for the folding and/or assembly of the T4 major capsid protein Gp23, and this requirement cannot be satisfied by GroES. The 2.3 A crystal structure of Gp31 shows that its tertiary and quaternary structures are similar to those of GroES despite the existence of only 14% sequence identity between the two proteins. However, Gp31 shows a series of structural adaptations which will increase the size and the hydrophilicity of the "Anfinsen cage," the enclosed cavity within the GroEL/GroES complex that is the location of the chaperonin-assisted protein folding reaction.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Electron Density Maps(A) Electron density map ([29]) obtained by iterative solvent flattening (without NCS averaging) starting with the initial molecular replacement phases. The backbone trace of the molecular replacement search model is shown in yellow. There is a single Gp31 heptamer in the crystallographic asymmetric unit.(B) The SIGMA-A ([49]) weighted (2F[o]-F[c]) map from the refined model. The phosphate zipper holding together the mobile loop cage is shown in a view looking down the 7-fold symmetry axis. The crystallographic 2-fold axis runs parallel to the plane of the page. The electron density for the phosphate anions is highlighted in red.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. The Structure of Gp31(A) Crystallographically observed secondary structure in Gp31 and structural alignment of Gp31 with GroES. Red indicates β-strands, blue indicates α-helices, and green indicates 3[10]-helices. The Greek letters indicate β-turn classification ([66]). The shaded boxes delineate the 58 residues of the shared structural core in Gp31 and GroES. The underlined sequences represent the dynamically disordered residues of the mobile loop as observed by NMR ( [36 and 37]). The residues in Gp31 making van der Waals contacts in the hydrophobic core of the β-barrel are indicated by asterisks, and the location of the turn in the GroEL-bound conformation of the mobile loop is indicated by “t” ( [37]). Vertical boxes indicate positions where identical residues occur in the β-barrel domain of quinoneoxidoreductase which shares the same fold as Gp31/GroES ([44]). The numbers at the bottom refer to the sequence of Gp31.(B) Stereo pair ([34 and 43]) showing the Cα trace of the Gp31 and GroES monomers after least-squares alignment of the structural core. Gp31 is shown in light green, except for the mobile loop which is shown in yellow, and GroES is shown in dark purple. The side-chain of Gln75 is shown for Gp31, while the side-chain of Tyr71 is shown for GroES.(C) Two orthogonal views of the Gp31 and GroES heptamers (with color coding as in [B]); the single well-ordered copy of the mobile loop observed in the crystal structure GroES heptamer is also shown in yellow.
 
  The above figures are reprinted by permission from Cell Press: Cell (1997, 90, 361-371) copyright 1997.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
19031045 C.Weiss, A.Bonshtien, O.Farchi-Pisanty, A.Vitlin, and A.Azem (2009).
Cpn20: Siamese twins of the chaperonin world.
  Plant Mol Biol, 69, 227-238.  
19122642 D.K.Clare, P.J.Bakkes, H.van Heerikhuizen, S.M.van der Vies, and H.R.Saibil (2009).
Chaperonin complex with a newly folded protein encapsulated in the folding chamber.
  Nature, 457, 107-110.  
17489689 A.L.Horwich, W.A.Fenton, E.Chapman, and G.W.Farr (2007).
Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism.
  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 23, 115-145.  
16537402 G.Stan, B.R.Brooks, G.H.Lorimer, and D.Thirumalai (2006).
Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103, 4433-4438.  
16751100 Y.C.Tang, H.C.Chang, A.Roeben, D.Wischnewski, N.Wischnewski, M.J.Kerner, F.U.Hartl, and M.Hayer-Hartl (2006).
Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein.
  Cell, 125, 903-914.  
15613396 B.Pierce, W.Tong, and Z.Weng (2005).
M-ZDOCK: a grid-based approach for Cn symmetric multimer docking.
  Bioinformatics, 21, 1472-1478.  
15846365 E.van Duijn, P.J.Bakkes, R.M.Heeren, R.H.van den Heuvel, H.van Heerikhuizen, S.M.van der Vies, and A.J.Heck (2005).
Monitoring macromolecular complexes involved in the chaperonin-assisted protein folding cycle by mass spectrometry.
  Nat Methods, 2, 371-376.  
16396595 F.Arisaka (2005).
Assembly and infection process of bacteriophage T4.
  Chaos, 15, 047502.  
16184006 M.Morange (2005).
What history tells us II. The discovery of chaperone function.
  J Biosci, 30, 461-464.  
15558581 N.Numoto, A.Kita, and K.Miki (2005).
Crystal structure of the Co-chaperonin Cpn10 from Thermus thermophilus HB8.
  Proteins, 58, 498-500.
PDB code: 1wnr
15919824 P.J.Bakkes, B.W.Faber, H.van Heerikhuizen, and S.M.van der Vies (2005).
The T4-encoded cochaperonin, gp31, has unique properties that explain its requirement for the folding of the T4 major capsid protein.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 102, 8144-8149.  
15238634 F.Shewmaker, M.J.Kerner, M.Hayer-Hartl, G.Klein, C.Georgopoulos, and S.J.Landry (2004).
A mobile loop order-disorder transition modulates the speed of chaperonin cycling.
  Protein Sci, 13, 2139-2148.  
15356869 G.Fossati, P.Cremonesi, G.Izzo, E.Rizzi, G.Sandrone, S.Harding, N.Errington, C.Walters, B.Henderson, M.M.Roberts, A.R.Coates, and P.Mascagni (2004).
