spacer
spacer
Go to PDB code: 
protein Protein-protein interface(s) links
Bacterial chemotaxis PDB-id
1a2o
    Jmol     Help!  
Contents
Description
Header details
Header records
References
PROCHECK
Protein chains
347 a.a. *
Waters ×411

* Residue conservation analysis
Tools
Image Generation
AstexViewer™@PDBe
Run PROCHECK
Clefts Calculation
  
PDB id: 1a2o
Name: Bacterial chemotaxis
Title: Structural basis for methylesterase cheb regulation by a phosphorylation-activated domain

Structure:
Cheb methylesterase. Chain: a, b. Engineered: yes

Source:
Salmonella typhimurium. Organism_taxid: 602. Cellular_location: cytoplasm. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Expression_system_cell: hb101.

UniProt:
Chains A, B: P04042 (CHEB_SALTY)
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
Seq:
Struc:
Seq: 349 a.a.
Struc: 347 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain
 Secondary structure  CATH domain

Enzyme class:
E.C.3.1.1.61   [IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]

Reaction:
Protein L-glutamate O5-methyl ester + H2O = protein L-glutamate + methanol (see diagram below)

Resolution:
2.40Å

R-factor:
0.225

Authors:
S.Djordjevic,P.N.Goudreau,Q.Xu,A.M.Stock,A.H.West

Key ref:
S.Djordjevic et al. (1998). Structural basis for methylesterase CheB regulation by a phosphorylation-activated domain.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 95, 1381-1386. [PubMed id: 9465023] [DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1381]

Date:
06-Jan-98

Release date:
29-Apr-98
Quick_links
RCSB
PDBe
SRS
MMDB
JenaLib
OCA
PDBWiki
Proteopedia
CATH
SCOP
FSSP
HSSP
PDBSWS
PQS
CSA
ProSAT
Whatcheck
EDS
Procheck
Go to PROCHECK summary
Clefts
Clefts
Surface
RasMol surface
spacer
spacer
Enzyme reaction for E.C.3.1.1.61


Protein L-glutamate O(5)-methyl ester
+ H(2)O
=
protein L-glutamate
+
methanol
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the KEGG ftp site.

 
    Key reference    
 
 
DOI no: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1381 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:1381-1386 (1998)
PubMed id: 9465023  
 
 
Structural basis for methylesterase CheB regulation by a phosphorylation-activated domain.
S.Djordjevic, P.N.Goudreau, Q.Xu, A.M.Stock, A.H.West.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
We report the x-ray crystal structure of the methylesterase CheB, a phosphorylation-activated response regulator involved in reversible modification of bacterial chemotaxis receptors. Methylesterase CheB and methyltransferase CheR modulate signaling output of the chemotaxis receptors by controlling the level of receptor methylation. The structure of CheB, which consists of an N-terminal regulatory domain and a C-terminal catalytic domain joined by a linker, was solved by molecular replacement methods using independent search models for the two domains. In unphosphorylated CheB, the N-terminal domain packs against the active site of the C-terminal domain and thus inhibits methylesterase activity by directly restricting access to the active site. We propose that phosphorylation of CheB induces a conformational change in the regulatory domain that disrupts the domain interface, resulting in a repositioning of the domains and allowing access to the active site. Structural similarity between the two companion receptor modification enzymes, CheB and CheR, suggests an evolutionary and/or functional relationship. Specifically, the phosphorylated N-terminal domain of CheB may facilitate interaction with the receptors, similar to the postulated role of the N-terminal domain of CheR. Examination of surfaces in the N-terminal regulatory domain of CheB suggests that despite a common fold throughout the response regulator family, surfaces used for protein-protein interactions differ significantly. Comparison between CheB and other response regulators indicates that analogous surfaces are used for different functions and conversely, similar functions are mediated by different molecular surfaces.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Structural comparison of the chemoreceptor modification enzymes. Structures of the methyltransferase CheR and the methylesterase^ CheB were aligned on the basis of similarity of their C-terminal domains by using a structural homology search in DALI (34). For both molecules, ribbon diagrams depict the N-terminal domains in blue, linker regions in gold, and C-terminal domains in green. The molecule of S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) in CheR and the methylesterase^ active site residues [Ser-164 (S), His-190 (H), and Asp-286(D)] in CheB are shown as CPK models. The double-headed arrow points toward the active sites and the receptor interaction openings. Functionally antagonistic CheB and CheR contain active sites on opposite faces of the structurally homologous central -sheets.
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. CPK model of the N-terminal domain of CheB, showing surfaces that are involved in protein-protein interactions among the response^ regulators CheB, CheY, and NarL. Residues involved in interaction with the C-terminal domain of CheB are colored yellow. Residues that have been implicated in protein-protein interactions in other response regulators are shown with colored mesh: red for corresponding residues in CheY that are thought to be involved in interaction with the P2 domain of the histidine kinase CheA (39); green for corresponding residues in NarL that interact with its C-terminal DNA-binding domain (25).
 
