 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Hydrolase
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Oxidized pea fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase form 1
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. Chain: a, b, c, d. Synonym: fbpase,d-fructose-1,6-bisphosphate 1- phosphohydrolase. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Pisum sativum. Pea. Organism_taxid: 3888. Organelle: chloroplast. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Tetramer (from
)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.40Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.186
|
R-free:
|
0.236
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
M.Chiadmi,A.Navaza,M.Miginiac-Maslow,J.-P.Jacquot,J.Cherfils
|
Key ref:
|
 |
M.Chiadmi
et al.
(1999).
Redox signalling in the chloroplast: structure of oxidized pea fructose-1,6-bisphosphate phosphatase.
EMBO J,
18,
6809-6815.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
29-Oct-99
|
Release date:
|
03-Dec-99
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P46275
(F16P1_PEA) -
Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, chloroplastic
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
407 a.a.
323 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 3 residue positions (black
crosses)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.3.1.3.11
- Fructose-bisphosphatase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

Pathway:
|
 |
Pentose Phosphate Pathway (later stages)
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
D-fructose 1,6-bisphosphate + H2O = D-fructose 6-phosphate + phosphate
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
D-fructose 1,6-bisphosphate
|
+
|
H(2)O
|
=
|
D-fructose 6-phosphate
|
+
|
phosphate
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
carbohydrate metabolic process
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
phosphoric ester hydrolase activity
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
EMBO J
18:6809-6815
(1999)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Redox signalling in the chloroplast: structure of oxidized pea fructose-1,6-bisphosphate phosphatase.
|
|
M.Chiadmi,
A.Navaza,
M.Miginiac-Maslow,
J.P.Jacquot,
J.Cherfils.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Sunlight provides the energy source for the assimilation of carbon dioxide by
photosynthesis, but it also provides regulatory signals that switch on specific
sets of enzymes involved in the alternation of light and dark metabolisms in
chloroplasts. Capture of photons by chlorophyll pigments triggers redox cascades
that ultimately activate target enzymes via the reduction of regulatory
disulfide bridges by thioredoxins. Here we report the structure of the oxidized,
low-activity form of chloroplastic fructose-1, 6-bisphosphate phosphatase
(FBPase), one of the four enzymes of the Calvin cycle whose activity is
redox-regulated by light. The regulation is of allosteric nature, with a
disulfide bridge promoting the disruption of the catalytic site across a
distance of 20 A. Unexpectedly, regulation of plant FBPases by thiol-disulfide
interchange differs in every respect from the regulation of mammalian
gluconeogenic FBPases by AMP. We also report a second crystal form of oxidized
FBPase whose tetrameric structure departs markedly from D(2) symmetry, a rare
event in oligomeric structures, and the structure of a constitutively active
mutant that is unable to form the regulatory disulfide bridge. Altogether, these
structures provide a structural basis for redox regulation in the chloroplast.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2 Comparison of oxidized pea FBPase to pig kidney and
spinach FBPases. (A) Oxidized form I pea FBPase. (B)
Chloroplastic spinach FBPase (PDB entry code 1SPI) (Villeret et
al., 1995). (C) R form gluconeogenic pig kidney FBPase in
complex with F6P, P[i] and Zn2+ (PDB entry code 1CNQ) (Choe et
al., 1998). (D) Close-up view of the cation binding site with
pig kidney FBPase shown in blue, cations in red and oxidized pea
FBPase in yellow. Orientation and colour coding in (A), (B) and
(C) are as in Figure 1A. The location of the active site in pea
and spinach FBPases is indicated by a model of F6P, P[i] and
Zn2+ shown as dashed lines. The 70's loop in pig kidney FBPase
is in blue. The corresponding loop is disordered in pea and
spinach FBPases. The loop in pig kidney FBPase that corresponds
to the chloroplastic insertion is in red. The binding site for
AMP in pig kidney FBPase is indicated by one of its ligands,
Lys112. The close-up view in (D) shows that the interaction of
the 70's loop and the loop between strands 1
and 2
with the cations in pig FBPase, is prevented by the inwards
movement of strands 1and
2
in oxidized pea FBPase. This movement places Val109 near the
location of the cation binding site and removes Glu105, which
corresponds to Glu97 in pig kidney FBPase, from the active site.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3 The insertion in wild-type form I (dark grey) and in
the Cys173Ser mutant (light grey). Residues 155 -168 are weakly
defined in the electron density of form I (dashed lines) and
cannot be traced in the C173S mutant.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
EMBO J
(1999,
18,
6809-6815)
copyright 1999.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
K.Chibani,
J.Couturier,
B.Selles,
J.P.Jacquot,
and
N.Rouhier
(2010).
The chloroplastic thiol reducing systems: dual functions in the regulation of carbohydrate metabolism and regeneration of antioxidant enzymes, emphasis on the poplar redoxin equipment.
|
| |
Photosynth Res, 104,
75-99.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.J.Dietz,
J.P.Jacquot,
and
G.Harris
(2010).
Hubs and bottlenecks in plant molecular signalling networks.
|
| |
New Phytol, 188,
919-938.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Serrato,
J.de Dios Barajas-López,
A.Chueca,
and
M.Sahrawy
(2009).
Changing sugar partitioning in FBPase-manipulated plants.
|
| |
J Exp Bot, 60,
2923-2931.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Muthuramalingam,
T.Seidel,
M.Laxa,
S.M.Nunes de Miranda,
F.Gärtner,
E.Ströher,
A.Kandlbinder,
and
K.J.Dietz
(2009).
