A deadly toxin with a romantic name: Panton-Valentine Leukocidin complex
Bacterial toxins targetting host cell membranesIt may have been Valentine's day in February, but if your beloved passes on the Panton-Valentine Leukocidin complex you might be in trouble! Leukocidins are intriguing proteins, being both soluble and, after undergoing a substantial conformational change, integral membrane proteins.
The leukocidin family consists of staphylococcal toxins, used by pathogens to form pores in host cell membranes to release nutrients which the infecting bacterium can metabolise. Several family members have been isolated from pathogenic bacteria, mostly from staphylococci, but also from Clostridium and Bacillus species. The first to be characterized was the Panton-Valentine Leukocidin complex (PVL, ) which is responsible for the necrotic lesions in the skin of patients infected with Staphylococcus aureus. PVL is found in the majority of the most dangerous antibiotic-resistant S. aureus isolates (MRSA strains - originally from Methicillin-resistant S. aureus, common in hospital-acquired infections).
It takes two...Like other leukocidins, the PVL complex is made up of two components, called F (LukF-PV) and S (LukS-PV) that interact to make pores and induce cell lysis. Genes for both components appear to have been originally acquired by the pathogens from a bacteriophage. The components, secreted by the pathogens in soluble form, assemble to form the pore complexes at the host cell surface.
The structure of the pore in this system is as yet unknown, but the structures of LukF-PV and LukS-PV, in the soluble form, have been solved individually (PDB entries 1pvl and 1t5r, respectively). To form the pore, the soluble S and F components must associate and undergo a conformational change. The mechanism of action seems to be that the S component view-1 binds to specific receptors on the host cell, after which the F component view-2 binds, leading to complex formation. Multiple FS complexes insert into the host-cell membrane to form a pore and start cell lysis.
In spite of their relatively low sequence similarity (30% identical matched residues), the F and S proteins share a common tertiary structure and can be superimposed with a of less than 1.5 Å. To learn about structure superimposition using the PDBe service PDBeFold have a look at the following tutorial: PDBeFold mini-tutorial.
The single structural domain can be divided into three functional subdomains: a central 'β-sandwich' which is the heart of the soluble forms (view-3, shown in blue), a protruding 'rim' (view-3, shown in yellow) and a 'stem' (view-3, shown in red). The stem subdomain is a small motif of two β-strands and it is thought to be key to the pore-forming function of the toxin.
Forming a poreAnalogous to the mechanism suggested for the related toxin α-hemolysin (PDB entry 7ahl, view-4), it is likely that the F and S components cooperate to penetrate the cell membrane by reorganizing their stem subdomains and forming a multimeric assembly that creates a barrel-like pore. In this pore, the α-hemolysin stem has undergone a major conformational change view-4 to form a long β-hairpin. A hairpin is a pair of hydrogen-bonded antiparallel β-strands that are connected by a tight turn. In the case of α-hemolysin, seven of these extended hairpins combine to form a complete ring of strands creating a barrel-like pore view-5. The α-hemolysin structure shows how the rim subdomains of this toxin are positioned as a ring below the β-sandwich subdomains where they are likely to interact with the outer surface of the host cell membrane. It is the pore formed by the stem subdomains that causes the cell to lyse.
The oligomeric state of the integral membrane form of PVL complex is still unknown, but experiments suggest a 1:1 ratio of LukF-PV to LukS-PV. This makes a heptameric pore similar to that of α-hemolysin unlikely but a pore made up of an even number of components could achieve the same goal.
Further explorationIf you want to explore the structures discussed here in more detail then here are some suggestions.
A good starting point is to visit the PDBe Summary pages for each component: PDB entries 1pvl and 1t5r. These pages collect together information and visualizations for each part of the PVL toxin. Key facts for each entry are summarized with PDBprints. This should help you quickly spot that these two entries appear to be from different organisms! The S component has in fact been assigned to the bacteriophage from which it is presumed to be derived.
Another quite interesting feature of 1t5r is that it has an apparently octameric assembly. Does this have any bearing of the structure of the pore? Try comparing the assembly in 1t5r with that in the functional pore assembly 7ahl described above. It seems likely that in fact the 1t5r octamer is an artifact deriving from non-physiological contacts during crystallization. You can use the PDBe Quaternary structure analysis service PDBePISA to check this.
Finally, to find out how to use the PDBeFold service to compare the structures of the two PVL components and superimpose them on α-hemolysin, you can follow the following PDBeQuips tutorial: PDBeFold mini-tutorial.