spacer
spacer
Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands links
Carbohydrate-binding domain PDB id
1w8u
Jmol
Contents
Protein chain
141 a.a.
Ligands
BMA-BMA-BMA-BMA-
BMA
Waters ×166
PDB id:
1w8u
Name: Carbohydrate-binding domain
Title: Cbm29-2 mutant d83a complexed with mannohexaose: probing the mechanism of ligand recognition by family 29 carbohydrate binding modules
Structure: Non catalytic protein 1. Chain: a. Fragment: carbohydrate binding module 2, residues 334-478. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
Source: Piromyces equi. Organism_taxid: 99929. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 469008.
Resolution:
1.3Å     R-factor:   0.162     R-free:   0.175
Authors: J.Flint,D.N.Bolam,D.Nurizzo,E.J.Taylor,M.P.Williamson, C.Walters,G.J.Davies,H.J.Gilbert
Key ref:
J.Flint et al. (2005). Probing the mechanism of ligand recognition in family 29 carbohydrate-binding modules. J Biol Chem, 280, 23718-23726. PubMed id: 15784618 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M501551200
Date:
28-Sep-04     Release date:   22-Mar-05    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
Q9C171  (Q9C171_PIREQ) -  Non-catalytic protein 1
Seq:
Struc:
478 a.a.
141 a.a.*
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 1 residue position (black cross)

 

 
DOI no: 10.1074/jbc.M501551200 J Biol Chem 280:23718-23726 (2005)
PubMed id: 15784618  
 
 
Probing the mechanism of ligand recognition in family 29 carbohydrate-binding modules.
J.Flint, D.N.Bolam, D.Nurizzo, E.J.Taylor, M.P.Williamson, C.Walters, G.J.Davies, H.J.Gilbert.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
The recycling of photosynthetically fixed carbon, by the action of microbial plant cell wall hydrolases, is integral to one of the major geochemical cycles and is of considerable industrial importance. Non-catalytic carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) play a key role in this degradative process by targeting hydrolytic enzymes to their cognate substrate within the complex milieu of polysaccharides that comprise the plant cell wall. Family 29 CBMs have, thus far, only been found in an extracellular multienzyme plant cell wall-degrading complex from the anaerobic fungus Piromyces equi, where they exist as a CBM29-1:CBM29-2 tandem. Here we present both the structure of the CBM29-1 partner, at 1.5 A resolution, and examine the importance of hydrophobic stacking interactions as well as direct and solvent-mediated hydrogen bonds in the binding of CBM29-2 to different polysaccharides. CBM29 domains display unusual binding properties, exhibiting specificity for both beta-manno- and beta-gluco-configured ligands such as mannan, cellulose, and glucomannan. Mutagenesis reveals that "stacking" of tryptophan residues in the n and n+2 subsites plays a critical role in ligand binding, whereas the loss of tyrosine-mediated stacking in the n+4 subsite reduces, but does not abrogate, polysaccharide recognition. Direct hydrogen bonds to ligand, such as those provided by Arg-112 and Glu-78, play a pivotal role in the interaction with both mannan and cellulose, whereas removal of water-mediated interactions has comparatively little effect on carbohydrate binding. The interactions of CBM29-2 with the O2 of glucose or mannose contribute little to binding affinity, explaining why this CBM displays dual gluco/manno specificity.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 2.
FIG. 2. Schematic representation of interactions of CBM29-2 with cellohexaose. Solvent-mediated interactions are shown in blue. The numbers at the top of the figure refer to the sugar binding subsites.
Figure 5.
FIG. 5. AGE of wild type and mutants of CBM29-2. Affinities of wild type and mutants of CBM29-2 for the polysaccharides hvKGM, high viscosity CGM, and HEC were assessed by AGE. Nondenaturing gels containing 0%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.0125% of the polysaccharides were run with 20 µg of CBM29-2 proteins with BSA as the control nonbinding protein. All gels show BSA (1), CBM29-2 wild type (2), W24A (3), W26A (4), Y46A (5), E78A (6), R112A (7), Q116A (8), K74A (9), D83A (10), K85A (11), and D114A (12).
 
  The above figures are reprinted by permission from the ASBMB: J Biol Chem (2005, 280, 23718-23726) copyright 2005.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
19908036 D.Guillén, S.Sánchez, and R.Rodríguez-Sanoja (2010).
Carbohydrate-binding domains: multiplicity of biological roles.
  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 85, 1241-1249.  
19338387 C.Montanier, V.A.Money, V.M.Pires, J.E.Flint, B.A.Pinheiro, A.Goyal, J.A.Prates, A.Izumi, H.Stålbrand, C.Morland, A.Cartmell, K.Kolenova, E.Topakas, E.J.Dodson, D.N.Bolam, G.J.Davies, C.M.Fontes, and H.J.Gilbert (2009).
The active site of a carbohydrate esterase displays divergent catalytic and noncatalytic binding functions.
  PLoS Biol, 7, e71.
PDB codes: 2w9x 2waa 2wab 2wao
19278660 Y.He, G.J.Jensen, and P.J.Bjorkman (2009).
Cryo-electron tomography of homophilic adhesion mediated by the neural cell adhesion molecule L1.
  Structure, 17, 460-471.  
18422658 A.Viegas, N.F.Brás, N.M.Cerqueira, P.A.Fernandes, J.A.Prates, C.M.Fontes, M.Bruix, M.J.Romão, A.L.Carvalho, M.J.Ramos, A.L.Macedo, and E.J.Cabrita (2008).
Molecular determinants of ligand specificity in family 11 carbohydrate binding modules: an NMR, X-ray crystallography and computational chemistry approach.
  FEBS J, 275, 2524-2535.  
18844354 Z.R.Laughrey, S.E.Kiehna, A.J.Riemen, and M.L.Waters (2008).
Carbohydrate-pi interactions: what are they worth?
  J Am Chem Soc, 130, 14625-14633.  
17360613 A.L.Carvalho, F.M.Dias, T.Nagy, J.A.Prates, M.R.Proctor, N.Smith, E.A.Bayer, G.J.Davies, L.M.Ferreira, M.J.Romão, C.M.Fontes, and H.J.Gilbert (2007).
Evidence for a dual binding mode of dockerin modules to cohesins.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 3089-3094.
PDB code: 2ccl
16858396 T.Nogi, N.Yasui, M.Hattori, K.Iwasaki, and J.Takagi (2006).
Structure of a signaling-competent reelin fragment revealed by X-ray crystallography and electron tomography.
  EMBO J, 25, 3675-3683.
PDB code: 2ddu
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.