The Mycobacterium tuberculosis chaperonin 10 monomer exhibits structural plasticity.
  Biopolymers, 75, 148-162.  
15159565 R.H.Lilien, C.Bailey-Kellogg, A.C.Anderson, and B.R.Donald (2004).
A subgroup algorithm to identify cross-rotation peaks consistent with non-crystallographic symmetry.
  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 60, 1057-1067.  
15627372 V.V.Mesyanzhinov, P.G.Leiman, V.A.Kostyuchenko, L.P.Kurochkina, K.A.Miroshnikov, N.N.Sykilinda, and M.M.Shneider (2004).
Molecular architecture of bacteriophage T4.
  Biochemistry (Mosc), 69, 1190-1202.  
12626685 E.S.Miller, E.Kutter, G.Mosig, F.Arisaka, T.Kunisawa, and W.Rüger (2003).
Bacteriophage T4 genome.
  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 67, 86.  
14525625 J.J.Guidry, F.Shewmaker, K.Maskos, S.Landry, and P.Wittung-Stafshede (2003).
Probing the interface in a human co-chaperonin heptamer: residues disrupting oligomeric unfolded state identified.
  BMC Biochem, 4, 14.  
11807250 B.Taneja, and S.C.Mande (2002).
Structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis chaperonin-10 at 3.5 A resolution.
  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 58, 260-266.  
12189177 F.Keppel, M.Rychner, and C.Georgopoulos (2002).
Bacteriophage-encoded cochaperonins can substitute for Escherichia coli's essential GroES protein.
  EMBO Rep, 3, 893-898.  
12507429 J.D.Wang, C.Herman, K.A.Tipton, C.A.Gross, and J.S.Weissman (2002).
Directed evolution of substrate-optimized GroEL/S chaperonins.
  Cell, 111, 1027-1039.  
  11404317 G.Klein, and C.Georgopoulos (2001).
Identification of important amino acid residues that modulate binding of Escherichia coli GroEL to its various cochaperones.
  Genetics, 158, 507-517.  
11092834 D.Ang, F.Keppel, G.Klein, A.Richardson, and C.Georgopoulos (2000).
Genetic analysis of bacteriophage-encoded cochaperonins.
  Annu Rev Genet, 34, 439-456.  
  10430575 A.Richardson, and C.Georgopoulos (1999).
Genetic analysis of the bacteriophage T4-encoded cochaperonin Gp31.
  Genetics, 152, 1449-1457.  
9867810 A.Richardson, S.M.van der Vies, F.Keppel, A.Taher, S.J.Landry, and C.Georgopoulos (1999).
Compensatory changes in GroEL/Gp31 affinity as a mechanism for allele-specific genetic interaction.
  J Biol Chem, 274, 52-58.  
10409682 C.Sakikawa, H.Taguchi, Y.Makino, and M.Yoshida (1999).
On the maximum size of proteins to stay and fold in the cavity of GroEL underneath GroES.
  J Biol Chem, 274, 21251-21256.  
10542069 K.Mukherjee, H.Nagai, N.Shimamoto, and D.Chatterji (1999).
GroEL is involved in activation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase devoid of the omega subunit in vivo.
  Eur J Biochem, 266, 228-235.  
10047583 L.Liljas (1999).
Virus assembly.
  Curr Opin Struct Biol, 9, 129-134.  
10089332 M.M.Roberts, A.R.Coker, G.Fossati, P.Mascagni, A.R.Coates, and S.P.Wood (1999).
Crystallization, x-ray diffraction and preliminary structure analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis chaperonin 10.
  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 55, 910-914.  
9519301 A.Horovitz (1998).
Structural aspects of GroEL function.
  Curr Opin Struct Biol, 8, 93.  
9584617 A.Richardson, S.J.Landry, and C.Georgopoulos (1998).
The ins and outs of a molecular chaperone machine.
  Trends Biochem Sci, 23, 138-143.  
9476895 B.Bukau, and A.L.Horwich (1998).
The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines.
  Cell, 92, 351-366.  
  10066478 C.Herman, and R.D'Ari (1998).
Proteolysis and chaperones: the destruction/reconstruction dilemma.
  Curr Opin Microbiol, 1, 204-209.  
9852065 J.D.Andreadis, and L.W.Black (1998).
Substrate mutations that bypass a specific Cpn10 chaperonin requirement for protein folding.
  J Biol Chem, 273, 34075-34086.  
9759498 P.B.Sigler, Z.Xu, H.S.Rye, S.G.Burston, W.A.Fenton, and A.L.Horwich (1998).
Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding.
  Annu Rev Biochem, 67, 581-608.  
  9563818 R.Jaenicke (1998).
Protein self-organization in vitro and in vivo: partitioning between physical biochemistry and cell biology.
  Biol Chem, 379, 237-243.  
9538692 W.J.Netzer, and F.U.Hartl (1998).
Protein folding in the cytosol: chaperonin-dependent and -independent mechanisms.
  Trends Biochem Sci, 23, 68-73.  
9774331 Y.Dubaquié, R.Looser, U.Fünfschilling, P.Jenö, and S.Rospert (1998).
Identification of in vivo substrates of the yeast mitochondrial chaperonins reveals overlapping but non-identical requirement for hsp60 and hsp10.
  EMBO J, 17, 5868-5876.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB code is shown on the right.