 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signaling protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1bt0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
273:34976-34982
(1998)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The rub family of ubiquitin-like proteins. Crystal structure of Arabidopsis rub1 and expression of multiple rubs in Arabidopsis.
|
|
C.Rao-Naik,
W.delaCruz,
J.M.Laplaza,
S.Tan,
J.Callis,
A.J.Fisher.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Several proteins with significant identity to ubiquitin have been characterized
recently. In contrast to ubiquitin's main role in targeting proteins for
degradation, a described function of one family of ubiquitin-related proteins,
the Rub family, is to serve as a stable post-translational modification of a
complex involved in the G1-to-S cell cycle transition. Rub proteins have been
found in animals, plants, and fungi and consist of 76 residues with 52-63%
identity to ubiquitin. In this study three different RUB proteins within the
plant Arabidopsis are identified; two differ by only 1 amino acid, while the
third is only 77.6% identical to the other two. Genes encoding all three are
expressed in multiple organs. In addition, we report the crystal structure of
higher plant RUB1 at 1.7-A resolution to help elucidate the functional
differences between Rub and ubiquitin. RUB1 contains a single globular domain
with a flexible COOH-terminal extension. The overall RUB1 structure is very
similar to ubiquitin. The majority of the amino acid differences between RUB1
and ubiquitin map to the surface. These changes alter the electrostatic surface
potential in two regions and likely confer specificity between ubiquitin and
RUB1 and their ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1) or E1-like activating enzymes.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Ribbon diagram of RUB1. Shown are all the
secondary structure elements in RUB, which are conserved in
ubiquitin (37). The last 3 residues at the carboxyl terminus
(74-76) in RUB1 are not drawn because of poor electron density
in this region and unsatisfactory refinement statistics when
included.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. Electrostatic potential surface map.
Electrostatic surface comparison using the program GRASP (54)
shows significant differences on one face of RUB1 (a) in
comparison with the corresponding face of ubiquitin (b). The
residues that contribute to the electronegative surface in RUB1
are Glu28 and Glu31, which are Ala and Gln, respectively, in
ubiquitin. The opposite side of RUB1 (c) and ubiquitin (d) (view
rotated 180° along the vertical from a and b), on the other
hand, is highly conserved, with the exception of the presence of
positively charged Lys4 and negatively charged Glu12 and Glu14
in RUB1. Blue denotes electropositive, while red denotes
electronegative.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(1998,
273,
34976-34982)
copyright 1998.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
S.K.Hotton,
R.A.Eigenheer,
M.F.Castro,
M.Bostick,
and
J.Callis
(2011).
AXR1-ECR1 and AXL1-ECR1 heterodimeric RUB-activating enzymes diverge in function in Arabidopsis thaliana.
|
| |
Plant Mol Biol, 75,
515-526.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Hua,
and
R.D.Vierstra
(2011).
The cullin-RING ubiquitin-protein ligases.
|
| |
Annu Rev Plant Biol, 62,
299-334.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.T.Huang,
O.Ayrault,
H.W.Hunt,
A.M.Taherbhoy,
D.M.Duda,
D.C.Scott,
L.A.Borg,
G.Neale,
P.J.Murray,
M.F.Roussel,
and
B.A.Schulman
(2009).
E2-RING expansion of the NEDD8 cascade confers specificity to cullin modification.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 33,
483-495.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Falini,
S.Fermani,
G.Tosi,
F.Arnesano,
and
G.Natile
(2008).
Structural probing of Zn(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II) binding to human ubiquitin.
|
| |
Chem Commun (Camb), 0,
5960-5962.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Rabut,
and
M.Peter
(2008).
Function and regulation of protein neddylation. 'Protein modifications: beyond the usual suspects' review series.
|
| |
EMBO Rep, 9,
969-976.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Zhou,
P.J.Enyeart,
and
C.O.Wilke
(2008).
Detecting clusters of mutations.
|
| |
PLoS ONE, 3,
e3765.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Dreher,
and
J.Callis
(2007).
Ubiquitin, hormones and biotic stress in plants.
|
| |
Ann Bot, 99,
787-822.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.D.Lowe,
N.Hasan,
J.F.Trempe,
L.Fonso,
M.E.Noble,
J.A.Endicott,
L.N.Johnson,
and
N.R.Brown
(2006).
Structures of the Dsk2 UBL and UBA domains and their complex.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 62,
177-188.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Parry,
and
M.Estelle
(2004).
Regulation of cullin-based ubiquitin ligases by the Nedd8/RUB ubiquitin-like proteins.
|
| |
Semin Cell Dev Biol, 15,
221-229.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Smalle,
and
R.D.Vierstra
(2004).
The ubiquitin 26S proteasome proteolytic pathway.
|
| |
Annu Rev Plant Biol, 55,
555-590.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Ginalski,
L.Rychlewski,
D.Baker,
and
N.V.Grishin
(2004).
Protein structure prediction for the male-specific region of the human Y chromosome.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101,
2305-2310.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Novatchkova,
R.Budhiraja,
G.Coupland,
F.Eisenhaber,
and
A.Bachmair
(2004).
SUMO conjugation in plants.
|
| |
Planta, 220,
1-8.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.C.Schwartz,
and
M.Hochstrasser
(2003).
A superfamily of protein tags: ubiquitin, SUMO and related modifiers.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci, 28,
321-328.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.D.Mueller,
and
J.Feigon
(2003).
Structural determinants for the binding of ubiquitin-like domains to the proteasome.
|
| |
EMBO J, 22,
4634-4645.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.McNally,
Q.Huang,
R.S.Janis,
Z.Liu,
E.T.Olejniczak,
and
R.M.Reilly
(2003).
Structural analysis of UBL5, a novel ubiquitin-like modifier.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 12,
1562-1566.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Bachmair,
M.Novatchkova,
T.Potuschak,
and
F.Eisenhaber
(2001).
Ubiquitylation in plants: a post-genomic look at a post-translational modification.
|
| |
Trends Plant Sci, 6,
463-470.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Mossessova,
and
C.D.Lima
(2000).
Ulp1-SUMO crystal structure and genetic analysis reveal conserved interactions and a regulatory element essential for cell growth in yeast.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 5,
865-876.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.M.Wyndham,
R.T.Baker,
and
G.Chelvanayagam
(1999).
The Ubp6 family of deubiquitinating enzymes contains a ubiquitin-like domain: SUb.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 8,
1268-1275.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.M.Gray,
J.C.del Pozo,
L.Walker,
L.Hobbie,
E.Risseeuw,
T.Banks,
W.L.Crosby,
M.Yang,
H.Ma,
and
M.Estelle
(1999).
Identification of an SCF ubiquitin-ligase complex required for auxin response in Arabidopsis thaliana.
|
| |
Genes Dev, 13,
1678-1691.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
del Pozo JC,
and
M.Estelle
(1999).
Function of the ubiquitin-proteosome pathway in auxin response.
|
| |
Trends Plant Sci, 4,
107-112.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|