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
19156130 D.Kentner, and V.Sourjik (2009).
Dynamic map of protein interactions in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway.
  Mol Syst Biol, 5, 238.  
18363791 A.Briegel, H.J.Ding, Z.Li, J.Werner, Z.Gitai, D.P.Dias, R.B.Jensen, and G.J.Jensen (2008).
Location and architecture of the Caulobacter crescentus chemoreceptor array.
  Mol Microbiol, 69, 30-41.  
18330636 B.Harighi (2008).
Role of CheY1 and CheY2 in the chemotaxis of A. tumefaciens toward acetosyringone.
  Curr Microbiol, 56, 547-552.  
18179279 C.H.Hansen, R.G.Endres, and N.S.Wingreen (2008).
Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli: a molecular model for robust precise adaptation.
  PLoS Comput Biol, 4, e1.  
17339222 E.Bantinaki, R.Kassen, C.G.Knight, Z.Robinson, A.J.Spiers, and P.B.Rainey (2007).
Adaptive divergence in experimental populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. III. Mutational origins of wrinkly spreader diversity.
  Genetics, 176, 441-453.  
17322531 T.Gao, X.Zhang, N.B.Ivleva, S.S.Golden, and A.LiWang (2007).
NMR structure of the pseudo-receiver domain of CikA.
  Protein Sci, 16, 465-475.
PDB code: 2j48
16861632 M.A.Laskowski, and B.I.Kazmierczak (2006).
Mutational analysis of RetS, an unusual sensor kinase-response regulator hybrid required for Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence.
  Infect Immun, 74, 4462-4473.  
16929106 M.Solà, D.L.Drew, A.G.Blanco, F.X.Gomis-Rüth, and M.Coll (2006).
The cofactor-induced pre-active conformation in PhoB.
  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 62, 1046-1057.
PDB code: 2iyn
16740923 M.Y.Galperin (2006).
Structural classification of bacterial response regulators: diversity of output domains and domain combinations.
  J Bacteriol, 188, 4169-4182.  
16030204 W.C.Lai, and G.L.Hazelbauer (2005).
Carboxyl-terminal extensions beyond the conserved pentapeptide reduce rates of chemoreceptor adaptational modification.
  J Bacteriol, 187, 5115-5121.  
15569936 C.Chan, R.Paul, D.Samoray, N.C.Amiot, B.Giese, U.Jenal, and T.Schirmer (2004).
Structural basis of activity and allosteric control of diguanylate cyclase.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101, 17084-17089.
PDB code: 1w25
15573139 G.H.Wadhams, and J.P.Armitage (2004).
Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis.
  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 5, 1024-1037.  
15187186 H.Szurmant, and G.W.Ordal (2004).
Diversity in chemotaxis mechanisms among the bacteria and archaea.
  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 68, 301-319.  
14731287 J.G.Smith, J.A.Latiolais, G.P.Guanga, J.D.Pennington, R.E.Silversmith, and R.B.Bourret (2004).
A search for amino acid substitutions that universally activate response regulators.
  Mol Microbiol, 51, 887-901.  
15255896 K.Muchová, R.J.Lewis, D.Perecko, J.A.Brannigan, J.C.Ladds, A.Leech, A.J.Wilkinson, and I.Barák (2004).
Dimer-induced signal propagation in Spo0A.
  Mol Microbiol, 53, 829-842.  
15306010 S.Banno, D.Shiomi, M.Homma, and I.Kawagishi (2004).
