 |
PDBsum entry 1ce3
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protease inhibitor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1ce3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
7:793-802
(1999)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure of a putative ancestral protein encoded by a single sequence repeat from a multidomain proteinase inhibitor gene from Nicotiana alata.
|
|
M.J.Scanlon,
M.C.Lee,
M.A.Anderson,
D.J.Craik.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
BACKGROUND: The ornamental tobacco Nicotiana alata produces a series of
proteinase inhibitors (PIs) that are derived from a 43 kDa precursor protein,
NaProPI. NaProPI contains six highly homologous repeats that fold to generate
six separate structural domains, each corresponding to one of the native PIs. An
unusual feature of NaProPI is that the structural domains lie across adjacent
repeats and that the sixth PI domain is generated from fragments of the first
and sixth repeats. Although the homology of the repeats suggests that they may
have arisen from gene duplication, the observed folding does not appear to
support this. This study of the solution structure of a single NaProPI repeat
(aPI1) forms a basis for unravelling the mechanism by which this protein may
have evolved. RESULTS: The three-dimensional structure of aPI1 closely resembles
the triple-stranded antiparallel beta sheet observed in each of the native PIs.
The five-residue sequence Glu-Glu-Lys-Lys-Asn, which forms the linker between
the six structural domains in NaProPI, exists as a disordered loop in aPI1. The
presence of this loop in aPI1 results in a loss of the characteristically flat
and disc-like topography of the native inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: A single repeat
from NaProPI is capable of folding into a compact globular domain that displays
native-like PI activity. Consequently, it is possible that a similar
single-domain inhibitor represents the ancestral protein from which NaProPI
evolved.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the secondary structural
elements of aPI1 showing the NOEs betweenβ strands
(double-headed arrows) and the position of proposed hydrogen
bonds (broken lines).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figure is
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(1999,
7,
793-802)
copyright 1999.
|
|
| |
Figure was
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
L.Kong,
and
S.Ranganathan
(2008).
Tandem duplication, circular permutation, molecular adaptation: how Solanaceae resist pests via inhibitors.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics,
9,
S22.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.T.Christeller
(2005).
Evolutionary mechanisms acting on proteinase inhibitor variability.
|
| |
FEBS J,
272,
5710-5722.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Barta,
A.Pintar,
and
S.Pongor
(2002).
Repeats with variations: accelerated evolution of the Pin2 family of proteinase inhibitors.
|
| |
Trends Genet,
18,
600-603.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |