|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Immune system
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure analysis of the gamma/delta t cell ligand t22
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Mhc-like protein t22. Chain: a, c, e, g. Protein (beta-2-microglobulin). Chain: b, d, f, h
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Mus musculus. House mouse. Organism_taxid: 10090. Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Tetramer (from
)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
3.10Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.284
|
R-free:
|
0.334
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
C.Wingren,M.P.Crowley,M.Degano,Y.Chien,I.A.Wilson
|
Key ref:
|
 |
C.Wingren
et al.
(2000).
Crystal structure of a gammadelta T cell receptor ligand T22: a truncated MHC-like fold.
Science,
287,
310-314.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
20-Jul-99
|
Release date:
|
26-Jan-00
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Cellular component
|
extracellular region
|
8 terms
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
immune response
|
8 terms
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
protein binding
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Science
287:310-314
(2000)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Crystal structure of a gammadelta T cell receptor ligand T22: a truncated MHC-like fold.
|
|
C.Wingren,
M.P.Crowley,
M.Degano,
Y.Chien,
I.A.Wilson.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Murine T10 and T22 are highly related nonclassical major histocompatibility
complex (MHC) class Ib proteins that bind to certain gammadelta T cell receptors
(TCRs) in the absence of other components. The crystal structure of T22b at 3.1
angstroms reveals similarities to MHC class I molecules, but one side of the
normal peptide-binding groove is severely truncated, which allows direct access
to the beta-sheet floor. Potential gammadelta TCR-binding sites can be inferred
from functional mapping of T10 and T22 point mutants and allelic variants. Thus,
T22 represents an unusual variant of the MHC-like fold and indicates that
gammadelta and alphabeta TCRs interact differently with their respective MHC
ligands.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Three-dimensional structures of T22^b and a classical
MHC class I molecule (HLA-A2) (16, 17). (A) Ribbon diagram of
the mouse T22^b heavy chain and human [2]M
heterodimer. The two loop regions that adopt slightly different
conformations in the four T22^b monomers of the asymmetric unit
(22) are shown and colored yellow, cyan, magenta, and dark blue.
No electron density was observed for residues 148 to
153 in
molecule 3 (yellow) (22). Cysteine side chains (yellow) are
shown in a ball-and-stick fashion (23). The Asn residues (86 and
150) of probable N-linked glycosylation sites are colored in
black [(C) and (D) only]. (B) Ribbon diagram of HLA-A2. The
molecule is color coded as for T22^b (C) Top view of the 1 and 2 domains
of T22^b. (D) Top view of the 1 and 2 domains
of HLA-A2. PROMOTIF was used to identify secondary structure
elements (32). Figures 1, 2, and 3 were generated with MOLSCRIPT
(32) and RASTER3D (32). N, NH[2]-terminal; C, COOH-terminal.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Top view of the 1 2 domains
of T22^b. (A) Stereoview of the molecular surface of the 1 2 domains
of T22^b. Electrostatic potentials were calculated in GRASP
(32); positive potential ( 15 mv) is
colored blue, neutral potential (0 mv) is colored gray, and
negative potential (  15 mv) is
colored red. (B) Stereoview showing potential  T
cell-binding sites on the 1 2 domains
of T22^b. G8 and KN6 recognize T10^b, T10^k, and T10^129 and
T22^b and T22^129 (3, 4). T22^k and T22^d are not expressed on
the cell surface (3, 35); thus, the following amino acid changes
are tolerated: Asn59 Asp, Arg65
His,
Gly100 Asp,
Arg107 Gln, Asn127 Ser,
His155 Gln,
Asp159 His,
Lys161 Glu,
Ser162 Gly, and
Leu167 Val
(yellow) (33). In contrast, neither G8 nor KN6 recognizes T10^d.
Antibody staining and surface immunoprecipitation indicate that
this molecule is expressed on the cell surface (35). Three
differences occur in T10^d as compared with T10^b and T22^b:
Arg35 Leu, Asp58
Gly, and
Phe^124 His (red).
Although one of these mutations could affect the epitope for G8
and KN6, Asp58 is on the negatively charged NH[2]-terminal loop,
whereas Phe^124 is on the exposed -sheet
floor. In addition, KN6 can be stimulated by mutant T22^b
molecules with single alanine substitutions at positions Arg6,
Tyr9, Ile^23, Val25, or Gln115 (green), but not at positions
Leu5, Tyr7, Leu95, Leu98, or Leu116 (purple) (30). Because Tyr7
normally forms a hydrogen bond with Gln63, a mutation at this
position is more likely to affect the interaction between the
 TCR and
T22 by secondary effects, such as local disruption of the T22
structure (hence, Tyr7 is colored in green). It is also unclear
whether any of these mutant proteins were expressed on the cell
surface (30). The limited sequence heterogeneity between T22 and
T10 is located mainly in the exposed portion of the 1 2
platform; therefore, T10 is predicted to have a closely similar
fold to T22. (C) Similar to (B), but now displaying the
accessible molecular surface. (A) and (C) were generated with
GRASP (32). The two possible binding sites for the  TCR are
shown by arrows and emphasize the data obtained from the allelic
variants (red).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the AAAs:
Science
(2000,
287,
310-314)
copyright 2000.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
E.Champagne
(2011).
γδ T cell Receptor Ligands and Modes of Antigen Recognition.
|
| |
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz), 59,
117-137.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.J.Adams,
P.Strop,
S.Shin,
Y.H.Chien,
and
K.C.Garcia
(2008).
An autonomous CDR3delta is sufficient for recognition of the nonclassical MHC class I molecules T10 and T22 by gammadelta T cells.
|
| |
Nat Immunol, 9,
777-784.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.I.Hassan,
V.Kumar,
T.P.Singh,
and
S.Yadav
(2008).
Purification and characterization of zinc alpha2-glycoprotein-prolactin inducible protein complex from human seminal plasma.
|
| |
J Sep Sci, 31,
2318-2324.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.K.Chapes,
and
R.R.Ganta
(2008).
Defining the immune response to Ehrlichia species using murine models.
|
| |
Vet Parasitol, 158,
344-359.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.J.Adams,
Z.S.Juo,
R.T.Venook,
M.J.Boulanger,
H.Arase,
L.L.Lanier,
and
K.C.Garcia
(2007).
Structural elucidation of the m157 mouse cytomegalovirus ligand for Ly49 natural killer cell receptors.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104,
10128-10133.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
W.K.Born,
N.Jin,
M.K.Aydintug,
J.M.Wands,
J.D.French,
C.L.Roark,
and
R.L.O'Brien
(2007).
gammadelta T lymphocytes-selectable cells within the innate system?
|
| |
J Clin Immunol, 27,
133-144.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.H.Chien,
and
Y.Konigshofer
(2007).
Antigen recognition by gammadelta T cells.
|
| |
Immunol Rev, 215,
46-58.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.G.Rudolph,
R.L.Stanfield,
and
I.A.Wilson
(2006).
How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors.
|
| |
Annu Rev Immunol, 24,
419-466.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Konigshofer,
and
Y.H.Chien
(2006).
Gammadelta T cells - innate immune lymphocytes?
|
| |
Curr Opin Immunol, 18,
527-533.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.R.Rodgers,
and
R.G.Cook
(2005).
MHC class Ib molecules bridge innate and acquired immunity.
|
| |
Nat Rev Immunol, 5,
459-471.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Shao,
O.Kamalu,
and
L.Mayer
(2005).
Non-classical MHC class I molecules on intestinal epithelial cells: mediators of mucosal crosstalk.
|
| |
Immunol Rev, 206,
160-176.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Olson,
K.E.Huey-Tubman,
C.Dulac,
and
P.J.Bjorkman
(2005).
Structure of a pheromone receptor-associated MHC molecule with an open and empty groove.
|
| |
PLoS Biol, 3,
e257.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.G.Rudolph,
C.Wingren,
M.P.Crowley,
Y.H.Chien,
and
I.A.Wilson
(2004).
Combined pseudo-merohedral twinning, non-crystallographic symmetry and pseudo-translation in a monoclinic crystal form of the gammadelta T-cell ligand T10.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 60,
656-664.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Ishii,
J.Hirota,
and
P.Mombaerts
(2003).
Combinatorial coexpression of neural and immune multigene families in mouse vomeronasal sensory neurons.
|
| |
Curr Biol, 13,
394-400.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Liu,
Y.Xiong,
O.V.Naidenko,
J.H.Liu,
R.Zhang,
A.Joachimiak,
M.Kronenberg,
H.Cheroutre,
E.L.Reinherz,
and
J.H.Wang
(2003).
The crystal structure of a TL/CD8alphaalpha complex at 2.1 A resolution: implications for modulation of T cell activation and memory.
|
| |
Immunity, 18,
205-215.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.R.Steele,
D.E.Oppenheim,
and
A.C.Hayday
(2000).
Gamma(delta) T cells: non-classical ligands for non-classical cells.
|
| |
Curr Biol, 10,
R282-R285.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|