Please visit the new BioModels platform to access the latest content. This website is no longer updated and will be retired on 31 May 2019.
BioModels Database logo

BioModels Database


Vilar et al. (2006), TGF-β

September 2008, model of the month by Noriko Hiroi
Original model: BIOMD0000000101

Under normal physiological conditions, members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) family help control tissue growth. In particular, TGF-β triggers antiproliferative response in epithelial, endothelial, neuronal and haematopoietic cells. In normal cells, TGF-β induces sustained signals that last more than 6 h. In contrast, certain tumours develop a resistance to the growth-suppressive effects of TGF-β, which is not based on mutations. In this case, TGF-β promotes cancer progression in tumour microenvironments. In cancer cells, TGF-β-induced signals are much shorter than in normal cells, lasting usually about 1-2 h [1, 2]. The computational model [BIOMD0000000101, 3] set out to study the mechanisms underlying these paradoxical characteristics of TGF-β family-induced signals.

The model encompasses the detection and transduction of the extracellular signals to transcription factors (Smad2 etc.), as well as TGF-β receptor trafficking. The authors' main conclusion is that the key quantity which determines the qualitative behaviour of the pathway is the ratio between the ligand-induced degradation of active complexes and their constitutive degradation. When ligand-induced degradation is dominant, the activated (phosphorylated) form of the final target of this signal (Smad2) exhibits a short activation (Figure 2 A, B). On the other hand, when the constitutive degradation process is dominant, activated Smad2 lasts longer (Figure 2 E, F). These two different behaviours can be compared to the phenotypes shown by cancerous and normal epithelial cells.

Model of receptor trafficking and signalling

Figure 1: Model of receptor trafficking and signalling. Figure taken from [3] and modified by N.H. to facilitate comparison with the version in BioModels database (BIOMD0000000101).

By considering the large variation of ligand-receptor combinations within the TGF-β family, the authors proposed an hypothesis to explain how TGF-β could work both as a suppressive signal and also as a stimulus for cell proliferation. TGF-β receptors activate different downstream pathways according to the upstream signal. By competitive inhibition, one ligand can potentially inhibit the effects of another one (Figure 3). Thus, if TGF-β loses its growth suppressor properties, it could promote growth by inhibiting the other growth suppressor pathways.

Other models in BioModels Database cover the biochemistry of TGF-β, such as BIOMD0000000112 [4], BIOMD0000000163 [5], and BIOMD0000000173 [6].

Control of Kinetic Signalling Behaviour

Figure 2: Control of Kinetic Signalling Behaviour. Smad2 activity over time is shown at different constitutive-to-induced degradation ratios (CIR) (low for A, B, medium for C, D, high for E, F) and different shapes of TGF-β input (stepwise increase for A, C, E, slow increase for B, D, F). Figure taken from [3].

Control of Signal Integration

Figure 3: Control of Signal Integration. Formation of ligand-receptor complexes at different CIR and input shapes of TGF-β. Figure taken from [3].

Bibliographic References

  1. P.M. Siegel, J. Massagué. Cytostatic and apoptotic actions of TGF-beta in homeostasis and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 3:807-821, 2003. [SRS@EBI]
  2. F.J. Nicolas, C.S. Hill. Attenuation of the TGF-beta-Smad signaling pathway in pancreatic tumor cells confers resistance to TGF-beta-induced growth arrest. Oncogene 22: 3698-3711, 2003. [SRS@EBI]
  3. J.M. Vilar, R. Jansen, C. Sander. Signal processing in the TGF-beta superfamily ligand-receptor network. PLoS Comput Biol 2:e3, 2006. [SRS@EBI]
  4. D.C. Clarke, M.D. Betterton, X. Liu. Systems theory of Smad signalling. Syst Biol (Stevenage) 153(6):412-424, 2006.[SRS@EBI]
  5. Z. Zi, E. Klipp. Constraint-based modeling and kinetic analysis of the smad dependent TGF-Beta signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 2(9):e936, 2007. [SRS@EBI]
  6. B. Schmierer, A.L. Tournier, P.A. Bates, and C.S. Hill. Mathematical modeling identifies Smad nucleocytoplasmic shuttling as a dynamic signal-interpreting system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105:6608-6613, 2008. [SRS@EBI]