Targeting of the chemotaxis methylesterase/deamidase CheB to the polar receptor-kinase cluster in an Escherichia coli cell.
  Mol Microbiol, 53, 1051-1063.  
15289606 S.Y.Park, B.D.Beel, M.I.Simon, A.M.Bilwes, and B.R.Crane (2004).
In different organisms, the mode of interaction between two signaling proteins is not necessarily conserved.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101, 11646-11651.
PDB code: 1u0s
15491370 X.Feng, D.Walthers, R.Oropeza, and L.J.Kenney (2004).
The response regulator SsrB activates transcription and binds to a region overlapping OmpR binding sites at Salmonella pathogenicity island 2.
  Mol Microbiol, 54, 823-835.  
14973033 Y.Chen, W.R.Abdel-Fattah, and F.M.Hulett (2004).
Residues required for Bacillus subtilis PhoP DNA binding or RNA polymerase interaction: alanine scanning of PhoP effector domain transactivation loop and alpha helix 3.
  J Bacteriol, 186, 1493-1502.  
12719226 B.A.Mello, and Y.Tu (2003).
Perfect and near-perfect adaptation in a model of bacterial chemotaxis.
  Biophys J, 84, 2943-2956.  
12486062 C.Birck, Y.Chen, F.M.Hulett, and J.P.Samama (2003).
The crystal structure of the phosphorylation domain in PhoP reveals a functional tandem association mediated by an asymmetric interface.
  J Bacteriol, 185, 254-261.
PDB code: 1mvo
12614149 J.H.Zhang, G.Xiao, R.P.Gunsalus, and W.L.Hubbell (2003).
Phosphorylation triggers domain separation in the DNA binding response regulator NarL.
  Biochemistry, 42, 2552-2559.  
12837793 V.L.Robinson, T.Wu, and A.M.Stock (2003).
Structural analysis of the domain interface in DrrB, a response regulator of the OmpR/PhoB subfamily.
  J Bacteriol, 185, 4186-4194.
PDB code: 1p2f
12352954 A.E.Maris, M.R.Sawaya, M.Kaczor-Grzeskowiak, M.R.Jarvis, S.M.Bearson, M.L.Kopka, I.Schröder, R.P.Gunsalus, and R.E.Dickerson (2002).
Dimerization allows DNA target site recognition by the NarL response regulator.
  Nat Struct Biol, 9, 771-778.
PDB code: 1je8
12022879 G.S.Anand, and A.M.Stock (2002).
Kinetic basis for the stimulatory effect of phosphorylation on the methylesterase activity of CheB.
  Biochemistry, 41, 6752-6760.  
12381845 P.Roche, L.Mouawad, D.Perahia, J.P.Samama, and D.Kahn (2002).
Molecular dynamics of the FixJ receiver domain: movement of the beta4-alpha4 loop correlates with the in and out flip of Phe101.
  Protein Sci, 11, 2622-2630.  
12208995 R.Hengge-Aronis (2002).
Signal transduction and regulatory mechanisms involved in control of the sigma(S) (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase.
  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 66, 373.  
11442836 E.Klauck, M.Lingnau, and R.Hengge-Aronis (2001).
Role of the response regulator RssB in sigma recognition and initiation of sigma proteolysis in Escherichia coli.
  Mol Microbiol, 40, 1381-1390.  
11244058 M.P.Allen, K.B.Zumbrennen, and W.R.McCleary (2001).
Genetic evidence that the alpha5 helix of the receiver domain of PhoB is involved in interdomain interactions.
  J Bacteriol, 183, 2204-2211.  
11669626 R.L.Saxl, G.S.Anand, and A.M.Stock (2001).
Synthesis and biochemical characterization of a phosphorylated analogue of the response regulator CheB.
  Biochemistry, 40, 12896-12903.  