Multiple redox and non-redox interactions define 2-cys peroxiredoxin as a regulatory hub in the chloroplast.
|
| |
Mol Plant, 2,
1273-1288.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.W.Fan,
R.A.George,
N.L.Haworth,
L.L.Feng,
J.Y.Liu,
and
M.A.Wouters
(2009).
Conformational changes in redox pairs of protein structures.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 18,
1745-1765.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Shen,
D.E.Walters,
and
D.M.Mueller
(2008).
Introduction of the chloroplast redox regulatory region in the yeast ATP synthase impairs cytochrome C oxidase.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 283,
32937-32943.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Schürmann,
and
B.B.Buchanan
(2008).
The ferredoxin/thioredoxin system of oxygenic photosynthesis.
|
| |
Antioxid Redox Signal, 10,
1235-1274.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Oesterhelt,
S.Klocke,
S.Holtgrefe,
V.Linke,
A.P.Weber,
and
R.Scheibe
(2007).
Redox regulation of chloroplast enzymes in Galdieria sulphuraria in view of eukaryotic evolution.
|
| |
Plant Cell Physiol, 48,
1359-1373.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.D.Lemaire,
L.Michelet,
M.Zaffagnini,
V.Massot,
and
E.Issakidis-Bourguet
(2007).
Thioredoxins in chloroplasts.
|
| |
Curr Genet, 51,
343-365.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Fermani,
F.Sparla,
G.Falini,
P.L.Martelli,
R.Casadio,
P.Pupillo,
A.Ripamonti,
and
P.Trost
(2007).
Molecular mechanism of thioredoxin regulation in photosynthetic A2B2-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104,
11109-11114.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Maeda,
P.Hägglund,
C.Finnie,
B.Svensson,
and
A.Henriksen
(2006).
Structural basis for target protein recognition by the protein disulfide reductase thioredoxin.
|
| |
Structure, 14,
1701-1710.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Naderer,
M.A.Ellis,
M.F.Sernee,
D.P.De Souza,
J.Curtis,
E.Handman,
and
M.J.McConville
(2006).
Virulence of Leishmania major in macrophages and mice requires the gluconeogenic enzyme fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103,
5502-5507.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.B.Buchanan,
and
Y.Balmer
(2005).
Redox regulation: a broadening horizon.
|
| |
Annu Rev Plant Biol, 56,
187-220.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Cazalis,
A.Chueca,
M.Sahrawy,
and
J.López-Gorgé
(2004).
Construction of chimeric cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatases by insertion of a chloroplastic redox regulatory cluster.
|
| |
J Physiol Biochem, 60,
7.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.A.Stieglitz,
B.A.Seaton,
J.F.Head,
B.Stec,
and
M.F.Roberts
(2003).
Unexpected similarity in regulation between an archaeal inositol monophosphatase/fructose bisphosphatase and chloroplast fructose bisphosphatase.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 12,
760-767.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Alphey,
M.Gabrielsen,
E.Micossi,
G.A.Leonard,
S.M.McSweeney,
R.B.Ravelli,
E.Tetaud,
A.H.Fairlamb,
C.S.Bond,
and
W.N.Hunter
(2003).
Tryparedoxins from Crithidia fasciculata and Trypanosoma brucei: photoreduction of the redox disulfide using synchrotron radiation and evidence for a conformational switch implicated in function.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 278,
25919-25925.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Schürmann
(2003).
Redox signaling in the chloroplast: the ferredoxin/thioredoxin system.
|
| |
Antioxid Redox Signal, 5,
69-78.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Balmer,
A.Koller,
G.del Val,
W.Manieri,
P.Schürmann,
and
B.B.Buchanan
(2003).
Proteomics gives insight into the regulatory function of chloroplast thioredoxins.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100,
370-375.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.E.Cooper,
R.P.Patel,
P.S.Brookes,
and
V.M.Darley-Usmar
(2002).
Nanotransducers in cellular redox signaling: modification of thiols by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci, 27,
489-492.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Sparla,
P.Pupillo,
and
P.Trost
(2002).
The C-terminal extension of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase subunit B acts as an autoinhibitory domain regulated by thioredoxins and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 277,
44946-44952.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Jacquot,
N.Rouhier,
and
E.Gelhaye
(2002).
Redox control by dithiol-disulfide exchange in plants: I. The chloroplastic systems.
|
| |
Ann N Y Acad Sci, 973,
508-519.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.W.Nelson,
R.B.Honzatko,
and
H.J.Fromm
(2002).
Hybrid tetramers of porcine liver fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase reveal multiple pathways of allosteric inhibition.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 277,
15539-15545.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Nakamura,
T.Tada,
K.Wada,
T.Kinoshita,
M.Tamoi,
S.Shigeoka,
and
K.Nishimura
(2001).
Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the fructose-1,6-/sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase of Synechococcus PCC 7942.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 57,
454-456.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Qin,
Y.Yang,
A.Velyvis,
and
A.Gronenborn
(2000).
Molecular views of redox regulation: three-dimensional structures of redox regulatory proteins and protein complexes.
|
| |
Antioxid Redox Signal, 2,
827-840.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Schurmann,
and
J.P.Jacquot
(2000).
PLANT THIOREDOXIN SYSTEMS REVISITED.
|
| |
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 51,
371-400.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.S.Hutchison,
Q.Groom,
and
D.R.Ort
(2000).
Differential effects of chilling-induced photooxidation on the redox regulation of photosynthetic enzymes.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 39,
6679-6688.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Dai,
C.Schwendtmayer,
P.Schürmann,
S.Ramaswamy,
and
H.Eklund
(2000).
Redox signaling in chloroplasts: cleavage of disulfides by an iron-sulfur cluster.
|
| |
Science, 287,
655-658.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|