spacer
spacer
Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands Protein-protein interface(s) links
Hydrolase PDB id
1cqd
Jmol
Contents
Protein chains
216 a.a. *
Ligands
NAG-FUL-NAG
NAG-NAG
THJ ×4
NAG-FUC-NAG ×2
NAG
NAG-NAG-FUC
Waters ×373
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
1cqd
Name: Hydrolase
Title: The 2.1 angstrom structure of a cysteine protease with proli specificity from ginger rhizome, zingiber officinale
Structure: Protein (protease ii). Chain: a, b, c, d. Other_details: tetrathionate attached to cys-27
Source: Zingiber officinale. Organism_taxid: 94328. Other_details: purified from ground ginger root
Resolution:
2.10Å     R-factor:   0.213     R-free:   0.249
Authors: K.H.Choi,R.A.Laursen,K.N.Allen
Key ref:
K.H.Choi et al. (1999). The 2.1 A structure of a cysteine protease with proline specificity from ginger rhizome, Zingiber officinale. Biochemistry, 38, 11624-11633. PubMed id: 10512617 DOI: 10.1021/bi990651b
Date:
15-Jun-99     Release date:   28-Sep-99    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chains
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P82474  (CPGP2_ZINOF) -  Zingipain-2
Seq:
Struc:
221 a.a.
216 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain

 Enzyme reactions 
   Enzyme class: E.C.3.4.22.67  - Zingipain.
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]
 Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation 
  GO annot!
  Biological process     proteolysis   1 term 
  Biochemical function     hydrolase activity     4 terms  

 

 
DOI no: 10.1021/bi990651b Biochemistry 38:11624-11633 (1999)
PubMed id: 10512617  
 
 
The 2.1 A structure of a cysteine protease with proline specificity from ginger rhizome, Zingiber officinale.
K.H.Choi, R.A.Laursen, K.N.Allen.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
A cysteine protease from ginger rhizome (GP-II) cleaves peptides and proteins with proline at the P(2) position. The unusual specificity for proline makes GP-II an attractive tool for protein sequencing and identification of stably folded domains in proteins. The enzyme is a 221 amino acid glycoprotein possessing two N-linked oligosaccharide chains (8% glycosylated by weight) at Asn99 and Asn156. The availability of the sequence of these glycosyl chains afforded the opportunity to observe their structure and impact on protein conformation. The three-dimensional structure of GP-II has been determined by X-ray crystallography to a resolution of 2.1 A (overall R-factor = 0.214, free R = 0.248). The overall structure of GP-II is similar to that of the homologous cysteine proteases papain, actinidin, and glycyl endopeptidase, folding into two distinct domains of roughly equal size which are divided by a cleft. The observed N-linked glycosyl chains (half the total carbohydrate sequence) participate in both crystallographic and noncrystallographic contacts, tethering the proteins together via hydrogen bonds to the carbohydrate residues without intervening ordered water molecules. The putative S(2) binding pocket (the proline recognition site) was identified by superposition of the GP-II structure with structures of four previously determined papain-inhibitor complexes. The particular enzymic amino acids forming the S(2) pocket of GP-II (Trp, Met, and Ala) are similar to those found in the proline binding pockets of the unrelated enzymes alpha-lytic protease and cyclophilin. However, there is no conserved three-dimensional arrangement of these residues between the three enzymes (i.e., no proline binding motif). Thus, the particular amino acids found at S(2) are consistent with a binding pocket for a moiety with the steric characteristics and charge distribution of proline. Size exclusion is also a mechanism for selectivity compared to the S(2) binding pocket of papain. The S(2) binding pocket of GP-II greatly restricts the size of the side chain which could be bound because of the occurrence of a tryptophan in place of the corresponding tyrosine in papain. In light of the nature of the binding pocket, the specificity of GP-II for proline over other small nonpolar amino acids may be attributed to a direct effect of proline on the substrate peptide backbone conformation.
 

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
19455353 S.A.Trejo, L.M.López, N.O.Caffini, C.L.Natalucci, F.Canals, and F.X.Avilés (2009).
Sequencing and characterization of asclepain f: the first cysteine peptidase cDNA cloned and expressed from Asclepias fruticosa latex.
  Planta, 230, 319-328.  
18167146 R.Ghosh, S.Chakraborty, C.Chakrabarti, J.K.Dattagupta, and S.Biswas (2008).
Structural insights into the substrate specificity and activity of ervatamins, the papain-like cysteine proteases from a tropical plant, Ervatamia coronaria.
  FEBS J, 275, 421-434.
PDB codes: 2pre 2psc 3bcn
17452780 J.A.Gavira, L.A.González-Ramírez, M.C.Oliver-Salvador, M.Soriano-García, and J.M.García-Ruiz (2007).
Structure of the mexicain-E-64 complex and comparison with other cysteine proteases of the papain family.
  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 63, 555-563.  
12784208 S.Biswas, C.Chakrabarti, S.Kundu, M.V.Jagannadham, and J.K.Dattagupta (2003).
Proposed amino acid sequence and the 1.63 A X-ray crystal structure of a plant cysteine protease, ervatamin B: some insights into the structural basis of its stability and substrate specificity.
  Proteins, 51, 489-497.
PDB code: 1iwd
12592020 Y.A.Sabnis, P.V.Desai, P.J.Rosenthal, and M.A.Avery (2003).
Probing the structure of falcipain-3, a cysteine protease from Plasmodium falciparum: comparative protein modeling and docking studies.
  Protein Sci, 12, 501-509.  
11517946 S.V.Cavalli, A.Cortadi, M.C.Arribére, P.Conforti, N.O.Caffini, and N.Priolo (2001).
Comparison of two cysteine endopeptidases from latices of Morrenia brachystephana Griseb. and Morrenia odorata (Hook et Arn.) Lindley (Asclepiadaceae).
  Biol Chem, 382, 879-883.  
10691991 K.H.Choi, and R.A.Laursen (2000).
Amino-acid sequence and glycan structures of cysteine proteases with proline specificity from ginger rhizome Zingiber officinale.
  Eur J Biochem, 267, 1516-1526.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.