11092844 A.Bren, and M.Eisenbach (2000).
How signals are heard during bacterial chemotaxis: protein-protein interactions in sensory signal propagation.
  J Bacteriol, 182, 6865-6873.  
10966457 A.M.Stock, V.L.Robinson, and P.N.Goudreau (2000).
Two-component signal transduction.
  Annu Rev Biochem, 69, 183-215.  
  10850799 G.S.Anand, P.N.Goudreau, J.K.Lewis, and A.M.Stoc (2000).
Evidence for phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes in methylesterase CheB.
  Protein Sci, 9, 898-906.  
10960104 J.Lee, J.T.Owens, I.Hwang, C.Meares, and S.Kustu (2000).
Phosphorylation-induced signal propagation in the response regulator ntrC.
  J Bacteriol, 182, 5188-5195.  
11069648 R.J.Lewis, S.Krzywda, J.A.Brannigan, J.P.Turkenburg, K.Muchová, E.J.Dodson, I.Barák, and A.J.Wilkinson (2000).
The trans-activation domain of the sporulation response regulator Spo0A revealed by X-ray crystallography.
  Mol Microbiol, 38, 198-212.
PDB code: 1fc3
11073909 R.P.Garg, J.Huang, W.Yindeeyoungyeon, T.P.Denny, and M.A.Schell (2000).
Multicomponent transcriptional regulation at the complex promoter of the exopolysaccharide I biosynthetic operon of Ralstonia solanacearum.
  J Bacteriol, 182, 6659-6666.  
10611291 D.Yan, H.S.Cho, C.A.Hastings, M.M.Igo, S.Y.Lee, J.G.Pelton, V.Stewart, D.E.Wemmer, and S.Kustu (1999).
Beryllofluoride mimics phosphorylation of NtrC and other bacterial response regulators.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96, 14789-14794.  
10027982 J.A.Freeman, and B.L.Bassler (1999).
A genetic analysis of the function of LuxO, a two-component response regulator involved in quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi.
  Mol Microbiol, 31, 665-677.  
10089466 K.Muchová, R.J.Lewis, J.A.Brannigan, W.A.Offen, D.P.Brown, I.Barák, P.Youngman, and A.J.Wilkinson (1999).
Crystallization of the regulatory and effector domains of the key sporulation response regulator Spo0A.
  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 55, 671-676.  
10393292 M.Kato, T.Shimizu, T.Mizuno, and T.Hakoshima (1999).
Structure of the histidine-containing phosphotransfer (HPt) domain of the anaerobic sensor protein ArcB complexed with the chemotaxis response regulator CheY.
  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 55, 1257-1263.
PDB code: 1bdj
10350484 M.N.Levit, Y.Liu, and J.B.Stock (1999).
Mechanism of CheA protein kinase activation in receptor signaling complexes.
  Biochemistry, 38, 6651-6658.  
10500179 R.Jasuja, Y.Lin, D.R.Trentham, and S.Khan (1999).
Response tuning in bacterial chemotaxis.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96, 11346-11351.  
10564492 S.Da Re, J.Schumacher, P.Rousseau, J.Fourment, C.Ebel, and D.Kahn (1999).
Phosphorylation-induced dimerization of the FixJ receiver domain.
  Mol Microbiol, 34, 504-511.  
10518529 S.K.Ames, N.Frankema, and L.J.Kenney (1999).
C-terminal DNA binding stimulates N-terminal phosphorylation of the outer membrane protein regulator OmpR from Escherichia coli.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96, 11792-11797.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB code is shown on the right.