Bacteria Genomes - METHYLOCOCCUS CAPSULATUS
Methylococcus capsulatus is a methane-oxidising bacterium that has
great potential in bioremediation
Methylococcus
capsulatus is a methanotroph (Methane-oxidising bacteria.) Methanotrophs
are ubiquitous Gram-negative bacteria that can use the greenhouse
gas methane as a sole carbon and energy source for growth, thus
playing major roles in global carbon cycles, and in particular,
substantially reducing emissions of biologically generated methane
to the atmosphere.
Methanotrophs
have attracted considerable interest over the past 20 years because
of their potential in producing bulk chemicals (e.g. propylene oxide)
and single-cell protein and for use in biotransformation. Methanotrophs
are unique in that they only grow on methane, although some will
also grow on methanol.
Methanotrophs
are also able to metabolize or co-metabolize xenobiotic compounds,
including chlorinated solvents such as trichloroethylene, and hence
have potential as bioremediation tools.
Methylococcus
capsulatus (Bath) is the first complete genome sequence reported
from an obligate methanotroph. Genome analysis suggests the ability
of M. capsulatus to scavenge copper (including a previously
unreported nonribosomal peptide synthetase) and to use copper in
regulation of methanotrophy, but the exact regulatory mechanisms
remain unclear.
One surprising
outcome of the genome project is evidence suggesting the existence of previously
unsuspected metabolic flexibility in M. capsulatus, including
an ability to grow on sugars, oxidize chemolithotrophic hydrogen
and sulfur, and live under reduced oxygen tension, all of which
have implications for methanotroph ecology. The availability of
the complete genome of M. capsulatus (Bath) deepens our
understanding of methanotroph biology and its relationship to global
carbon cycles.
The genome
of M. capsulatus (Bath) comprises a single circular molecule
of 3,304,697 bp.
References:
PLoS Biol. 2:1616-1628 (2004)
Arch. Microbiol. 177 :167–172 (2002)
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002 Jun;59(1):33-9
 |